Monsanto cannabis yes or no? The DNA Protection Act of 2013
- Thread starter DNAprotection
- Start date
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
Like Satin stands a chance.
rizzlaking
Active Member
no way in hell. monsanto are pure evil
there like the umbrella corporation only real
there like the umbrella corporation only real
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
Lol, you use Rizzla papers right?
You know they're treated with chemicals and bleached...right?
Some hippy you are...AND there's far more evidence to suggest smoking chemically treated papers is harmful than GM foods.
Doer
Well-Known Member
I only like silk satin.
But, you agree with me. Monsanto could run for President. Already a leader of a War Cult.
Grandpapy
Well-Known Member
Without a doubt and Energy as a running mate, the future is set.
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
Monsanto doesn't need to 'run' for president...Monsanto is king...
On another disturbing note...
[h=2]http://detroit.craigslist.org/wyn/grd/3970052275.html
[/h][h=2]
[/h][h=2]Eagle Seed Forage Soybeans (Livonia) [/h] ATTENTION HUNTERS!!
Have you had the chance to see these "Super Soybeans" on your favorite hunting show? Maybe you've caught an article about them in your favorite hunting magazine. If you haven't yet seen this amazing product I'm surprised because they're the next big thing in the Food Plot industry! Just google them and see, or go to www.growingdeer.tv (hosted by world-renowned wildlife biologist, author, and land management consultant, Dr. Grant Woods). These soybeans can reach heights of 7-10 feet and provide leaf protein up to 42%. The leaves grow 3 times larger than traditional soybeans and stay green longer.
Big Fellow - Roundup Ready
Big Fellow is an extremely tall, very large leafed Roundup Ready forage variety. It has been tested in numerous university trials and is an outstanding high protein, high tonnage producer. Big Fellow is also know for its drought tolerance and indeterminate growth habit which makes it truly rare. It can keep growing through heavy browsing by cattle or deer. It continues providing excellent nutrition later in the year after other varieties have completed their life cycle.
Big Fellow is the superior food for deer and cattle. Big Fellow puts on more than twice as many nodes as a regular soybean. Big Fellow's extra nodes provide more height, tonnage, leaf area, and browse tolerance. This variety is a favorite of silage growers since it has very high feed value, equal to alfalfa.
Large Lad - Roundup Ready
Large Lad is known for it's excellent seed yield and tonnage production. Large Lad plants can reach heights of 84 inches and provide excellent forage for deer and cattle. Large Lad is a favorite of deer hunters since it stays green longer, and has higher protein than regular soybeans. Large Lad is easy to grow and has resistance to many foliar diseases, root rots, stem canker, and races of nematodes. The forage varieties listed on this page are widely adapted to numerous soil types and can withstand tougher growing conditions than regular soybeans.
Wildlife Managers Mix - Roundup Ready
WMM was originally developed for our northern customers; we now have three selections available based on your geography. Wildlife Manager's Mix RR is a custom, niche blend containing both forage types, climbing soybean, and soybean varieties that are tall, high yielding and broadly adapted for your geography. The blend features 4 maturity groups which mature at different times and allow the deer to feed on both mature soybean and green leaf tissue. You will get high tonnage, excellent browse tolerance and great seed yield all in one bag.
Habitat Haven - Roundup ready
HH is a special order item available for specific growing regions and is known for providing excellent deer cover, tonnage, and seed yield. It has a wide range of maturity groups and is easy to grow.
Waterfowl Keeper ($75), Clearfield Sunflowers (1bg will plant 7 acres - $195.00), and DL 110 day maturity Roundup Ready corn (55lb bag will broadcast 3 acres - $199.00) also available.
We do not have a store front so the seed will not be available for pickup. All orders will be shipped directly to you.
**ALL Buyers must have a Monsanto grower ID number prior to picking up seed orders.**
Call Monsanto at 1-800-roundup and select option #3 to get your ID number today.
Michigan Food Plot Services
(734) 564-seven nine eight five
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
| [h=1]Glyphosate toxicity to humans: An overview[/h] Friday, August 02, 2013 by: Lance Devon |
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041464_glyphosate_Monsanto_toxicity.html#ixzz2auWg5cye
(NaturalNews) Monsanto's infamous Roundup contains the hotly debated compound called glyphosate. This merciless herbicide is also found in 750 or more U.S. products. An herbicide like this infiltrates the landscape and accumulates in mammals, especially bone, hindering cellular detoxification along the way.
A destroyer, glyphosate annihilates a plant's building blocks of life, tearing apart amino acids. By disrupting the "shikimate pathway" in plants and microorganisms, glyphosate creeps inside leaves and stalk, raping natural life processes. Glyphosate also destroys the beneficial microorganism in the human gut, destroying the human immune system.
To make matters worse, glyphosate is often mixed with adjuvants - chemical agents that increase glyphosate's destructive power. It's often mixed with surfactants and foaming agents that allow the liquid to bond to and penetrate the structures of a plant's leaves. This mass infiltration has created a chemical environment.
[h=1]Glyphosate's existence welcomes GMOs[/h]Glyphosate's mere existence has led scientists to develop Roundup-Ready seeds which are genetically modified to resist the glyphosate. This has allowed an up-rise in engineered food, which the human body cannot naturally process. Farmers can now plant the genetically engineered crop and spray their fields simultaneously with glyphosate. Weeds are expected to die and terminator crops are engineered to withstand the chemicals. This has led to global food dominance by corporations like Monsanto, who push their genetically altered food onto Third World countries all under the guise of "feeding world hunger." Now farmers feel that they must depend on these chemical companies for seed, and are cornered into using herbicides like glyphosate to have a more productive crop.
The production of glyphosate has led the world down a dark course. The human body was intended to eat unmodified, natural food. Chemical-laced, genetically engineered science has manufactured a new-age frontier of food that is wiping out small organic farmers from the picture. As science takes a short cut and eradicates the fields, it globalizes food production. Small organic farmers who work hard to protect the balance of the ecosystem and purity of food, have felt the squeeze global chemical companies are putting on their ability to provide whole food. Glyphosate is a danger to the future of organic farmers, who seek an herbicide-free environment to grow pure and wholesome food.
[h=1]EPA continues to allow higher glyphosate levels on crops and in humans[/h]As if it were working directly for Monsanto and other chemical giants, the EPA continues to permit more glyphosate into the ecosystem. According to pre-1985 studies, detectable levels of glyphosate in animals was nearly non-existent. By 1985, glyphosate levels were appearing in animal meat tissue, fat, eggs and milk. At that point, the EPA assigned an acceptable tolerance level of glyphosate in mammals at 0.5 ppm. The EPA quickly moved to establish an acceptable daily intake of glyphosate for human consumption. At that time, they set the ADI at 0.10 mg per kg body weight per day. However, by 1993 this acceptable daily intake had been renamed to be called a "reference dose" and had gone up to 20 times the previous daily limit to 2 mg per kg body weight per day.
How is the EPA to be trusted for safety, as they continue to cater to biotech demands?
According to the nonprofit group, Beyond Pesticides, in May of 2013 the EPA ruled to double allowable limits for glyphosate in several key crops, increasing the limits for glyphosate exposure to 100 parts per million (ppm) in crops grown for animal feed, and 40 ppm in oilseed crops.
[h=1]Glyphosate stays in the bone[/h]In some of the first studies in the 90s involving rats, 30-36 percent of glyphosate was passed through the animal's gut wall and into their bodies. A similar study on hens and goats got likewise results. In the rat study, seven days after the glyphosate was administered, the remaining glyphosate levels were found in the rats' bones. In a WHO publication, "the glyphosate isotope was widely distributed throughout the body, but was primarily found in bone."
With these findings, it seems that EPA regulators have missed the point. Glyphosate, regardless of what limits are set, sinks into human organs and accumulates, creating a toxic environment for the human body. The EPA's "reference dose," is a hoax. A "reference dose" does not take into consideration the long term accumulation of glyphosate in a mammal's organs, especially bone. Here's a question: Since bone's major constituent is calcium phosphate, how might glyphosate, which acts as a fake phosphate in plants, manipulate bone growth?
Sources for this article include:
http://www.rag.org.au/modifiedfoods/rounduphealthissues.htm
http://northernwoodlands.org
http://www.beyondpesticides.org/dailynewsblog/?p=10487
Doer
Well-Known Member
On horror of lea shore and a pox on the Jonah that brought us this doom.....
This my friend is what passes for science among the hippies...See how the plant and all life is Holy.
A destroyer, glyphosate annihilates a plant's building blocks of life, tearing apart amino acids. By disrupting the "shikimate pathway" in plants and microorganisms, glyphosate creeps inside leaves and stalk, raping natural life processes.
When something is Holy it is religion.
When you follow religion you proselytize
When you proselytize, you forget your ethics
When you forget you ethics you screw over poor dumb farmers
Don't screw over the poor dumb farmers.
This my friend is what passes for science among the hippies...See how the plant and all life is Holy.
A destroyer, glyphosate annihilates a plant's building blocks of life, tearing apart amino acids. By disrupting the "shikimate pathway" in plants and microorganisms, glyphosate creeps inside leaves and stalk, raping natural life processes.
When something is Holy it is religion.
When you follow religion you proselytize
When you proselytize, you forget your ethics
When you forget you ethics you screw over poor dumb farmers
Don't screw over the poor dumb farmers.
DNAprotection
Well-Known Member
| [h=1]Yet another reason to go organic - Research verifies it really is more nutritious[/h] Friday, August 02, 2013 by: Carolanne Wright |
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041456_organic_food_improved_nutrition_health_benefits.html#ixzz2avK8P63U
(NaturalNews) While it's generally agreed in the natural health arena that organically produced fare is superior in safety compared to crops that utilize GMOs or chemical pesticides, the fact that it's more nutritious might be overlooked by consumers. Conventional growers insist there isn't a substantial difference between the two, yet several studies have found otherwise.
[h=1]The science behind nutrient rich organic edibles[/h]In the battle between conventional versus organic, research has shown the latter to be the victor with higher levels of vitamins and minerals as well as conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and omega-3 fats.
Nutritional profile of organic compared to conventional crops
After reviewing 41 published studies examining the nutritional content of conventional and organically grown crops, certified nutrition specialist Virginia Worthington discovered organic food rated significantly higher. Findings include greater levels of vitamin C (27 percent), iron (21.1 percent), magnesium (29.3 percent) and phosphorus (13.6 percent). She also notes that organic crops had lower nitrates and heavy metal contamination. Worthington's results can be found in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine.
Likewise, a study led by Alyson Mitchell at the University of California-Davis found free radical scavenging flavonoids were notably higher in organic tomatoes. Over the course of ten years, organically produced tomatoes were compared to their conventional counterpart. The organic fruit was shown to contain between 79 and 97 percent more flavonoid, aglycones, quercetin and kaempferol than conventionally grown tomatoes.
Variance in milk fatty acids between organic and conventional farming practices
A study in the Journal of Dairy Research investigated the chemical composition of milk sourced from conventional and organic dairy sheep and goats in Greece. One hundred and sixty two milk samples were taken over three months. Results showed fat content was lower in the organic milk compared to conventional. Additionally, the researchers discovered:
"Milk from organic sheep had higher content in MUFA, PUFA, alpha-LNA, cis-9, trans-11 CLA, and omega-3 FA, whereas in milk from organic goats alpha-LNA and omega-3 FA content was higher than that in conventional one. These differences are, mainly, attributed to different feeding practices used by the two production systems."
According to the study, organic milk has a greater nutritional value (due to its fatty acid profile) compared to conventional milk when "produced under the farming conditions practiced in Greece."
Similar results were found with cow's milk. A team of researchers at the Institute of Food Science and Nutrition in Piacenza, Italy evaluated the fat composition of organic bulk milk as well as conventional. Once again, organically produced milk had higher levels of CLA. "The animal diet appears to be the factor which has the highest effect on the CLA concentration in milk and milk products and an organic diet based on fresh or dried forage, that is rich in CLA precursory fatty acids, may improve the yield of fatty acids with beneficial effects on health."
Sources for this article include:
http://science.naturalnews.com
http://science.naturalnews.com
http://online.liebertpub.com
http://pubs.acs.orgx
"Nutritional Quality of Organic Versus Conventional Fruits, Vegetables, and Grains," by Virginia Worthington, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2001 (pp. 161-173)
NLXSK1
Well-Known Member
Eggs were bad, now they are good. Coffee was bad, now it is good. Alcohol was bad now a glass of wine an evening is good. FFS they just came out and said that salt in the amount of 2-3 teaspoons a day is not harmful after a decades long campaign about hardening of the arteries and other made up bullshit about salt.
The stuff DNA protection is putting up is so full of rhetoric that it affects the believability of the articles. Talk about raping and world dominance, etc... Just laughable.
Could this thread just die of GMO poisoning please? Someone spray a herbicide on it STAT!!
The stuff DNA protection is putting up is so full of rhetoric that it affects the believability of the articles. Talk about raping and world dominance, etc... Just laughable.
Could this thread just die of GMO poisoning please? Someone spray a herbicide on it STAT!!
Harrekin
Well-Known Member
You know the "Journal" of Alternative and Complimentary Medicine is a "mickey mouse journal"...right?
Yet another reason to go organic - Research verifies it really is more nutritious
Friday, August 02, 2013 by: Carolanne Wright
Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041456_organic_food_improved_nutrition_health_benefits.html#ixzz2avK8P63U
(NaturalNews) While it's generally agreed in the natural health arena that organically produced fare is superior in safety compared to crops that utilize GMOs or chemical pesticides, the fact that it's more nutritious might be overlooked by consumers. Conventional growers insist there isn't a substantial difference between the two, yet several studies have found otherwise.
The science behind nutrient rich organic edibles
In the battle between conventional versus organic, research has shown the latter to be the victor with higher levels of vitamins and minerals as well as conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) and omega-3 fats.
Nutritional profile of organic compared to conventional crops
After reviewing 41 published studies examining the nutritional content of conventional and organically grown crops, certified nutrition specialist Virginia Worthington discovered organic food rated significantly higher. Findings include greater levels of vitamin C (27 percent), iron (21.1 percent), magnesium (29.3 percent) and phosphorus (13.6 percent). She also notes that organic crops had lower nitrates and heavy metal contamination. Worthington's results can be found in The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine.
Likewise, a study led by Alyson Mitchell at the University of California-Davis found free radical scavenging flavonoids were notably higher in organic tomatoes. Over the course of ten years, organically produced tomatoes were compared to their conventional counterpart. The organic fruit was shown to contain between 79 and 97 percent more flavonoid, aglycones, quercetin and kaempferol than conventionally grown tomatoes.
Variance in milk fatty acids between organic and conventional farming practices
A study in the Journal of Dairy Research investigated the chemical composition of milk sourced from conventional and organic dairy sheep and goats in Greece. One hundred and sixty two milk samples were taken over three months. Results showed fat content was lower in the organic milk compared to conventional. Additionally, the researchers discovered:
"Milk from organic sheep had higher content in MUFA, PUFA, alpha-LNA, cis-9, trans-11 CLA, and omega-3 FA, whereas in milk from organic goats alpha-LNA and omega-3 FA content was higher than that in conventional one. These differences are, mainly, attributed to different feeding practices used by the two production systems."
According to the study, organic milk has a greater nutritional value (due to its fatty acid profile) compared to conventional milk when "produced under the farming conditions practiced in Greece."
Similar results were found with cow's milk. A team of researchers at the Institute of Food Science and Nutrition in Piacenza, Italy evaluated the fat composition of organic bulk milk as well as conventional. Once again, organically produced milk had higher levels of CLA. "The animal diet appears to be the factor which has the highest effect on the CLA concentration in milk and milk products and an organic diet based on fresh or dried forage, that is rich in CLA precursory fatty acids, may improve the yield of fatty acids with beneficial effects on health."
Sources for this article include:
http://science.naturalnews.com
http://science.naturalnews.com
http://online.liebertpub.com
http://pubs.acs.orgx
"Nutritional Quality of Organic Versus Conventional Fruits, Vegetables, and Grains," by Virginia Worthington, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2001 (pp. 161-173)
In other words, it's about a scientific as beating a horse with a shoe...
Someacdude
Active Member
http://ec.europa.eu/food/international/organisations/codex_en.htm
get rid of this, the fda which is a joke anyway, the ama , most allopathic doctors and the world would be a better place.
Science is many peoples god, just not mine.
get rid of this, the fda which is a joke anyway, the ama , most allopathic doctors and the world would be a better place.
Science is many peoples god, just not mine.
