Should Goldman Sach's be Impeached and Fired?

ginjawarrior · Jan 30, 2012

sync0s said:
Market regulates them.

what share of the market does goldman sachs currently command?

ginjawarrior · Jan 30, 2012

deprave said:
Your propsing then that we just let them continue the corruption and trying to further it by making me explain the 'hows' and 'what ifs', no thanks, I am not here to argue unproductively. You provide hypothetical scenarios as if they are reality and then suggest that I dig myself a hole by joining in on that, again no thanks....What I have to ask to continue this discussion productively is firstly; What is your suggestion? Secondly; Again, Do you really expect goldman sachs to regulate themselves?

your the one saying ron paul will fix it im just questioning that line of thinking.. how will ron paul removing regulations not lead to goldman sachs regulating themselves???

deprave · Jan 30, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
your the one saying ron paul will fix it im just questioning that line of thinking.. how will ron paul removing regulations not lead to goldman sachs regulating themselves???

I am not really saying that 'Ron Paul will fix it'. I am saying that Ron Paul wouldn't appoint crony captilist. Finally to say that Ron Paul will remove regulations is just not practical or even true. If goldman sach's is not running the whitehouse, treasurey, etc...Then they will be limited in their power, pretty simple.

ginjawarrior · Jan 30, 2012

deprave said:
I am not really saying that 'Ron Paul will fix it'. I am saying that Ron Paul wouldn't appoint crony captilist. Finally to say that Ron Paul will remove regulations is just not practical or even true. If goldman sach's is not running the whitehouse, treasurey, etc...Then they will be limited in their power, pretty simple.

i thought removal of regulations was one of the main platforms of the paul i sure have seen him mention it a few times

why would goldman sachs even need to be in the whitehouse if there are no regulations?

deprave · Jan 30, 2012

It is his beliefs and philosophy but he recognizes that its not practical to do something radical as you are suggesting it. Ron Paul is strongly against crony capitalism such as this.

ginjawarrior · Jan 30, 2012

deprave said:
It is his beliefs and philosophy but he recognizes that its not practical to do something radical as you are suggesting it. Ron Paul is strongly against crony capitalism such as this.

so he advocates it, campaigns on the issue, writes about it on his website, yet if elected he's not going to do any of it??

and you say he's different from other politicians?

futureprospects · Jan 30, 2012

Ron Paul must be voted for! We need to finally have marijuana legalized Obama is a joke we need a clearout!!!
Legalize Marijuana!!!

sync0s · Jan 31, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
what share of the market does goldman sachs currently command?

Likely most of it, your point?

lifegoesonbrah · Jan 31, 2012

futureprospects said:
Ron Paul must be voted for! We need to finally have marijuana legalized Obama is a joke we need a clearout!!!
Legalize Marijuana!!!

I never thought there would be such distaste at a MMJ forum for a presidential candidate who advocates the legalization of Marijuana at the federal level.

sync0s · Jan 31, 2012

lifegoesonbrah said:
I never thought there would be such distaste at a MMJ forum for a presidential candidate who advocates the legalization of Marijuana at the federal level.

I'll say it before UB or Dan say it: because we're not one issue voters.

lifegoesonbrah · Jan 31, 2012

sync0s said:
I'll say it before UB or Dan say it: because we're not one issue voters.

Understandable, but they fucken despise him.

sync0s · Jan 31, 2012

lifegoesonbrah said:
Understandable, but they fucken despise him.

Because people on here have a fetish with posting the fucking hell out of the same ron paul videos and spewing the same rhetoric. It is true, you sometimes can't have a legitimate debate with some Ron Paul supporters. Ron Paul is more hated because of the people who support him than Ron Paul himself.

ginjawarrior · Jan 31, 2012

ginjawarrior said:
oh and once ron paul removes regulations does goldman sachs even need to be in whitehouse anymore would they not be regulating themselves?

sync0s said:
Market regulates them.

ginjawarrior said:
what share of the market does goldman sachs currently command?

sync0s said:
Likely most of it, your point?

so the market that goldman sach has a majority share in will be the market that regulates goldman sachs???

im trying to follow that but doesnt quite fit

ginjawarrior · Jan 31, 2012

had to add this one

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turtles_all_the_way_down

deprave · Jan 31, 2012

sync0s said:
I'll say it before UB or Dan say it: because we're not one issue voters.

that's exactly it...they are one-issue voters..UB's only reason he doesn't support RP is because he is pro-choice, for Dan its his economic conspiracy theory.

olylifter420 · Jan 31, 2012

goldman sach o'shit should be dismantled... that way i dont have to repay school loans...

NoDrama · Jan 31, 2012

Goldman Sachs rules the world. [video=youtube;lqN3amj6AcE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqN3amj6AcE[/video]

lets not forget our own government either.....http://my.firedoglake.com/fflambeau...names-attached-to-the-giant-squids-tentacles/

UncleBuck · Jan 31, 2012

deprave said:
that's exactly it...they are one-issue voters..UB's only reason he doesn't support RP is because he is pro-choice, for Dan its his economic conspiracy theory.

lol, no.

besides the whole wanting the state to make decisions for my wife that she should be making, there is also the insane fiscal policies (gold standard? LOL!), his dislike of civil rights, his already disproven theory of private charities paying for your healthcare (didn't work out well for kent snyder), and a bevy of other kookiness.

i am not in the business of voting for luddites.

NoDrama · Jan 31, 2012

UncleBuck said:
lol, no.

besides the whole wanting the state to make decisions for my wife that she should be making, there is also the insane fiscal policies (gold standard? LOL!), his dislike of civil rights, his already disproven theory of private charities paying for your healthcare (didn't work out well for kent snyder), and a bevy of other kookiness.

i am not in the business of voting for luddites.

These are the same old talking points you had last year, I expect a more recent appraisal of RP from you.

UncleBuck · Jan 31, 2012

NoDrama said:
These are the same old talking points you had last year, I expect a more recent appraisal of RP from you.

more recently? ok. he still surrounds himself with shitty handlers, as evidenced by the bungling (once again) of the newsletter fiasco and inability to buy a suit that fits.

how fucking hard is it to buy a suit that fits?

Should Goldman Sach's be Impeached and Fired?

Should goldman sach's be impeached and fired?

No, I am voting for obama again.

No, I am voting for Mitt Romney.

No, I am voting for Newt.

Yes, I am voting for Ron Paul.

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads