Malicious Obstruction in Senate. Repubs and Teagaggers Unite

see4

Well-Known Member
There is no historical precedent for the number of cabinet-level nominees that Republicans have blocked or delayed in the Obama administration. Chuck Hagel became the first defense secretary nominee ever filibustered. John Brennan, the C.I.A. director, was the subject of an epic filibuster by Senator Rand Paul. Kathleen Sebelius and John Bryson, the secretaries of health and human services and commerce, were subjected to 60-vote confirmation margins instead of simple majorities. Susan Rice surely would have been filibustered and thus was not nominated to be secretary of state.
Jacob Lew, the Treasury secretary, was barraged with 444 written questions, mostly from Republicans, more than the previous seven nominees for that position combined. Many were ridiculous and had nothing to do with Mr. Lew’s fitness for office, such as a demand to explain the Treasury’s social media policies, or questioning an infographic on the department’s blog eight months ago.
Gina McCarthy, the nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, is being blocked by Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri until he gets the answers he wants on a local levee project. And Thomas Perez, nominated to be labor secretary, is being held up by Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, who is angry about the Justice Department’s enforcement of voting rights laws. By comparison, there were four filibusters of cabinet-level positions during George W. Bush’s two terms, and one under President Ronald Reagan.
There have also been several impediments to executive-branch nominees beneath the cabinet level, the most troubling being that of Richard Cordray, whom Mr. Obama has renominated to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Because the bureau cannot properly run without a full-time director, Republicans intend to nullify many of its powers by blocking Mr. Cordray for the second time.
 
Damnit. This thread fails. I meant to say Teagaggers. But I didn't mean Unit. I meant Unite.

Thread fail. Oh well. Better luck next time.
 
That's ok
If Obama resurrected Reagan
The house would block his nomination to any post just becuase Obama picked him
 
lol, teagaggers.

that is what you would call a teabagger who lets his latent impulses get the better of him, right before heading off to protest marriage equality or workplace protections for LGBTQ folks.
 
a google image search for "teagagger"

stupidmeetirrational.jpg
 
There is no historical precedent for the number of cabinet-level nominees that Republicans have blocked or delayed in the Obama administration. Chuck Hagel became the first defense secretary nominee ever filibustered. John Brennan, the C.I.A. director, was the subject of an epic filibuster by Senator Rand Paul. Kathleen Sebelius and John Bryson, the secretaries of health and human services and commerce, were subjected to 60-vote confirmation margins instead of simple majorities. Susan Rice surely would have been filibustered and thus was not nominated to be secretary of state.
Jacob Lew, the Treasury secretary, was barraged with 444 written questions, mostly from Republicans, more than the previous seven nominees for that position combined. Many were ridiculous and had nothing to do with Mr. Lew’s fitness for office, such as a demand to explain the Treasury’s social media policies, or questioning an infographic on the department’s blog eight months ago.
Gina McCarthy, the nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, is being blocked by Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri until he gets the answers he wants on a local levee project. And Thomas Perez, nominated to be labor secretary, is being held up by Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, who is angry about the Justice Department’s enforcement of voting rights laws. By comparison, there were four filibusters of cabinet-level positions during George W. Bush’s two terms, and one under President Ronald Reagan.
There have also been several impediments to executive-branch nominees beneath the cabinet level, the most troubling being that of Richard Cordray, whom Mr. Obama has renominated to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Because the bureau cannot properly run without a full-time director, Republicans intend to nullify many of its powers by blocking Mr. Cordray for the second time.


Relax, you guys will get to be mean to cabinet level nominees after the 2016 elections.
 
eRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTRRTRTR.... Drop to sub-light..impulse 10%.....station keeping.

It is a Senate rule, from the beginning for Us. Cry foul is part of the game.
 
There is no historical precedent for the number of cabinet-level nominees that Republicans have blocked or delayed in the Obama administration. Chuck Hagel became the first defense secretary nominee ever filibustered. John Brennan, the C.I.A. director, was the subject of an epic filibuster by Senator Rand Paul. Kathleen Sebelius and John Bryson, the secretaries of health and human services and commerce, were subjected to 60-vote confirmation margins instead of simple majorities. Susan Rice surely would have been filibustered and thus was not nominated to be secretary of state.
Jacob Lew, the Treasury secretary, was barraged with 444 written questions, mostly from Republicans, more than the previous seven nominees for that position combined. Many were ridiculous and had nothing to do with Mr. Lew’s fitness for office, such as a demand to explain the Treasury’s social media policies, or questioning an infographic on the department’s blog eight months ago.
Gina McCarthy, the nominee to lead the Environmental Protection Agency, is being blocked by Senator Roy Blunt of Missouri until he gets the answers he wants on a local levee project. And Thomas Perez, nominated to be labor secretary, is being held up by Senator David Vitter of Louisiana, who is angry about the Justice Department’s enforcement of voting rights laws. By comparison, there were four filibusters of cabinet-level positions during George W. Bush’s two terms, and one under President Ronald Reagan.
There have also been several impediments to executive-branch nominees beneath the cabinet level, the most troubling being that of Richard Cordray, whom Mr. Obama has renominated to lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Because the bureau cannot properly run without a full-time director, Republicans intend to nullify many of its powers by blocking Mr. Cordray for the second time.

everyone on your list is a fucking idiot with the exception of Hagel - thank the Israel lobby for that one moron...
 
eRRRRRRRRRRRRRRTTTRRTRTR.... Drop to sub-light..impulse 10%.....station keeping.

It is a Senate rule, from the beginning for Us. Cry foul is part of the game.

Sorry brah. As much as you want, you can't explain it away. Republican party is the obstructionist party. Plain and simple.

Wooops!
 
everyone on your list is a fucking idiot with the exception of Hagel - thank the Israel lobby for that one moron...

Figured a Republican would try to use that as an argument. Sorry obstructionist, you don't get to argue this one away.
 
I am trying to influence the ones that are not bat shit. I would like to see striving for truth and not the drivel from Zombies.

It is in the Rules. From the beginning. There is no explanation beyond that.

IT is stupid, not you are, (oh not that mommie!) it is stupid. But crying fouls is also part of the game, PART.
 
I am trying to influence the ones that are not bat shit. I would like to see striving for truth and not the drivel from Zombies.

It is in the Rules. From the beginning. There is no explanation beyond that.

IT is stupid, not you are, (oh not that mommie!) it is stupid. But crying fouls is also part of the game, PART.

Obamacare is the rule. Stop crying foul.
 
Figured a Republican would try to use that as an argument. Sorry obstructionist, you don't get to argue this one away.

You're stupid enough to think I buy into your partisan bullshit... Both parties are as bad as each other and have been nothing but shit for the American people. In this case yes republicans blocked it initially which was a stupid move considering hagels military history, but a deeper look at why will reveal the it's because of the BLUF comments hagel has made regarding Israel that pissed of its lobby...

http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/02/27/has_obama_defeated_the_israel_lobby

Conversely, please keep thinking all those lobbyists with billions behind them in money and influence, have no voice on capitol hill :dunce:
 
Back
Top