chiefchuckles
New Member
Yeah, your wrong on the flushing.
Yeah, your wrong on the flushing.
Yeah, your wrong on the flushing.
Point taken Nothingreallymatters. Technically I use Dyna-Gro in hydro and change out my nutes once/week. What I think is being discussed about the flushing myth is giving
plants no nutes at all for up to 2 weeks, not simply refreshing your growing media/regimen. But I would say plants would do better w/a 2 week flush in soil vs hydro.
I heard about 2 other possible myths: Tilling/breaking up the soil before starting new plants & the over fertilization myth (both looking into). I heard about the "tilling myth"
decades ago and how even colonists wasted a bunch of time and effort tilling the soil and it actually being counter productive for their crops.
Oh, and also to add another myth I found today: sunlight is magnified by the water drop on the leaf to cause a leaf burn. This is only true for hairy type leaves and when
the sun is low on the horizon. To this day I've yelled at my bro for doing this outside. Still I heard it's best to water after sunset or before sunrise, though watering during the
day may not be a death sentence for the plant.
Well, actually I do flush. But not the last 2 weeks. I do it 16 times during my 16 week/4 month grow cycle in hydro. So I win 16-2.
Here's some myth propagation (or is it misinformation?):
[video=youtube;9sr58DBJ0Dw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sr58DBJ0Dw&feature=related[/video]
I was talking out of my ass there.. Ive grown hydro my whole life using the same synthetic nutrients.. i agree completly same nutrients and minerals only derived and introduced differently. maybe the chleating agents make a difference.. ive heard some can be petroleum based..?? ive never tested the theory. flushing makes a difference in hydro and ill leave it alone