11:11 is in relation to human DNA, and is upon the assumption that time exists. Our DNA is Helix's so it's "11" when seen sideways. 11:11 supposedly somehow correlates with DNA. I'mnot a believer in that, just helping out with "What's this 11:11 stuff"
Everyone hand out free trip shit.I say we all party our ass off on that date like the worlds gonna end. Just to have an excuse to. Then when it doesn't, act all shocked that nothing significant happened.
I don't meditate. I just toke me some Mary J and get some THC in my brain and Shiva does the thinking from there.
The Illuminati ain't got shit on the Jews. The Jews would squish them if they tried anything too big.
No, I'm saying what Einstein understood as "Space-time" was really just "Space"
Yet Einstein showed that time is intricately woven into the fabric of space and that we all have our own independent measurements of time all depending on our individual acceleration and positions near a gravity well. It certainly sounds like you are saying Einstein was wrong. How about answering the question about the what happens to time if we no longer orbit the sun?
I'm just looking at it from a different perspective. It still fits what Einstein said. Except for I think that when he was thinking of the speed of light on the bus taking a long time to get to you, that wasn't "light being slowed by time", It was just the lag of your brain interpreting the light that has now taken longer to get to your brain. The light is not actually being "Slowed down" because of your speed, and you do not "age slower" You simply perceive what is going on around you as slower because it is 1. taking longer to get to your eyes 2. Being processed late by your brain. So you are seeing into the past, but not because that act is happening at that moment still, but because you are seeing it after the fact that it has happened because you wee going so fast, and the LIGHT had to catch up, not the TIME.
The only reason I pick it apart is because of the way you say things. You make declarative statements of fact, "time isn't real" rather than "I believe that time isn't real" and when you contradict well supported science, you just sound like a loon.
I explained it as what I believe and said I know it's not what is generally believed. I'm reading the rest of your post now.
In response to the second one. I explained. I BELIEVE...Nothing is slowing down. I don't care what you (or science) SAY is slowing down. From what I can see. Nothing is slowing, and the light is just getting there late because of your speed. And on top of that, your brain is interpreting that late image of light, not whatever is happening in that exact instance. So he just THOUGHT the light was slowing down. But really he was just seeing the late light. Nothing was slowed, everything happened at normal speed, except you. Now that you are going light speed. But still, nothing slows.
Humble yourself man. Don't think you're superior to others on an intelligent level just because you have different beliefs. I'm positive there are "believers" who are way more inteligent then you and me. And yes I understand you said "most", but I still argue against that statement. Where I live nobody can honestly tell who has more inteligence between atheists and theists.
This is the magical point at which all reasonable discourse ceases.
Sorry for having an opinion outside established science. That science wouldn't be established unless people challenged the old establishment with new opinions, that later became fact.
Gotta disagree. At this point science can't even agree with itself. Applied physics and quantum physics for instance, are having a huge issue rectifying themselves with each other. So when science can't agree, who's take do you go with. Problem with depending on established science is your constantly depending on others to do your thought processes for you. Dont misunderstand me, If I'm going to make a bet on something, I'm going to look at what science has at least in theory proven if possible, but I know even then that shits not a sure thing.
Quantum physisists are starting to see that Einstein made some mistakes in his calculations. Even one is final statements was "I may have been wrong about all this"
That may all be true but I don't think shaggy is basing his 'opinion' on the work of quantum physics. He's just talking out of his ass and being contrarian as usual.
Oh I'm sure he is too.
I'M being contrarian? I said these are my personal beliefs and there is no point in arguing them. I am not basing that particular post on anything written in science. Your arguing a pointless point.