New Acura NSX vs Lamborghini
- Thread starter RyanTheRhino
- Start date
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
I gotta say Acura stepped its game up
Acura estimated $ 33,000 0 to 60 4.5s
Lamborghini $350,000 0 to 60 3.1s
Acura estimated $ 33,000 0 to 60 4.5s
Lamborghini $350,000 0 to 60 3.1s
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
man, i don't know what to say.. i loved the old nsx, i hated that chevy completely stole the design for the new vettes, but i'm not too crazy about the new one, that's for sure.. 
Gastanker
Well-Known Member
I have to agree with racer here. I loved the old nsx but the new one looks like shit imo. Looks like a Cadillac fucked an Audi R8 and the baby ended up with all of the ugly components and very few of the attractive ones. Of course this speaks nothing of performance - wouldn't be surprised if it performed better than the lambo.
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
dude i just looked up the price and they are saying $33,000 , that's lower then a regular Acura i don't get it. But if its true then that shit beats the lambo price/performance by along shot.
http://www.infotechnoplus.com/car/2013-acura-nsx-price.html
http://www.infotechnoplus.com/car/2013-acura-nsx-price.html
Gastanker
Well-Known Member
Eh, the old NSX was 100k+. A 2003 NSX in good condition is around 45k. If the 2013 NSX is actually 33k it'll be, by far, the best value sports car out there. Easily will beat the lower end Porches, all of the non M series BMWs, all of the American cars including the corvette at that price... I think they forgot to put a 1 or 2 before the 33k.
RawBudzski
Well-Known Member
Ill take the lambo for the bitches.
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
well it is only a v6 but with 400 hp
racerboy71
bud bootlegger
i think they left the one off of the front of that number easily..
there is no way that thing is going for any less then 100k... not saying you didn't see if for that price, just saying some one fucked up quoting the price is all..
phillipchristian
New Member
LMAO! A Caddy fucked a Audi. Nice. It does have the same front end as the R8. That is a sweet car. I've always loved Audi's. Used to have an RS6 a while back. Sweetest car I ever owned.
Still think the Lambo would outperform that Nissan though.
DSB65
Well-Known Member
for 33,000 you could get you a couple...lol...i think they left the one off of the front of that number easily..
RawBudzski
Well-Known Member
I would not want to be in a traffic accident in it though..
Gastanker
Well-Known Member
Eh, the old NSX was 100k+. A 2003 NSX in good condition is around 45k. If the 2013 NSX is actually 33k it'll be, by far, the best value sports car out there. Easily will beat the lower end Porches, all of the non M series BMWs, all of the American cars including the corvette at that price... I think they forgot to put a 1 or 2 before the 33k.
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
maybe that is the production cost lol. that article was saying how it shouldn't even be called a sports car with only 400 hp. but it has hybrid motor so it has massive torque for take off then switches to gas at higher rpm.
RawBudzski
Well-Known Member
Base Model will be 33,000 I bet..weak sauce model... for the badass shyt I bet it will be 70k + with the optional upgrades..
Gastanker
Well-Known Member
Only 400 hp? I keep forgetting how over powered yet heavy cars are getting. I've always thought of my BMWs as being sports cars but none of them comes close to 400hp... I thought 'sports' meant great handling... 'super' would be the word in my mind that signifies over the top HP. Or perhaps 'muscle' - great on a strip but shit around a corner.
RyanTheRhino
Well-Known Member
BMWs are pretty much all luxury cars
I think a few of the more expensive M, and z seires would qualify tho
