sure canMarijuana can treat a number of ills. Why do you have to be dying to medicate.
you dont
and
you dont understand whats being said.
sure canMarijuana can treat a number of ills. Why do you have to be dying to medicate.
so what happened in the Mernaugh case? he was going for Dr's not being the gatekeepers and he lost.court is where it has to be in order to do so....
we have the right to grow
we have the right to make meds and treat ourselves accordingly.
where do our rights not exist in your case?
its just TOO simple which is why everyone is looking to make it difficult when its not.
Good point, you don't have to have your back against the wall to medicate, there are countless ways to use it and a real alternative to pharma crap.Marijuana can treat a number of ills. Why do you have to be dying to medicate.
I haven't refreshed myself with facts yet. Can't believe it's been so long and most of us have still stuck around the forums and became friends, pretty cool. Anyways, what's the back story to this with "we don't have the right" is this where the prescription/authorization confusion with reasonable access?i have asked you to show where you are right that we have the right to this and you haven't posted anything. i asked if you looked at the Mernaugh case and no comment. that case shows where your thinking is wrong.
Dr's are signing or people wouldn't be in the program. it might be hard to find them but it's very possible.
the part you're not looking at is the fight if you get busted.
i am not sure why you are being so hard headed and not looking at what's being said.
why not test your theory then-grow without pinks and let the cops know.
keep us posted.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^@doingdishes
You show a judge your sick...your gold imo...unless your abusing it by selling extra off.
Oh, I'm not arguing that we currently have that right, officially, just that I don't agree and feel I have a valid argument. My interpretation of the charter says autonomy of my body is a fundamental right, having to seek out a willing doctor in an environment that ridicules my health choices is an affront to my dignity and an invasion of my privacy. I have irrefutable evidence of my medical condition, it is degenerative and incurable. I also have proof that cannabis is an effective treatment by the fact that I have not consulted a doctor or needed any of the pills they had me on for over 4 years. Forcing me to find a doctor to give me permission to continue to use a plant with no serious side effects is ludicrous. I'm also not suggesting anyone avoid registering because of my views. I'm just at an age and point in my life where standing up for what I want is more important than worrying about cops and courts. What are they gonna do to an old disabled guy who has no criminal record, anyway?so what happened to matt mernaugh?
https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/02/01/ontarios_top_court_upholds_countrys_marijuana_laws_in_medicinal_pot_case.html
"Among other things, the Appeal Court found the judge was wrong to interpret an earlier ruling as creating a constitutional right to use medical marijuana."
Go grow a set of nuts will ya. Ya fuckin chicken shit baby...if your sick...grow..you are good......now STFU...your lucky you know me or I even talk to you.Agreed. Encouraging others to break the law and grow what they wan't isn't good advice. I can't see any judge dropping a case because gb123 said so.
I get the feeling the board isn't moderated very well. Guys like GB and Hippy should't be the primary posters in the medical section, it makes the rest of us look bad.
I'm not against anyone here. I'd just like to see a different approach.
I think I started it. I have decided I don't need no stinkin' doctor or HC to give me permission to grow or use...and I think our charter backs me up. Other's aren't so sure.I haven't refreshed myself with facts yet. Can't believe it's been so long and most of us have still stuck around the forums and became friends, pretty cool. Anyways, what's the back story to this with "we don't have the right" is this where the prescription/authorization confusion with reasonable access?
Primary posters? where the fuck did you come up with that? The board isn't moderated well? Because you don't agree with the posts? You're doing a pretty good job of making yourself look bad, don't blame others now.Agreed. Encouraging others to break the law and grow what they wan't isn't good advice. I can't see any judge dropping a case because gb123 said so.
I get the feeling the board isn't moderated very well. Guys like GB and Hippy should't be the primary posters in the medical section, it makes the rest of us look bad.
I'm not against anyone here. I'd just like to see a different approach.
I like you ChrisPrimary posters? where the fuck did you come up with that? The board isn't moderated well? Because you don't agree with the posts? You're doing a pretty good job of making yourself look bad, don't blame others now.
Of course we encourage people to break the law...do you think we would have the rights we do now or the impending end of prohibition if we didn't exert some civil disobedience? If the law is unjust, you have a duty to attempt to correct it. We only have rights as long as we demand they are respected.
I guess if you don't like the 'approach' on this board, you should probably look for something a little tamer (disney.com?)....I'm pretty sure we're not going to change for you.
Facts Change !!!ok..so nobody wants to talk facts.
i posted this earlier from THE MERNAUGH CASE!!!
"Among other things, the Appeal Court found the judge was wrong to interpret an earlier ruling as creating a constitutional right to use medical marijuana."
that's from the case itself and has not been challenged.
why go through the hassle of getting busted?? you lose precious resources that you won't get back. if they take your equipment, you don't get it back until the case is over and that could take years...what do you do in the meantime??
why doesn't anyone look at what's being said instead of coming back saying the same thing over and over.
we have the right if we go through the channels.
anyone of you disagree, please grow without the paperwork, let the cops know and keep us posted. i bet you don't get convicted but you sure will go through an expensive hassle and possibly no meds or have to buy them which is more expense.
we have the right to possess and produce if we go through the right channels.
yes they do... but when did they change? no one has challenged it again.Facts Change !!!
Wake up...the rose have a nice smell. I'd say reading between the line could help here. Somewhere Dylan is singing ... " the times are a changin "yes they do... but when did they change? no one has challenged it again.
Your a sitter backer ....some are not. It's just you nature I figure. Your a good guy...just cautious I get that.yes they do... but when did they change? no one has challenged it again.
I sit back??!!Your a sitter backer ....some are not. It's just you nature I figure. Your a good guy...just cautious I get that.