Mitch the Bitch McConnell Wants You To Burn More Coal

Rob Roy · Mar 22, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
So explain this.. The bears require ice to hunt, mate and survive, the ice is melting, decreasing their habitat, so the bears starve resulting in decreased numbers.. If the bears habitat is being affected by ACC, then why would their population increase?

They live near a bountiful Wendys dumpster that hasn't yet been filled with shitty floor scrapings?

Maybe their health insurance plan no longer covers condoms?

I give up, why?

Rob Roy · Mar 22, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
So the media presented something that was incorrect?

You're kidding me...

I have been pretty much throughout this dialogue.

Padawanbater2 · Mar 22, 2015

Rob Roy said:
They live near a bountiful Wendys dumpster that hasn't yet been filled with shitty floor scrapings?

Maybe their health insurance plan no longer covers condoms?

I give up, why?

Rob Roy said:
I have been pretty much throughout this dialogue.

So to recap;

-you deny the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change
-you accept a global conspiracy requiring millions of people
-you believe wealthy individuals with a vested interest in misinforming the American public are more trustworthy and responsible than scientists, some of whom survive on less than $30K/year and others who receive no income at all..
-you believe the polar bear population is increasing, regardless of the evidence..
-you think scientists could publish deception in a peer reviewed scientific journal..
...

Rob Roy · Mar 22, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
So to recap;

-you deny the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change
-you accept a global conspiracy requiring millions of people
-you believe wealthy individuals with a vested interest in misinforming the American public are more trustworthy and responsible than scientists, some of whom survive on less than $30K/year and others who receive no income at all..
-you believe the polar bear population is increasing, regardless of the evidence..
-you think scientists could publish deception in a peer reviewed scientific journal..
...

No. I am stoned and I don't like Polar bears. I think they could be fomenting a conspiracy.

Padawanbater2 · Mar 22, 2015

Rob Roy said:
Yes, there are opposing points of view and opposing motivations therefore

I am not sure of whether there is man made climate change happening on a large scale

the reality is I don't embrace it or deny it....I don't know

Rob Roy said:
I don't know myself about the cause, if any, because it's beyond me to prove or refute it either way.

Rob Roy said:
Again, I'm not confirming or denying anything.

Rob Roy · Mar 22, 2015

Padawanbater2 · Mar 22, 2015

abandonconflict · Mar 23, 2015

Rob Roy said:
I'm not ready to debate whether it is happening or if it isn't, or did man cause it.

But don't let that stop you from writing long winded kkkynesesque diatribes devoid of any pertinent info just to string together a bunch of dull attempts at humor.

abandonconflict · Mar 23, 2015

Padawanbater2 said:
So explain this.. The bears require ice to hunt, mate and survive, the ice is melting, decreasing their habitat, so the bears starve resulting in decreased numbers.. If the bears habitat is being affected by ACC, then why would their population increase?

Hunting restrictions.

abandonconflict · Mar 23, 2015

Rob Roy said:
Ab absurdo? I thought he was like the backup 5th Ninja Turtle?

No, it's the Latin name for appeal to ridicule, which is what your fallacious retort was.

see4 · Mar 23, 2015

Rob Roy said:
Knowing who a persons benefactor is can often lead to an understanding of any underlying motives of the actor.

Sometimes "follow the money" is answer.

Huh? No. Firstly, his question was rhetorical. Second, only your political party and its constituents pull shit like that. Respected members of the science community do their research on the premise of finding accurate solutions to problems or finding factual answers to questions.

Rob Roy · Mar 23, 2015

see4 said:
Huh? No. Firstly, his question was rhetorical. Second, only your political party and its constituents pull shit like that. Respected members of the science community do their research on the premise of finding accurate solutions to problems or finding factual answers to questions.

I don't have a political party. Are you sure you're not being delusional?

Rob Roy · Mar 23, 2015

abandonconflict said:
No, it's the Latin name for appeal to ridicule, which is what your fallacious retort was.

Thank you Donatello.

see4 · Mar 23, 2015

Rob Roy said:
I don't have a political party. Are you sure you're not being delusional?

Quacks like a duck? Yes you do.

MuyLocoNC · Mar 23, 2015

abandonconflict said:
Hunting restrictions.

Total bullshit.

Rob Roy · Mar 23, 2015

see4 said:
Quacks like a duck? Yes you do.

Political parties advocate using force to achieve their goals. Can you find anywhere where I've seriously advocated using force in a non-defensive way?

Barks like a dog up the wrong tree...yes you do, Fido.

abandonconflict · Mar 23, 2015

MuyLocoNC said:
Total bullshit.

Not at all.

MuyLocoNC · Mar 23, 2015

abandonconflict said:
Not at all.

Wow, we've really stumbled on to something here. Hunting restriction reverse the adverse effects of MMGW. Shit, all we need to do is outlaw hunting and we can rest easy and burn them fossil fuels to our hearts content.

Rob Roy · Mar 23, 2015

abandonconflict said:
But don't let that stop you from writing long winded kkkynesesque diatribes devoid of any pertinent info just to string together a bunch of dull attempts at humor.

It's good to know you got my back. Thanks.

abandonconflict · Mar 23, 2015

MuyLocoNC said:
Hunting restriction reverse the adverse effects of MMGW.

Did someone say that? You think NASA and NOAA said 2014 was not the hottest year on record, so we have established that you have a tendency to swear up and down that people said things they didn't.

Mitch the Bitch McConnell Wants You To Burn More Coal

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads