ttystikk
Well-Known Member
https://truthout.org/articles/attacking-income-inequality-by-limiting-wealth/
Limiting CEO pay to a maximum ratio between the lowest paid- or at least average pay- and that of top executives.
It makes a strong case for how this could help society but I'm not sure I agree with the methodology. That's why I posted it here to see what other people think. Is it just fine for CEOs to make over 1000 times what their workers average (Walmart)?
The author seems to think that high taxes on high incomes is not a viable solution, 'because the rich pushed back'- yet he fails to consider that not only will they always do so but also doesn't address how the rich might push back against his proposal.
The ends are just. Are these the right means? If not, what would work better and be more equitable for everyone?
Limiting CEO pay to a maximum ratio between the lowest paid- or at least average pay- and that of top executives.
It makes a strong case for how this could help society but I'm not sure I agree with the methodology. That's why I posted it here to see what other people think. Is it just fine for CEOs to make over 1000 times what their workers average (Walmart)?
The author seems to think that high taxes on high incomes is not a viable solution, 'because the rich pushed back'- yet he fails to consider that not only will they always do so but also doesn't address how the rich might push back against his proposal.
The ends are just. Are these the right means? If not, what would work better and be more equitable for everyone?