Main Stream media pulling out all stops to make sure Ron Paul Doesn't win

UncleBuck · Dec 21, 2011

deprave said:
hes a clone of Ron Paul with pecks

unlike ron paul, you cannot question how he would govern with respect to my wife's reproductive health, cannabis re-legalization, or gay rights. these are 3 social issues i hold dear, and johnson has a proven record. ron paul has a record that makes me want to vote for santorum even more.

gary johnson is NOT a ron paul clone. to say as much is gary johnson blasphemy.

deprave · Dec 21, 2011

Carne Seca said:
Oh great response. Right up there with, "Oh yeah!"

Ayn Rand wouldn't like Gary Johnson, she didn't like libertarians, and she didn't like the idea that she was so influential to libertarians. Ron Paul has said that she did make an influence on him.

UncleBuck · Dec 21, 2011

deprave said:
Nope, I don't agree that anything from 1979 is even relevant, especially something thats against government and not actual people. You are being way over dramatic.

it is against the government when it comes to certain GROUPS of people. what do you not get about this?

i do not have this concern with gary johnson. i may have to support him now. for spite.

sadly, "johnsonbot" does nto have the same ring as "paulbot". in fact, it sounds kind of dirty.

i feel certain that carne agrees with me on this

deprave · Dec 21, 2011

UncleBuck said:
unlike ron paul, you cannot question how he would govern with respect to my wife's reproductive health, cannabis re-legalization, or gay rights. these are 3 social issues i hold dear, and johnson has a proven record. ron paul has a record that makes me want to vote for santorum even more.

gary johnson is NOT a ron paul clone. to say as much is gary johnson blasphemy.

Why do you have so many questions? You can just look it up its consistent, and you definitly shouldn't have questions regarding these things which for some odd reason you hold "dear", apparently over your own freedom.

deprave · Dec 21, 2011

UncleBuck said:
it is against the government when it comes to certain GROUPS of people. what do you not get about this?

No its against the government and not people? What do you not get about that? The government paying for stuff is not civil rights, the government is not a person. It also would of ended federal government involvement in marriage, Ron Paul is pro-gaymarriage and pro abortion if your wife actually needs it, he just wants the federal government out of our personal affairs. So no federal gay bars, good you can make your own gay bar and it will be way better then a crappy federal gay bar, a state gay bar would even be better. This is ridiculous to even be discussing something from 1979 really.

UncleBuck · Dec 21, 2011

deprave said:
No its against the government and not people? What do you not get about that? The government paying for stuff is not civil rights, the government is not a person. It also would of ended federal government involvement in marriage, Ron Paul is pro-gaymarriage and pro abortion if your wife actually needs it, he just wants the federal government out of our personal affairs. So no federal gay bars, good you can make your own gay bar and it will be way better then a crappy federal gay bar, a state gay bar would even be better.

this picture is still up in my other tab, so i will post it again. you complete fabrications do merit such a response.

deflection does not a counterpoint make. it also seems like you are trolling a la beardo style.

Carne Seca · Dec 21, 2011

deprave said:
No its against the government and not people? What do you not get about that? The government paying for stuff is not civil rights, the government is not a person. It also would of ended federal government involvement in marriage, Ron Paul is pro-gaymarriage and pro abortion if your wife actually needs it, he just wants the federal government out of our personal affairs. So no federal gay bars, good you can make your own gay bar and it will be way better then a crappy federal gay bar, a state gay bar would even be better. This is ridiculous to even be discussing something from 1979 really.

rrrrriiight.... it's amazing how you spin this. He would allow states to discriminate against women, minorities, gays, muslims, and any other group of people a particular state doesn't like.

deprave · Dec 21, 2011

Your a sensationalist and I am done entertaining you, goodnight.

Canna Sylvan · Dec 21, 2011

This thread is almost better than getting high.

Carne Seca · Dec 21, 2011

deprave said:
Your a sensationalist and I am done entertaining you, goodnight.

No you lost a debate and it's chapping your ass.

deprave · Dec 21, 2011

Carne Seca said:
rrrrriiight.... it's amazing how you spin this. He would allow states to discriminate against women, minorities, gays, muslims, and any other group of people a particular state doesn't like.

Its amazing how I spin this? and then you follow that with some radical sensationalist bullshit conspiracy plot, are states more racist and discriminatory then feds? Will Ron Paul single handidly start discriminations nation wide because of something he wrote in 1979? lol...fuck you guys are drama queens...

UncleBuck · Dec 21, 2011

deprave said:
Its amazing how I spin this? and then you follow that with some radical sensationalist bullshit conspiracy plot, are states more racist and discriminatory then feds? Will Ron Paul single handidly start discriminations nation wide? lol...fuck you guys are drama queens...

i could make hay out of this statement as well, but i think you were right earlier when you said goodnight.

tons of fun debating, we'll do it again soon. i'm sure.

Carne Seca · Dec 21, 2011

deprave said:
Its amazing how I spin this? and then you follow that with some radical sensationalist bullshit conspiracy plot, are states more racist and discriminatory then feds?

A. Ron and his clone..err....son have both stated that businesses should have the right to discriminate and would not have voted to abolish the Jim Crow Laws
B. Quite a few states still have discriminatory laws against LGBT's
C. Anti-abortion laws are cropping up all over the nation which nearly makes it impossible to get an abortion. Some even went so far as to allow the jailing of doctors who perform abortions
D. A law was introduced in Mississippi that would have banned contraception and in vitro fertilization
E. Laws are being passed across the nation to make voter registration almost impossible for the poor, minorities and the elderly
F. You know all this yet you choose to ignore it because your God is Ron the Paul. May his holy vaginal speculum bless you and keep you from harm.

Canna Sylvan · Dec 21, 2011

Carne Seca said:
A. Ron and his clone..err....son have both stated that businesses should have the right to discriminate and would not have voted to abolish the Jim Crow Laws
B. Quite a few states still have discriminatory laws against LGBT's
C. Anti-abortion laws are cropping up all over the nation which nearly makes it impossible to get an abortion. Some even went so far as to allow the jailing of doctors who perform abortions
D. A law was introduced in Mississippi that would have banned contraception and in vitro fertilization
E. Laws are being passed across the nation to make voter registration almost impossible for the poor, minorities and the elderly
F. You know all this yet you choose to ignore it because your God is Ron the Paul. May his holy vaginal speculum bless you and keep you from harm.

Is that multiple choice for, "what I agree with and wish was true"? In that case, I choose C.

Carne Seca · Dec 21, 2011

Canna Sylvan said:
Is that multiple choice for, "what I agree with and wish was true"? In that case, I choose C.

Remember that when a female member of your family has a tubal pregnancy or is pregnant due to rape or (not saying anything about your family) incest. What if one of them were in an accident and it was a choice between the mother's life and the child's (yes, this really happens)?

By all means, choose C.

Canna Sylvan · Dec 21, 2011

Carne Seca said:
Remember that when a female member of your family has a tubal pregnancy or is pregnant due to rape or (not saying anything about your family) incest. What if one of them were in an accident and it was a choice between the mother's life and the child's (yes, this really happens)?

By all means, choose C.

I still choose C. All we have is children. We all die. The only way we live on is children. Anyone who would choose themself over their child is sickening. I couldn't imagine a life without all my children. I'd sacrifice myself instantly.

Http://www.lifenews.com/2008/06/02/int-770/

Carne Seca · Dec 21, 2011

Canna Sylvan said:
I still choose C. All we have is children. We all die. The only way we live on is children. Anyone who would choose themself over their child is sickening. I couldn't imagine a life without all my children. I'd sacrifice myself instantly.

Http://www.lifenews.com/2008/06/02/int-770/

I would sacrifice you as well... instantly.

Canna Sylvan · Dec 21, 2011

Carne Seca said:
I would sacrifice you as well... instantly.

You sound more like an antinatalist than Mormon.

Carne Seca · Dec 21, 2011

Canna Sylvan said:
You sound more like an antinatalist than Mormon.

I didn't realize Mormons sounded a certain way. How does that work exactly? Do you poke us in the stomach so that we giggle like the Pillsbury Dough Boy? Please, enlighten a BYU alumnus and generational Mormon that has general authorities and temple presidents in his lineage. I'm all ears.

Canna Sylvan · Dec 21, 2011

Carne Seca said:
I didn't realize Mormons sounded a certain way. How does that work exactly? Do you poke us in the stomach so that we giggle like the Pillsbury Dough Boy? Please, enlighten a BYU alumnus and generational Mormon that has general authorities and temple presidents in his lineage. I'm all ears.

I think your previous comment broke #6.

Http://lds.org/scriptures/dc-testament/dc/59.6?lang=eng#5

Main Stream media pulling out all stops to make sure Ron Paul Doesn't win

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads