echelon1k1
New Member
Obama has nominated John Brennan to lead the company and Chuck Hagel as his next Sec/Def. - http://www.smh.com.au/world/obama-makes-controversial-picks-for-security-team-20130108-2cdd7.html
Brennan shouldn't even be a consideration considering his inept handling of information during the aftermath of Neptune Spear. I've never seen an agency "veteran" look so ignorant & uninformed during a press conference. At such a pivotal time in the agencies history, Bazza nominates this bloke? (i suppose it does make sense, as he's been a yes man unlike, McCrystal & Petraeus)
Chuck Hagel i feel is a great choice for Sec/Def. He could do alot in the way of strengthing ties with Middle east states and bringing about peace.
He's also one of the few not bought and paid for by the "Israel First Lobby". If the US decides to back aways from its close ties with Israel, as Obama's actions have indicated, that could be seen as a peace offering by Mid East states, which could go along way in repairing it's damaged image. It also makes sense as Israel offers the US no strategic, military or economic advantage, where as other mid east states can.
What's everyone else think?
Brennan shouldn't even be a consideration considering his inept handling of information during the aftermath of Neptune Spear. I've never seen an agency "veteran" look so ignorant & uninformed during a press conference. At such a pivotal time in the agencies history, Bazza nominates this bloke? (i suppose it does make sense, as he's been a yes man unlike, McCrystal & Petraeus)
Chuck Hagel i feel is a great choice for Sec/Def. He could do alot in the way of strengthing ties with Middle east states and bringing about peace.
He's also one of the few not bought and paid for by the "Israel First Lobby". If the US decides to back aways from its close ties with Israel, as Obama's actions have indicated, that could be seen as a peace offering by Mid East states, which could go along way in repairing it's damaged image. It also makes sense as Israel offers the US no strategic, military or economic advantage, where as other mid east states can.
What's everyone else think?