buddster420
Well-Known Member
the my would never exist but it the event they do they would cancel each other out either that or bounce of each other
Mind Bender For You High Thinkers
- Thread starter BongReaper
- Start date
Single White Pistol
Well-Known Member
Hahahaahaahahahahaaa!!!! I like this thread.
buddster420
Well-Known Member
Stoners at their best trying to make sence of things
buddster420
Well-Known Member
I dont the universe was immovable because before the bang it gathered in force and cosmic dust and mass for it to cause the big bang .. Then releasing energy hurdling everything throughout space thus keeping it in motion ..
as for the black hole it might be an unstopable force it pulls anything and evrything it can into it destroying it...
I think there's something more dangerous then a black hole .. I think its called a "Quasar" or "Cuazar" or how ever u spell it
as for the black hole it might be an unstopable force it pulls anything and evrything it can into it destroying it...
I think there's something more dangerous then a black hole .. I think its called a "Quasar" or "Cuazar" or how ever u spell it
Perfextionist420
Well-Known Member
they would both give up fighting each other after like 5 minutes sit down and spark up a fatty and chill
LightFusion
Well-Known Member
i think the objects to us would disappear and the energy resulting from the paradox would destroy parallel universe
canadianreefer
Well-Known Member
If an unstoppable force met an unmovable object, I think the force would just travel around the object without moving it. Kind of like the wind and a car. If there's a parked car outside, it won't really move around in a breeze. The breeze moves around it though, which does not necessarily mean it stops, nor does the car move.
420
Well-Known Member
true and wise
Johnnyorganic
Well-Known Member
Ah, the timeless exercise in logic. A paradox.
An immovable object would require infinite inertia, thus infinite mass. An object of such proportions would collapse under its own gravity.
An irresistible force would require infinite energy. An impossibility in our finite universe.
An immovable object would require infinite inertia, thus infinite mass. An object of such proportions would collapse under its own gravity.
An irresistible force would require infinite energy. An impossibility in our finite universe.
dinkydigger
Well-Known Member
yeah ricochet would make the most sense
= hey look..i guess that is kinda like the the same thing we are talking about...maybe that would happen too....hehe
ANC
Well-Known Member
firstly, there is no such thing as an object... keep magnifying it, and all you end up with is clouds of potential and probability... but nothing physicaly there... unless you look.
Therefor the force would move through the spaces in the "object" if the object itself is unmoveable....
Question... are uni or multiverses just the particulate matter that floats around it or does it include the ether, black matter etc? If so, then space did not exist for the big bang to propagate into...
As to the original question....
Therefor the force would move through the spaces in the "object" if the object itself is unmoveable....
Question... are uni or multiverses just the particulate matter that floats around it or does it include the ether, black matter etc? If so, then space did not exist for the big bang to propagate into...
As to the original question....
WhatAmIDoing
Well-Known Member
Couldn't it bounce? that wouldn't be stopping...
LightFusion
Well-Known Member
well. if the unstoppable force hits the immovable object and conservation of momentum is still good in this case...
then the unstoppable force would become an immovable force and transfer its energy into the object accelerating it to light speed where it would go into a fusion reaction (mass can't move the speed of light, this could cause it to get infinitely hot) and the resulting explosion would wipe out the universe... ?
then the unstoppable force would become an immovable force and transfer its energy into the object accelerating it to light speed where it would go into a fusion reaction (mass can't move the speed of light, this could cause it to get infinitely hot) and the resulting explosion would wipe out the universe... ?
trichopath
Well-Known Member
aren't they both just forms of energy? surely there would be some sort of transference or new energy created? the theory of relativity and the quantum standard model still haven't been joined together. maybe the higgs boson will help tell us,if it exists.
or maybe they would just end up as a big massive bundle of tangled little teeny weeny strings hehe.
or maybe they would just end up as a big massive bundle of tangled little teeny weeny strings hehe.