Last Week or Two Flowering, Flush??

twentyeight.threefive

Well-Known Member
It means you're another fuckwit who learns irrelevant shite from Google.
You don't understand the difference between the two am I'm the fuckwit? Coming from the guy that jammed a wick in the trunk of his plant and claims it's flushed that's pretty funny. I'm starting to wonder if you put airstones in your medium to inject extra oxygen.

It's basic plant biology not irrelevant shite.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
plants do not absorb nutrients, they absorb cations of those nutrients, positively charged particles...separate atoms of nutrients, you CANNOT flush those cations, and testing the sap in a plant is nothing like a valid experiment...that sap didn't ever contain raw nutrients...it contained cations of those nutrients. also, the plant doesn't excrete excess cations from its roots, they get used up by the plant and turned into vegetable matter of some kind, cellulose, or sugar, or chlorophyll, or t.h.c. ..then the water minus the used cations is sweated out by the stomata on the leaves during transpiration.
you can force too many cations into a plant, and they burn, in different places, depending upon which type of cations they are...but you can't wash them out, the whole purpose behind flushing is to remove an excess of nutrient cations from your medium, so they can't burn your plants tissues...not to remove those excess cations from your plants...because you can't
 

DrOgkush

Well-Known Member
I continually read you can't flush nutrient... That didn't make sense to me, if a plant takes up nutrient it doesn't magically turn to water, all I done was prove that in fact you can flush nutrient out its system by testing the sap.
I never claimed it was scientific but it did prove my theory thats all.
No no no. Dude your pic is just what it is. A pic. I can show you my ppm Ec and all that too. I’ll drill a hole. Tap a string. And claim my readings are 0. When really. They are 0 because the water is at 0. My point is. Where is your proof? Your back up that taping into the stock provides this information? Did you just wake up and and think “hey. Let try this”. I feel like you’d get a better answer by pressing the oil out and testing that. And provide some sort of platform to back up your claim/science.
 

Star Dog

Well-Known Member
No no no. Dude your pic is just what it is. A pic. I can show you my ppm Ec and all that too. I’ll drill a hole. Tap a string. And claim my readings are 0. When really. They are 0 because the water is at 0. My point is. Where is your proof? Your back up that taping into the stock provides this information? Did you just wake up and and think “hey. Let try this”. I feel like you’d get a better answer by pressing the oil out and testing that. And provide some sort of platform to back up your claim/science.
I'm not making a claim or trying to prove anything other than to myself, I take your point all I can say is anyone can try it.
 

twentyeight.threefive

Well-Known Member
No no no. Dude your pic is just what it is. A pic. I can show you my ppm Ec and all that too. I’ll drill a hole. Tap a string. And claim my readings are 0. When really. They are 0 because the water is at 0. My point is. Where is your proof? Your back up that taping into the stock provides this information? Did you just wake up and and think “hey. Let try this”. I feel like you’d get a better answer by pressing the oil out and testing that. And provide some sort of platform to back up your claim/science.

I continually read you can't flush nutrient... That didn't make sense to me
It doesn't make sense to him so he comes up with an "experiment" that makes sense to him to prove his previous belief. Not even a good experiment at that. Confirmation bias.
 

Star Dog

Well-Known Member
No no no. Dude your pic is just what it is. A pic. I can show you my ppm Ec and all that too. I’ll drill a hole. Tap a string. And claim my readings are 0. When really. They are 0 because the water is at 0. My point is. Where is your proof? Your back up that taping into the stock provides this information? Did you just wake up and and think “hey. Let try this”. I feel like you’d get a better answer by pressing the oil out and testing that. And provide some sort of platform to back up your claim/science.
Regardless who twist the words I never claimed anything, I shared my findings which I stand by 100%
 

DrOgkush

Well-Known Member
I can send you a pic of myself But what does that prove if I’m diabetic or not. Because I’m holding blood sugar number up
 

Boatguy

Well-Known Member
plants do not absorb nutrients, they absorb cations of those nutrients, positively charged particles...separate atoms of nutrients, you CANNOT flush those cations, and testing the sap in a plant is nothing like a valid experiment...that sap didn't ever contain raw nutrients...it contained cations of those nutrients. also, the plant doesn't excrete excess cations from its roots, they get used up by the plant and turned into vegetable matter of some kind, cellulose, or sugar, or chlorophyll, or t.h.c. ..then the water minus the used cations is sweated out by the stomata on the leaves during transpiration.
you can force too many cations into a plant, and they burn, in different places, depending upon which type of cations they are...but you can't wash them out, the whole purpose behind flushing is to remove an excess of nutrient cations from your medium, so they can't burn your plants tissues...not to remove those excess cations from your plants...because you can't
Weird how people think the plant is like a straw sucking up whatever they are in... My organic pot has never tasted of manure or hydrolyzed fish, and my bottle fed arent any different
 
Top