Marijuana Creates Jobs

And it really makes no sense that Solar Panels are used to power houses directly.

Alternators are what make our electricity, like the electricity in your house and the electricity that powers streetlights and everything is generated by Alternators. They are giant machines that use small amounts of mechanical energy, a small amount of electricity and giant magnets in order to move basically like a turbine inside that generates massive amounts of electricity.

These are powered by Coal, or natural gases like Propane and things like that. But if you pointed the energy made from Solar Panels at the Alternators that currently power our electric grid, it would generate massive amounts of electricity and eliminate most of Americas need for fossil fuels, the rest is just cars pretty much.
You are mentally spread too thin to actually understand any of the topics you explore.
 
In this supreme court case, Timothy Leary was arrested at the Mexican American border. At this time the drug laws for Marijuana were created by the Marijuana Tax Act. He had forgotten that he had Marijuana that he had bought in New York, still in his car and for some unrelated reason he was denied access to Mexico that day, and was searched when he returned to America. He was arrested for, under the Marijuana Tax Act, not declaring his Marijuana, not stating the Marijuana business he was on, not having a tax stamp etc. He argued that if he had declared the Marijuana he would have been arrested and if he had declared the Marijuana in a Government office to get a tax stamp, he would have been arrested. The Supreme court declared that this violated his fifth amendment right to not incriminate yourself, and the entire Marijuana tax act was overturned, making Marijuana legal until the Controlled Substances Act was written.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leary_v._United_States

Timothy Leary was a renowned psychologist, and when he was booked in to jail he was actually given a psychological test that he created.
 
I'm eating a snickers bar that tastes like coffee. It's good but scary at the same time.. I know it shouldn't taste like this, but I'm not mad at it.
47675368.jpg
 
Think about this:

In the early 1900s, it was legal to buy, sell, trade, posses and give away Marijuana. Then, laws were made to put taxes on Marijuana, and eventually those laws were used to arrest people by not issuing them tax stamps to avoid arrest, then in the late 1960s the Marijuana tax act was overturned and the 1970s started with the Controlled Substances Act.

So if you have been a farmer in Mexico during the past 100 years, it has gone from being completely legal to cross this imaginary line to sell your produce for Dollars instead of Pesos, to being a crime and challenge to get things across the imaginary line.
 
Oppression of Hindus by the United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/271997415/Hindu-Brief#scribd
http://www.scribd.com/doc/270436023/Somic-Shilpa-Shastras
The drug laws (the Controlled Substances Act) are in violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution, similar to how it violates this same Clause in Native American and Santo Diame cases. It is also possible the act violate the 21st Amendment, which legalized not alcohol or fermented drinks, but all intoxicating liquors, and by the definition of intoxicating liquor, Bhang is an intoxicating liquor (The Controlled Substances Act was written when it was found that the Marijuana Tax act violated the Fifth Amendment and was overturned, the Controlled Substances Act may need to be overturned due to 21st Amendment violations). There are very few Supreme Court cases involving the 21st Amendment, and no one has ever brought up to the Supreme Court the point that the 21st Amendment legalizes intoxicating liquors. The 21st Amendment was ratified in 1933 The drug laws at that time were based on the Harrison Narcotics Tax act, which did not make narcotics illegal but taxed them and limited importation from foreign countries. Around this time most every drug could be bought at a Drug store, and much of the time it would be in syrup form and mixed with Soda. This is where Coca-Cola comes from, which was originally made with the Coca leaf.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Forty_Barrels_&_Twenty_Kegs_of_Coca-Cola
+
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._O_Centro_Espirita_Beneficente_Uniao_do_Vegetal
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, 573 U.S. _ (2014)
http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/13pdf/13-354_olp1.pdf
"It held that the Greens’ businesses are “persons” under RFRA, and that the corporations had established a likelihood of success on their RFRA claim because the contraceptive mandate substantially burdened their exercise of religion and HHS had not demonstrated a compelling interest in enforcing the mandate against them; in the alternative, the court held that HHS had not proved that the mandate was the “least restrictive means” of furthering a compelling governmental interest.
In order to ensure broad protection for religious liberty, RFRA provides that “Government shall not substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability.” §2000bb–1(a).2 If the Government substantially burdens a person’s exercise of religion, under the Act that person is entitled to an exemption from the rule unless the Government “demonstrates that application of the burden to the person—(1) is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest; and (2) is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.” §2000bb–1(b)
Following our decision in City of Boerne, Congress passed the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 114 Stat. 803, 42 U. S. C. §2000cc et seq. That statute, enacted under Congress’s Commerce and Spending Clause powers, imposes the same general test as RFRA but on a more limited category of governmental actions. See Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U. S. 709, 715–716 (2005). And, what is most relevant for present purposes, RLUIPA amended RFRA’s definition of the “exercise of religion.” See §2000bb–2(4) (importing RLUIPA definition).
Before RLUIPA, RFRA’s definition made reference to the First Amendment. See §2000bb– 2(4) (1994 ed.) (defining “exercise of religion” as “the exercise of religion under the First Amendment”). In RLUIPA, in an obvious effort to effect a complete separation from First Amendment case law, Congress deleted the reference to the First Amendment and defined the “exercise of religion” to include “any exercise of religion, whether or not compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief.” §2000cc–5(7)(A). And Congress mandated that this concept “be construed in favor of a broad protection of religious exercise, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this chapter and the Constitution.” §2000cc– 3(g)."
 
About 40 years ago, the Supreme court ruled that an Employer could refuse to hire a Native American on the discriminatory basis of Peyote/Mescaline in their urine. They ruled that if they let Natives do religious peyote ceremonies, then go to work sober but fail a drug test and then have Religious protection in the employment contract, they would supposedly be "Making every man a law unto himself".

But now, they made a ruling that Religious Companies (which are considered people) can make decisions about what their people can and can not put in their body. And they can refuse to obey laws on the basis of Religious belief Regardless of if the belief is "central to or compelled by, a system of Religious belief" meaning it does not have to be part of an Ancient text, just part of your modern belief.

So, what if there is a Native American organization that feels like people that work for them should take peyote, even if they are not Natives? Or what if a Marijuana Dispensary has religious convictions that say they should all smoke at work? They have the same protections that the Christians in Burwell V Hobby Lobby had when they said that they believe contraceptives kill souls, which is not in any Religious book.
 
A lot of people have forgotten how important Plants are to History. Christopher Columbus thought he was going to find a new route to India from Spain, then ended up in the Bahamas and Native Americans had tobacco. Coffee comes from Ethiopia, but spread to the rest of the world through Yemen. Chili peppers come from Mexico, but India now has some of the hottest strains in the world. Black Pepper comes from India.
This is Uziza. It has not been common outside of Nigeria for hundreds of years. It is used to create a soup that stimulates appetite, and it hits the CB2 receptor. It is related to Black Pepper, but has different qualities.
http://www.tropicalappetit.com/Piper-Guineense-Leaves--Uziza-Leaves-1-oz-_p_313.html
 
A lot of people have forgotten how important Plants are to History. Christopher Columbus thought he was going to find a new route to India from Spain, then ended up in the Bahamas and Native Americans had tobacco. Coffee comes from Ethiopia, but spread to the rest of the world through Yemen. Chili peppers come from Mexico, but India now has some of the hottest strains in the world. Black Pepper comes from India.
This is Uziza. It has not been common outside of Nigeria for hundreds of years. It is used to create a soup that stimulates appetite, and it hits the CB2 receptor. It is related to Black Pepper, but has different qualities.
http://www.tropicalappetit.com/Piper-Guineense-Leaves--Uziza-Leaves-1-oz-_p_313.html
Strawberry's, blueberry's and corn also came from the America's. But what does that have to do with Marijuana Creates Jobs?? Maybe the thread title should be Farming Creates Jobs....
 
Strawberry's, blueberry's and corn also came from the America's. But what does that have to do with Marijuana Creates Jobs?? Maybe the thread title should be Farming Creates Jobs....
That post wasn't about Jobs specifically, it was about the importance of Plants in History. I have no idea how you somehow got that I was making a list of plants that come from the America's though, that is not what I was doing at all.

Are you slow? Lol. You misread almost every post you reply to.
 
That post wasn't about Jobs specifically, it was about the importance of Plants in History. I have no idea how you somehow got that I was making a list of plants that come from the America's though, that is not what I was doing at all.

Are you slow? Lol. You misread almost every post you reply to.
No I could have gone on, apples, grapes, wheat and tomatoes the Middle East. And much more if I where to think about it. Potatoes America. :)
 
No I could have gone on, apples, grapes, wheat and tomatoes the Middle East. And much more if I where to think about it. Potatoes America. :)
Have you ever looked at the History of Yams? There are a bunch of Religions based around Yams, in like Africa and South America, and no one knows how they got to be all over the planet, but they are everywhere.
 
Have you ever looked at the History of Yams? There are a bunch of Religions based around Yams, in like Africa and South America, and no one knows how they got to be all over the planet, but they are everywhere.
Never, but I would imagine Native Americans would have brought them here when they came to the America's unless the theory that our continents where attached was true then that is explainable. Either way I imagine there is a logical explanation other than God. Lol, otherwise he would not have let Americans go without weed that evil prick!! :)
 
Never, but I would imagine Native Americans would have brought them here when they came to the America's unless the theory that our continents where attached was true then that is explainable. Either way I imagine there is a logical explanation other than God. Lol, otherwise he would not have let Americans go without weed that evil prick!! :)
I ddidn't say it was God, I said plants are important to History, and the present.
 
Back
Top