oneyearorange
New Member
They surrender!
Mind Bender For You High Thinkers
- Thread starter BongReaper
- Start date
oneyearorange
New Member
Theese two things can not exist in the same universe. If you have an unstopable force that means it can move any object. If you have an immovable then no force no matter how unstopable it is will move it. So the answer is neither can exist together in the same dimension. So the question in itself is wrong, because these two things cannot exist at the same time.
oneyearorange
New Member
Well then you would have to look at the word meet. In this case does meet mean that they touch?
stinkincatfish
Well-Known Member
ricochet....
oneyearorange
New Member
theese two things can not exist at the same time thats my answer.
Maybe the real answer is there is no answer.
So there's no answer. Thats the answer.
Maybe the real answer is there is no answer.
So there's no answer. Thats the answer.
Reprogrammed
Well-Known Member
The unstoppable object would simply pass through the atomic structure of the immovable object.
natmoon
Well-Known Member
The question is false as neither existWhat happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?
WhatAmIDoing
Well-Known Member
Both are created only in our minds because of the connotations and denotations of the words "Unstoppable" and "Immovable". There is no such thing as either. Perhaps view from another perspective, minus the two adjectives. As grammar and language were simply creations to describe feelings, ideas, and emotions, these two words are used for ideas. Thus, applying idealogical elements to a realistic environment results in "impossibility".
..I suppose. Now I'll go read what everyone wrote..
WhatAmIDoing
Well-Known Member
Some people have said some thought inducing things. Others have simply rambled senselessly. I geuss both are just what happens.
Lol to the explosion theory.
Okay to the "impossible" theory.
Personally, I view this as an unnecessary conflict of ideas inthought. As this situation has no implication upon my life, no effect rather, It is irrellevant. Perhaps osmosis is possible. Perhaps the atoms thingy--that is, if you want to need an answer. "Unstoppable" and "Immovable" exist in relation to a certain time-view, but in reality are non-existent as viewing time in a different manner reveals a different perpsective on what is good/bad/etc. If you need an example of this, use history. We study it, we scrutinize and say "this was good, this was bad, this was dumb, this was unavoidable", etc. But what about now? Do you say that about the things you are doing at this moment? What? Oh no, you can't. Because you're doing them. Perhaps you can view time in an accelerated fashion to analyze quickly after acting/thinking. Yet they still are seperate. Time's a fun topic... (only, I believe, because it isn't understood in its entirety)
~~Anything seems easy/possible, DUH! when you understand it.
Lol to the explosion theory.
Okay to the "impossible" theory.
Personally, I view this as an unnecessary conflict of ideas inthought. As this situation has no implication upon my life, no effect rather, It is irrellevant. Perhaps osmosis is possible. Perhaps the atoms thingy--that is, if you want to need an answer. "Unstoppable" and "Immovable" exist in relation to a certain time-view, but in reality are non-existent as viewing time in a different manner reveals a different perpsective on what is good/bad/etc. If you need an example of this, use history. We study it, we scrutinize and say "this was good, this was bad, this was dumb, this was unavoidable", etc. But what about now? Do you say that about the things you are doing at this moment? What? Oh no, you can't. Because you're doing them. Perhaps you can view time in an accelerated fashion to analyze quickly after acting/thinking. Yet they still are seperate. Time's a fun topic... (only, I believe, because it isn't understood in its entirety)
~~Anything seems easy/possible, DUH! when you understand it.
WhatAmIDoing
Well-Known Member
The question is still false as i had said before
That's a simplification that may not be understood by some without further explanation.
...but basically
natmoon
Well-Known Member
Lol.
Its ok.
If you wish to try to answer a question that cannot be answered because its completely hypocritical of itself in the first place then be my guest
If you wish to answer the comic book hero style question in a comic book hero way you should have just said that it would invoke the physical laws of our space time continuum and that they would cancel each other out
Its ok.
If you wish to try to answer a question that cannot be answered because its completely hypocritical of itself in the first place then be my guest
If you wish to answer the comic book hero style question in a comic book hero way you should have just said that it would invoke the physical laws of our space time continuum and that they would cancel each other out
Similar threads
