Who chooses when the Voltaire quote is applicable, and when not? Quis custodiet custodes? cnI don't know what's more stupid, neo-nazism, riu condoning it, quoting Voltaire in this context, or liking that post. Really NOT appropriate, NOT applicable, it's not a goal by itself...
Fuck me... Idiocracy is here.
"I'm not no limburger"
Roquefort. It's French for "you rock hard!""I'm not no limburger"
WHO SAID we condone it?I don't know what's more stupid, neo-nazism, riu condoning it, quoting Voltaire in this context, or liking that post. Really NOT appropriate, NOT applicable, it's not a goal by itself...
Fuck me... Idiocracy is here.
hhhmm.. Umadbro?I don't know what's more stupid, neo-nazism, riu condoning it, quoting Voltaire in this context, or liking that post. Really NOT appropriate, NOT applicable, it's not a goal by itself...
Fuck me... Idiocracy is here.
At first I thought what a silly and irrelevant question, but I see now that in the age of idiocracy such a person could be useful. See, back when people where capable of using their brains, they really didn't need someone to choose for them when it's not applicable to neo-nazism - it was fucking obvious.
One moment please, let me get my Idiocracy-speak translator.... Ah ok, "mad" isn't applicable either, but your misplaced use of the quote is an insult as much to Voltaire, the human brain, and millions of people who have died.
At least you actually watched the movie
I already lost when I read your stupid misplaced use of Voltaire's quote and others liked it as if it were clever... My suggestion to you would be to smoke LESS bowls and re-read what 'you' wrote... though if you're dumb enough to quote Voltaire in regards to neo-nazis in the first place it's probably never going to sink in.Smoke some more bowls, and re-read what you wrote... if it still doesn't sink in.. then YOU win
It's as dumb as taking the bible literally. Is that a trick question?
Add "would be" to my comparison if it got your panties in a twist (censoring, not deleting, deleting, condoning, was implied/suggested in several posts, and 'would be' imo as downright stupid as quoting Voltaire in this context.) 
There, I liked your post so you don't feel left out. Feel better?At first I thought what a silly and irrelevant question, but I see now that in the age of idiocracy such a person could be useful. See, back when people where capable of using their brains, they really didn't need someone to choose for them when it's not applicable to neo-nazism - it was fucking obvious.
One moment please, let me get my Idiocracy-speak translator.... Ah ok, "mad" isn't applicable either, but your misplaced use of the quote is an insult as much to Voltaire, the human brain, and millions of people who have died.
At least you actually watched the movie
I already lost when I read your stupid misplaced use of Voltaire's quote and others liked it as if it were clever... My suggestion to you would be to smoke LESS bowls and re-read what 'you' wrote... though if you're dumb enough to quote Voltaire in regards to neo-nazis in the first place it's probably never going to sink in.
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." is supposedly not even actually a quote from Voltaire (google...) but likely based on something he said in his Essay on Tolerance: "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too."
In any case, do you think that if Voltaire would have lived after WWII he would have suggested to give neo-nazis (and similar) a platform or even the light of day??
One more attempt: if some group in your city protests because they want to rape your dog, eat your wife and burn your children, would you defend their right to say it till death as well?
Is that a trick question?
Of course... I go to a coffeeshop I haven't been for nearly a decade and the pinball machine is called... Cirqus Voltaire
View attachment 2688592View attachment 2688594View attachment 2688595
No snickers but I have a box of Payday candybars. they are my fave.
You needed a translator for "Umadbro".. I guess you don't get out as much.. Gotta keep up with the "Idiocracy" slang terms bro, since society isn't as smart as you areAt first I thought what a silly and irrelevant question, but I see now that in the age of idiocracy such a person could be useful. See, back when people where capable of using their brains, they really didn't need someone to choose for them when it's not applicable to neo-nazism - it was fucking obvious.
One moment please, let me get my Idiocracy-speak translator.... Ah ok, "mad" isn't applicable either, but your misplaced use of the quote is an insult as much to Voltaire, the human brain, and millions of people who have died.
At least you actually watched the movie
I already lost when I read your stupid misplaced use of Voltaire's quote and others liked it as if it were clever... My suggestion to you would be to smoke LESS bowls and re-read what 'you' wrote... though if you're dumb enough to quote Voltaire in regards to neo-nazis in the first place it's probably never going to sink in.
"I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." is supposedly not even actually a quote from Voltaire (google...) but likely based on something he said in his Essay on Tolerance: "Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too."
In any case, do you think that if Voltaire would have lived after WWII he would have suggested to give neo-nazis (and similar) a platform or even the light of day??
One more attempt: if some group in your city protests because they want to rape your dog, eat your wife and burn your children, would you defend their right to say it till death as well?
Is that a trick question?
Of course... I go to a coffeeshop I haven't been for nearly a decade and the pinball machine is called... Cirqus Voltaire
View attachment 2688762View attachment 2688763View attachment 2688761
This is not a right. Υour rights stops where the rights of the others begin. This poses a great threat to society, MY family & democrasy itself. I didn't see this group you guys talkin about but if it was a bunch of people talkin about their dislikes for a race of people or somethin like that, personally i don't find it the same with your quoted words above. I can like or dislike whoever i want & for any reason i want. I can dislike people who wear hats if i want becauze i don't like hats or just because... But i can't vilified publicly/murder/rape them.
BTW Sativied, got nothing against you, i'am also on my MANRAG~ Just blowing off some stupidity online
love the avatar~
Amazing... So instead of realizing Voltaire is not applicable here you reduce neo-nazism to something not a threat to democracy, society, families ? (your selfishness is blinding you, bringing it close to home was the entire point of my example...)
A liberal point of view I much respect, however, that does NOT mean one should be tolerant towards intolerance. Freedom of speech and democracy are not goals, they are means to an end, 'a civilized society'. Being tolerant in any way towards neo-nazis may seem to fit shape-wise, it doesn't fit in the picture - at all. Which your own morals and logic should tell you instead of letting that override but some clever misplaced quote.
Your poor high-school-yard level responses ("umadbro, are you on your period?") are at most entertaining but I don't do grudges anyway. As far as I'm concerned, what happens in TnT stays in TnT. And no, your ego getting a dent doesn't mean mine got a bump.BTW Sativied, got nothing against you, i'am also on my MANRAG~ Just blowing off some stupidity online
cheer$
Some other idiot is going to read that, think it's clever, and repeat it in the same context. It's like going forward in time and seeing people thinking 2 girls and a cup is a cooking lesson... wouldn't you speak up?Cannawizard said:
