Macro photos thread--any macro pics

ph03nix

Well-Known Member
Hey all, long time no see. I hate it when we have to take an internet hiatus.

Well anyway, I recently acquired a new camera and naturally I've been playing with it. These aren't great, but I've got a few macros for you.

We found this stink-bug laying her eggs on the kids' curtain... you can see the size of the weave. They look like little pearls, don't they?

stinkbug and eggs.jpg stinkbug eggs.jpg

And just because I know how the boys' minds work... a little accidental porn.

accidental porn.jpg
 

bonz

Well-Known Member
nice. this one has been quiet for a while. i should have some new ones soon. just started to flower a couple weeks almost now.
 

Seamaiden

Well-Known Member
Um.. bonz? I hate to tell you this, but it looks like someone sprinkled glitter all over one of your buds. Got little girls around? ;)

Ph03n and Gryph, sorry I missed you on this! What kind of toy didja get, ph03nix? I recently whipped out my very first digital camera purchased back in '04, an Oly C-740. I've been using the Canon EOS for so long though that I'm having a hard time remembering how to adjust her settings, and one of the big reasons I picked up the C-740 was because of its 10x optical zoom and macro settings (and, for a short time a u/w rig was made for it). Wish to HELL the Oly C-8080 hadn't been flooded during a dive (or that I'd thought to insure it before we went on the trip), I could f'ing strangle whoever it was that dropped the rig in the dive boat. :evil:
 

bonz

Well-Known Member
thx there maiden.....i had a dust fairy come to visit.

mt roomy has a kodak easy share dx6490. i cant get this thing to work worth a shit compared to my small cheepo nikkon.
the kodak has 10x zoom, and 4 mega pixel. my little guy only has 3x zoom and 5.9 megapixel and is a way better camers. love the nikor lenses
 

bonz

Well-Known Member
fdd are those shots done by thumbnail...i like the way they look clicking on them with the black screen in the background. realy shows the pic better.
 

Gryphonn

Well-Known Member
Macro photography - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


"In recent years, the term macro has been used in marketing material to mean being able to focus on a subject close enough so that when a regular 6×4 inch (15×10 cm) print is made, the image is life-size or larger. This requires a magnification ratio of only approximately 1:4, more easily attainable by lens makers."



View attachment 244610 View attachment 244611
I think the original definition was that the lens could reproduce the subject lifesize on a 35mm frame. Of course, once processed and enlarged to go on a 6 x 4 print, it would be larger than life size.
 

Gryphonn

Well-Known Member
Um.. bonz? I hate to tell you this, but it looks like someone sprinkled glitter all over one of your buds. Got little girls around? ;)

Ph03n and Gryph, sorry I missed you on this! What kind of toy didja get, ph03nix? I recently whipped out my very first digital camera purchased back in '04, an Oly C-740. I've been using the Canon EOS for so long though that I'm having a hard time remembering how to adjust her settings, and one of the big reasons I picked up the C-740 was because of its 10x optical zoom and macro settings (and, for a short time a u/w rig was made for it). Wish to HELL the Oly C-8080 hadn't been flooded during a dive (or that I'd thought to insure it before we went on the trip), I could f'ing strangle whoever it was that dropped the rig in the dive boat. :evil:
Hey stranger! Good to see your ascii. We're back online again after buying some tools/toys. Ph03nix has a new Fuji S8100fd camera. It has an effective zoom of 18-414mm I think. It also can focus to 1cm in macro mode. Shoots video as well, plus it can shoot up to 33 still frames per second at 3 megapixels. It's a 10 migapixel camera. Very nice and we got it cheap.
I picked up a Sony a200 with an 18-70mm lens for AUD620. About 200 less than retail. I am going to stick with Sony so that my Konica Minolta 5D doesn't become redundant. We're a three camera family now! Next big buy when I can afford it will be an a900 or whatever Sony brings out that is better, plus a good fast zoom and a dedicated macro lens. That'll be a while though. We're still getting back on our feet at the moment.

We also picked up an Acer 5520 laptop so we would always be able to get online. It's all part of our plans for the very near future. I elaborated in the 9 to 5 thread I think.
 

Gryphonn

Well-Known Member
(snip)...and one of the big reasons I picked up the C-740 was because of its 10x optical zoom and macro settings (and, for a short time a u/w rig was made for it). Wish to HELL the Oly C-8080 hadn't been flooded during a dive (or that I'd thought to insure it before we went on the trip), I could f'ing strangle whoever it was that dropped the rig in the dive boat. :evil:
I'd die. Seriously. Back when I did my first big adventure up north, I had a Minolta Weathermatic 110 film camera. It took wonderful photos through its fixed 28mm lens and was waterproof to 3 metres. I used it mainly out in the west where the bulldust would get into any normal camera, and on occasion in the surf. Anyway, some $%#er stole it from my back pack in the luggage compartment of the train. I was soooo pissed off because I couldn't afford to buy another camera.
 

Seamaiden

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I was at depth when I noticed water coming down through the flash housing. You can't just swim back to the surface really quick when you're down 60'-80'.

Those Acers are a pretty decent deal. The Man is a computer geek big time and he's always telling people to get those instead of the usual Gateway or Dell.

So, if you're gonna be up north, how close the sea will you be? Gonna do any diving or snorkeling yourself? I'd be in that water every God damned day (just like I was in Guam), pretty much all day. That's when people start mistaking me for black. :lol:
 

Gryphonn

Well-Known Member
Yeah, I was at depth when I noticed water coming down through the flash housing. You can't just swim back to the surface really quick when you're down 60'-80'.

Those Acers are a pretty decent deal. The Man is a computer geek big time and he's always telling people to get those instead of the usual Gateway or Dell.

So, if you're gonna be up north, how close the sea will you be? Gonna do any diving or snorkeling yourself? I'd be in that water every God damned day (just like I was in Guam), pretty much all day. That's when people start mistaking me for black. :lol:
Yep, this Acer is exactly what we need. Enough graphics grunt for video and image editing and plenty of storage. Built in WiFi etc. We've got a USB mobile broadband modem as well. Next purchase will be some stupidly expensive portable satellite receiver so we can get online in the middle of no-where. Gotta check prices though. If it's too much, we'll just edit offline and then hike in once a month to upload stuff. We'd prefer to be able to upload realtime though. Everytime I think about the idea of uploading daily video of us building our own hut out of local materials and growing/hunting our own food to a blog, it just seems bizarre :mrgreen::peace:bongsmilie

Well, if we end up where we want to be, it'll be a short walk (100 metres) through rainforest onto the beach. The reef varies in distance from shore up there, but there is live reef (last time i was there) less than 300 metres from the beach. 90% of the time, the water is calm and clean. I'll be making a raft or boat to get out there because it will be part of our food supply (refer to the Old hippies Posts) .

I've got to check the scene out up there again, because things have changed a lot. It's still wilderness, but some of it is patrolled regularly by our version of Park Rangers. At the very least, it'll be around a three hour walk through mountainous rainforest to where we'll roughly be. Walking or by boat will be the only way to get to us. The furthest I expect we'll be from the coast is an hour walk, no further, preferably much closer.
 

ph03nix

Well-Known Member
Well, 4 days later, and a bit of an update on the stinkbug eggs. Check them out. You can see them all curled up inside their eggs. You can see their eyes, and if you look closely you can pick out their legs. Now, these things are tiny... smaller than a pin head. All you can see with the naked eye are tiny little eggs with weeny little dots on them. I love this camera.
stinkbug eggs day 4.jpg


bonz...
Mmmm yummy. That looks very tasty... I love the little hairs... and that glittery stuff just looks very appetising. :weed:

fdd....
Lurve the tricombs... you could just slurp that all up, couldn't you? And I'm just a sucker for bug shots... I especially like the wasp and the black widow (we call them red-backs over here). Oh, and I reckon you could make a bit of money on the side by selling the shot of the snails as art work in a french restaurant...
So on top of being a legendary grower, you can take a good photo too, eh? I'm starting to feel inferior...

seamaiden...
Yes, got a new camera... a little fuji, as Gryph said. I was thinking about the sony that Gryph ended up with, but in the end I went with the fuji because of all the extra features that it has. My old camera was a fuji so I was familiar with the setup, and I was impressed with the quality. Now, I know it's not a dslr but I think that a good digital can be greatly underrated. It's quite good enough for print quality... it's got heaps more features... it's smaller and lighter... easier to use... and it's a lot cheaper (probably less than a quarter of a comparable dslr)... what's not to love?
It's a 10 megapixel camera so has fairly good quality. The sensor is smaller, so naturally the result is not quite as good as the sony, but still good enough. It has 2 macro settings and they are really good. In my opinion it takes better macro shots than the sony... I'll re-assess my opinion when he can afford a good macro lens. I can get as close as 1 cm (about a third of an inch), which is ptetty good. I love macro photography, so that feature was really high on my list. It has an 18x optical zoom (plus a digital zoom but I don't bother counting that), which equates to a greater zoom range than Gryph's two lenses... and it's in one unit... no changing lenses all the time. It also does video... another bonus... and can take up to 13.5 frames a second in multi-shot mode (not 33 as Gryph said... up to 33 consecutive shots). I didn't think I'd like this feature as much at first, but when you use it on a couple of cute little girls on a waterslide, you realise just how much you missed before. It's amazing how fast facial expressions can change. I love it. The only complaint that I have is that the manual focus mode requires you to jump through hoops, and then be a contortionist to use it. I would like to see a button that is easier to reach (or preferably a dslr-type lens system) because I do like to focus manually a lot of the time. On the whole though, I'm happy.
Oh, and we'll be closer to the beach than an hour's walk, you can be sure of that. I'm not walking an hour each way every time I want a swim... :-?
 

caddyluck

Well-Known Member
Well, 4 days later, and a bit of an update on the stinkbug eggs. Check them out. You can see them all curled up inside their eggs. You can see their eyes, and if you look closely you can pick out their legs. Now, these things are tiny... smaller than a pin head. All you can see with the naked eye are tiny little eggs with weeny little dots on them. I love this camera.
View attachment 246697

hell yeah, this is going to be interesting. cute little boogers :joint:
 

ph03nix

Well-Known Member
ha get a journal of your growing eggs ....lol
Ha. I might just do that. I must admit that I'm curious. I'd be good to catch them hatching. Besides, I can't grow anything else at the moment...

But I'm not too sure how long I'll actually leave them go. There are a couple of little girls who are worried that they're going to wake up in the middle of the night and find a heap of little baby stink bugs up their nose, or something.

Bloody kids... :lol:
 
Top