Marijuana Myth Busters

sohighifly

sohighifly

Well-Known Member
TWS said:
Oh I see another UB alias. lol. ! I didn't blow up dudes opinions by any means. It was an open discussion on de bunking myths. Which a lot of the OP's myths are not myths. You, with out any knowledge if you are not UB, are defending the biggest bully this sight has.
Click to expand...
I assure you I am not UB, Buck or Ben. I am sorry if you took my personal responses to you and you only as defending the OP(notice I haven't commented on a single persons posts but yours) I find it childish and counterproductive to make comments such as sucking someones dick because they agree with that persons opinions.This is the only reason I have singled you out "so to speak" I feel as grown men and women( which I assume you are one of the two) we can have a debate without demoralizing someones opinion.After all the majority of peoples view of marijuana on this site is strictly opposed by lawmakers, does this in turn make my fight any less valid? And with that I will not pick apart your posts anymore. Like I said I am a little drunk and will probably regret my rude and childish behavior in the morning at which time I will impart a prompt apology(If I do infact feel I have wronged you)


As far as the UB alias I do not know where you come from, but my neck of the woods and where I have been assumptions and putting false claims on people with no proof( i.e. talking out the side of your neck) tends to not work out well for the accuser..Just sayin.
 
chuck estevez

chuck estevez

Well-Known Member
Flaming Pie said:
I'm not even talking about hydro but while we are on the subject, hydro is the most efficient way to grow.

I grow in a soiless medium comprised of peat moss, perlite and lime. Drains very well and is almost impossible to over water. Yet holds moisture for a long time. It is light and airy which allows the roots to grow easier.
Click to expand...
I grew much better bud in pro mix than in ocean forest, with dirt, you should alternate feedings with just waterings, in soiless, i can feed every time at low ppms
 
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
TWS said:
You need to smoke some un flushed hydro before you speak. And yes you can tell the difference between heavly feed soil MJ that has not been flushed compaired to stuff that has been flushed. Everyday fruits and Vegetables are not feed like Mj or as heavy.
Click to expand...
ding ding ding! Why is Marijuana treated different than every other plant, tree on earth?!?? Because your getting sold a bunch of unregulated bullshit lies, nutrients, snake oil and shit that in any other industry would be regulated to protect BOOBS LIKE YOU and me for that matter
 
T

TWS

Well-Known Member
Now your starting to call people names....... ? Because growers are looking for Maximum yields and feeding to do so. An you don't know what I fucking feed So unless you do you should probably shut up before you make even more of an ass out of yourself.
 
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
Ok , This thread is on General Marijuana Growing right? Hydro should be on Advanced or Space Age forum. Soiless and phing sounds like too much trouble. You will achieve amazing results with soil. Why someone would want to make a complicated feeding system is beyond me. How are you PHing? Do you know the actual proper method to PHing? Or do you just stick a calibrated PH pen in the soup like I did?
 
S

sourpuss

New Member
Ok, so you r saying you dont flush, seems like many of you, r u using hydro with chems? If so do you keep the nutes full blast to the end? I drop them to 25 percent 2 weeks left and zero last week.

WHat do you do and it still burns fine? I just want a clean burn and nice taste. I aint a know it all and will try anything once. Educate me pls. Growing in coco handwatered.
 
T

TWS

Well-Known Member
sourpuss said:
Ok, so you r saying you dont flush, seems like many of you, r u using hydro with chems? If so do you keep the nutes full blast to the end? I drop them to 25 percent 2 weeks left and zero last week.

WHat do you do and it still burns fine? I just want a clean burn and nice taste. I aint a know it all and will try anything once. Educate me pls. Growing in coco handwatered.
Click to expand...
This stupid ass thread might not be the place for you to get a educated proper answer.
 
S

sourpuss

New Member
I like the useless hating going on. Im sure you just have to much time on your hands like the rest of us.

Thought these places would b more chill, I guess smoking shitty stuff gets peeps angry. Sucks to b a hater.
 
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
Impman thinks growing in Hydro is Dumb. Impman is a NOOB growing in SOIL. Impman is happy with Impman's results and opinion regarding Hydoponics.
 
T

TWS

Well-Known Member
Impman said:
Ok , This thread is on General Marijuana Growing right? Hydro should be on Advanced or Space Age forum. Soiless and phing sounds like too much trouble. You will achieve amazing results with soil. Why someone would want to make a complicated feeding system is beyond me. How are you PHing? Do you know the actual proper method to PHing? Or do you just stick a calibrated PH pen in the soup like I did?
Click to expand...
Now your trying to back track and say Hydro is not being discussed here when you gave a Blanket statement that PH'ng is a myth.
 
S

sourpuss

New Member
Coco is hydro, but I likey. U no likey thats cool. My smokes the bomb:)

LOve life, enjoy the journey n relax. Your fam will thank you
 
Nullis

Nullis

Moderator
Impman said:
Excuse me, of course. My point is a balanced N-P-K works best for growing marijuana. In essence, try and maintain green and healthy leaves through harvest. I was taught by Ed Growsnothingatall and Jorge's NoGrow bible that is is completely normal for leaves to turn yellow and fall off. They also recommend flushing and a bunch of other nonsense. I could go through both those books and find many more myths than I got posted so far.
Click to expand...
What about a straw man?

You really are quite daft. Just admit it, you didn't really understand the article you posted. I am not the one saying "give your plants a 0-50-30 and the budz will just explodz". The point was you wandered onto a thread in a forum about topics you know absolutely nothing about... just because you noticed the word "potassium" in the title.

Different organic nutrients feature different amounts of various minerals/nutrients including each of the macronutrients (N, P, K). Some have mostly nitrogen, others are higher in phosphorous. Some have seemingly roughly the same amount of N and P (Peruvian seabird guano). And a few things like mined sulfate of potash, blackstrap molasses and kelp meal contain more K... which other meals and guano is often lacking. There is not just a single paradigm for growing anything. There are many.

Now, just like the article you posted said... K (and P) are absorbed more by flowering plants during fruit development.

Impman said:
I sure don't know anyone on here personally. I don't tell anyone I grow. NO ONE. thank you for confirming I am retarded. You should be about done with this thread then, ya? I mean, its 'retarded' right?
Click to expand...
Intellectually disabled** so sorry. And you, for the most part, are the one making it that way.

Funny thing is that I bet you don't even realize the nuances of NPK and fertilizer labeling. Nitrogen is expressed as % "Total Nitrogen" which may be sublisted as % "Water Soluble Nitrogen" and % "Water Insoluble Nitrogen".

Phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) are listed as "Available Phosphate (P2O5)" and "Soluble Potash (K2O)", respectively. That means P & K are actually listed as their oxide equivalents. Were they expressed as Nitrogen were, the PK numbers actually would be lower.
Check it out: http://hubcap.clemson.edu/~blpprt/bobweb/BOBWEB24.HTM
 
T

TWS

Well-Known Member
sourpuss said:
I like the useless hating going on. Im sure you just have to much time on your hands like the rest of us.

Thought these places would b more chill, I guess smoking shitty stuff gets peeps angry. Sucks to b a hater.
Click to expand...
You sir missed the point. You asked a very good question and should be given the right answer. It's guys like Impman that stear people wrong and help kill their plants.
 
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
I would suggest to a new grower to grow in cheap walmart potting soil mixed with perlite, hose water, and Miracle Grow. I also use a 600whps and a AC(ofcourse) . I exchange air and I do not believe in Co2. I do not PH. ALL OF MY LEAVES ARE GREEN 6 WEEKS into FLower. I will NOT FLUSH. I will harvest in 2 weeks at least 500 grams . I know from experience how much I will get. 500 grams is a very low ball estimate if everything went wrong today. stay tuned for bad ass Girl Scout Cookie nugs.
 
Impman

Impman

Well-Known Member
Nullis said:
What about a straw man?

You really are quite daft. Just admit it, you didn't really understand the article you posted. I am not the one saying "give your plants a 0-50-30 and the budz will just explodz". The point was you wondered onto a thread in a forum about topics you know absolutely nothing about... just because you noticed the word "potassium" in the title.

Different organic nutrients feature different amounts of various minerals/nutrients including each of the macronutrients (N, P, K). Some have mostly nitrogen, others are higher in phosphorous. Some have seemingly roughly the same amount of N and P (Peruvian seabird guano). And a few things like mined sulfate of potash, blackstrap molasses and kelp meal contain more K... which other meals and guano is often lacking. There is not just a single paradigm for growing anything. There are many.

Now, just like the article you posted said... K (and P) are absorbed more by flowering plants during fruit development.



Intellectually disabled** so sorry. And you, for the most part, are the one making it that way.

Funny thing is that I bet you don't even realize the nuances of NPK and fertilizer labeling. Nitrogen is expressed as % "Total Nitrogen" which may be sublisted as % "Water Soluble Nitrogen" and % "Water Insoluble Nitrogen".

Phosphorous (P) and potassium (K) are listed as "Available Phosphate (P2O5)" and "Soluble Potash (K2O)", respectively. That means P & K are actually listed as their oxide equivalents. Were they expressed as Nitrogen were, the PK numbers actually would be lower.
Check it out: http://hubcap.clemson.edu/~blpprt/bobweb/BOBWEB24.HTM
Click to expand...
I stopped reading when you called me 'quite daft' ... I am too dumb to read all your words. I think I know what daft means but I'm not really sure. I am going to go smoke a bowl after reading the word 'Daft'. DISCLAIMER: IMPMAN IS A DAFT NOOB. DO NOT FOLLOW THIS ADVICE UNLESS YOU ARE NUTS OR AT THE END OF A ROPE. OR JUST NUTS. GO READ UNCLE BEN POSTS. IMPMAN EATS MESCALINE REGULARLY AND GROWS HOSE WATER MIRACLE GROW WEED. IM ALWAYS HIGH.
 
Nullis

Nullis

Moderator
I don't even understand why they let people like him consistently troll and act DAFT (silly you fucktard, use a dictionary). It really brings this place down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top