Stark Raving
Active Member
Huh, I'm definitely interested to hear what they say also. I would much prefer composting. I'm a farmer, and would happily do it on my land too. (Keep your money HC, just give me free compost! MUWAHAHAHA!)
$30k delivered and set upHow much is an incinerator like the one in the video?
I was being a bit factitious, but cannabis grown under the new MMPR doesn't concern me or the many other patients here. It is almost a guarantee that the courts will strike the MMPR down as unconstitutional and we'll have legalization for recreational use before they can make changes. I hope for the LP's sake they develop international customers because they won't be getting a lot of business domestically.VIANARCHRIS - I was not talking about the destruction of cannabis grown under MMAR. This is a MMPR thread, and every question here should be directed towards MMPR issues. Funny though. Kgirl - I was not being sarcastic. Incineration is probably the only acceptable method. Good luck with your compost pile, perhaps I'm wrong. itsmehigh - I've been looking at the MediBurn too. However, link you posted is a different product. Which was 18k and which was 30k? Adam@AC - what were the pros and cons of outsourcing waste disposal vs. in-house? Just cost?
This isn't really the place for this debate - but I just have to take the bait. I hope for the sake of all patients that you're right. Everyone deserves the right to grow their own and I don't have any respect for people that don't hold that belief. It's outrageous that the plant is being treated the way it is. That being said, not everyone is so confident about the "guarantee" that it will be struck down. At best, I think MMAR patients will be "grandfathered-in". But let's say you're right - everyone can grow their own and there is recreational use. Not everyone WILL grow their own, and commercial producers will still be held to the same regulations that currently exist for LPs. All to say that there will always be a lot of business domestically.I was being a bit factitious, but cannabis grown under the new MMPR doesn't concern me or the many other patients here. It is almost a guarantee that the courts will strike the MMPR down as unconstitutional and we'll have legalization for recreational use before they can make changes. I hope for the LP's sake they develop international customers because they won't be getting a lot of business domestically.
I recall that, as well. Makes it seem like Conroy is perhaps being a bit misleading about how he presents the case. [pleasedonate]I thought I read they were hoping for Feb.
How do you equate a court date with the attorney being 'misleading'? In his previous update, John Conroy had said he would like to get a date in early February. Unfortunately, the litigants to not get to pick the date the judge hears the case, and he got March 18. It's a little later than we hoped but we'll have a ruling before the 31st and I keep growing. For that matter, I keep growing regardless of a ruling!I recall that, as well. Makes it seem like Conroy is perhaps being a bit misleading about how he presents the case. [pleasedonate]
We discussed this with them after we made it through the first phase (they arrange a phone call where you get to speak with people who actually know stuff). They told us that an anaerobic digestor would be good, so I assume a composter will work. We plan to use a composter system in a locked room, but this is not yet set in stone.Hi everyone, I'm a somewhat recent observer and second-time contributor to this thread. It's been interesting and informative, but seems to have tapered off a bit. Hopefully I can get things going again with this question (hopefully hasn't been asked/answered before): how is everyone planning on "destroying" their waste cannabis?
From what I understand, the 3rd party consent form is you giving permission to whomever is taking your fingerprints, and page 5 of the security clearance application gives HC permission to search your name. HC does not need the 3rd party consent form. At least they haven't ask it form us.Hey guys, anyone run into issues with the updated 3rd party consent to release personal info? They went ahead and changed some things, now a copy must be sent apparently (i followed the original instructions, and I'm sure I'm not alone)
.. "As part of the Security Clearance Application process, each of the individuals identified above will also be required to complete the Security Clearance Fingerprint Third Party Consent to Release Personal Information form that will allow a Canadian police force or a fingerprinting company accredited by the RCMP to submit fingerprints to the RCMP for the purposes of a criminal record check. A list of agencies accredited by the RCMP can be found online. The Security Clearance Fingerprint Third Party Consent to Release Personal Information form can be found online. Health Canada does not need to be provided with a copy of this consent form."
Sooo does the form have to be redone now?
At what point did they decide it had to be submitted and why weren't we notified?!
if anyone can share or shed some light it would be appreciated, HC is slower than ever at responding these days.
I dont see why it would pose any problems with QA, can you elaborate? We plan to grow hydroponically.Thanks Kron. Does the anaerobic digester pose any QA problems? Are you growing with soil? How long did it take from application submission to get your "letter to build"?
By QA problems I only meant that the process of anaerobic digestion involves all kinds of bacteria (I'm not familiar enough to comment with any authority), and seems like it might be a vulnerability in the sanitation program. I'm sure you figured it out though. Sorry to hear about the zoning issue, that must have been very demoralizing.I dont see why it would pose any problems with QA, can you elaborate? We plan to grow hydroponically.
We had to withdraw our application due to zoning issues so we never actually received our letter to build, but I think we were close. We got the request for a phone call after two months or so.