Mark Blyth, the economist who's making sense

Status
Not open for further replies.
Padawanbater2 said:
You're arguing it's OK to assault/arrest people for saying they want to kill you or your family when you just admitted you advocate for killing Nazi's

The irony, it burns
Click to expand...

i advocate for killing in self defense.

nazis advocate for killing in the name of "ethnic cleansing".

how fucking retarded are you?
 
UncleBuck said:
nazis who say that jews have no right to exist are not expressing a "political difference"
Click to expand...
Remind me where I said they were..

You're advocating murdering Nazi's who haven't physically threatened you based on your political differences

No different than Jihadis who advocate murdering you who you have never actually physically threatened...

The similarities of both of your ignorance is why world wars happen. You can be trained, and led any which way the leadership sees fit to expend you.
 
We should be reserving violence as a last resort. It doesn't look good on us, it provokes the other side, and it brings more attention to what we might be better served characterizing as a fringe movement.

We should be criminalizing violent ideologies, not creating another one. Preemptively killing Nazis before they act on their ideology isn't sound logic. The punishment must fit the crime.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top