Obama released detainee from Gitmo - Now terrorist leader in Yemen

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
While detained at Guantanamo in 2003, Qosi was asked why he stayed true to bin Laden for so many years. According to JTF-GTMO, Qosi explained it was his “religious duty to defend Islam and fulfill the obligation of jihad and that the war between America and al Qaeda is a war between Islam and aggression of the infidels.”

Qosi made it clear in AQAP’s new production that he hasn’t changed his opinion in the twelve years since.

http://www.longwarjournal.org/archives/2015/12/ex-guantanamo-detainee-now-an-al-qaeda-leader-in-yemen.php

Obama likes to take credit for killing Osama Bin Laden. I wonder if he will accept responsibility for creating a new one. It doesn't appear our president has a problem with al Qaeda at all. Just like everything else Obama does; it's all smoke and mirrors, defending Islam, and putting our nation's security at risk. A fish rots from the head down. What used to smell fishy is starting to get real, real funky.
 

Jimdamick

Well-Known Member
All I know is that all those Gitmo guy's that were released for Bergdorf are walking dead men anyway, with a drone named for every one. What would you have done? Left an American soldier a prisoner ? And as far as Obama "defending Islam" , someone has to separate the crazies from the main stream Muslims, who have never been an issue, until the West started to fuck with them. Yea, the attitudes of France, GB, Italy, Israel and the US by invading Muslim countries might have something to do with the shit we are going through now. Ever think of it that way? (That rotten fish shit is new to me, where did you get that one from?)
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Funny how occupying the rest of the world can create unintended consequences and blowback.

Until the USA minds its own fucked up business, there will always be a war(s).

Of course maybe CONTINUOUS WAR is the real foreign relations strategy for the Military industrial complex run USA...


Found on line -

"Major defense contractors Raytheon, Oshkosh, and Lockheed Martin assured investors at a Credit Suisse conference in West Palm Beach this week that they stand to gain from the escalating conflicts in the Middle East.

Lockheed Martin Executive Vice President Bruce Tanner told the conference his company will see “indirect benefits” from the war in Syria, citing the Turkish military’s recent decision to shoot down a Russian warplane."
 

Oregon Gardener

Well-Known Member
Funny how occupying the rest of the world can create unintended consequences and blowback.

Until the USA minds its own fucked up business, there will always be a war(s).

Of course maybe CONTINUOUS WAR is the real foreign relations strategy for the Military industrial complex run USA...


Found on line -

"Major defense contractors Raytheon, Oshkosh, and Lockheed Martin assured investors at a Credit Suisse conference in West Palm Beach this week that they stand to gain from the escalating conflicts in the Middle East.

Lockheed Martin Executive Vice President Bruce Tanner told the conference his company will see “indirect benefits” from the war in Syria, citing the Turkish military’s recent decision to shoot down a Russian warplane."
Yup. That about sums it up.
 

Not GOP

Well-Known Member
Funny how occupying the rest of the world can create unintended consequences and blowback.

Until the USA minds its own fucked up business, there will always be a war(s).

Of course maybe CONTINUOUS WAR is the real foreign relations strategy for the Military industrial complex run USA...


Found on line -

"Major defense contractors Raytheon, Oshkosh, and Lockheed Martin assured investors at a Credit Suisse conference in West Palm Beach this week that they stand to gain from the escalating conflicts in the Middle East.

Lockheed Martin Executive Vice President Bruce Tanner told the conference his company will see “indirect benefits” from the war in Syria, citing the Turkish military’s recent decision to shoot down a Russian warplane."
Was 9/11 a provoked attack, or did AL Qaeda declare war on us?
Forget about the rest of the world, you won't stay safe.
Turn a blind eye, then you'll die
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Was 9/11 a provoked attack, or did AL Qaeda declare war on us?
Forget about the rest of the world, you won't stay safe.
Turn a blind eye, then you'll die

There are several schools of thought regarding 9/11. None of them seem to justify the cost in human lives to me.

Some people think a bunch of thugs hijacked some planes and flew them into buildings. If they are correct, the response of invading Iraq AND Afghanistan was a fail. Letters of marque or something similar could have been used, rather than getting bogged down in two nonsensical wars.

Some people think 9/11 was a government false flag. If they are correct, you're right, you won't be safe. Then again, this is a pot site, you should already know what shitheads your government is. It's not like they haven't proposed false flags in the past.

Still others think that decades (centuries?) of foreign intervention in the middle east helped to create 9/11. Many have turned a blind eye to that and dismiss it, but never really say why. For instance if foreign soldiers occupied your neighborhood, how would you like that? How would you respond ?

Also, I'm not part of any "us" if that "us" gives me no choice whether or not to be a part of it or not. I'm nobodies slave.
 
Last edited:

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Was 9/11 a provoked attack, or did AL Qaeda declare war on us?
Forget about the rest of the world, you won't stay safe.
Turn a blind eye, then you'll die
Yes, 9/11 was a provoked attack.

There were a number of warnings by Osama and others stating there'd be huge consequences if America didn't pull it's troops of out Saudi Arabia (their holy land).

Mess with the bull, you get the horns.
 
Top