Oh Goodie! ... More on 911 (inside job) :)

Status
Not open for further replies.

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
[URL="http://www.911blogger.com/node/21721"]Did Training Exercises Prevent Andrews Air Force Base From Responding to the 9/11 Attacks?[/url]
While discussing the 9/11 attacks, in 2004, Paul Hellyer, a former Canadian minister of national defense, posed the question, “Why did airplanes fly around for an hour and a half without interceptors being scrambled from Andrews [Air Force Base] … right next to the capital?” He said: “With a quick-reaction alert they should have been in the air in five minutes or 10 minutes. If not, as a minister of national defense, which in the United States would be the secretary of defense, I would want to say, ‘Why not?’” [22]
His questions are as pertinent today as they were five years ago.
:hug:
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
911 and what is happening now is all interrelated ... the elite wouldn't have been able to loot the treasury as easily as they have without 911. That's why the truth must be generally known.
I agree most are asleep at the wheel and will suffer greatly when the walls come crashing down. But 911 is a big link pin in all the corruption that is going on in Washington.
bongsmilie
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Ok, A truck with a mural of an airplane crashing into new york city was pulled over and it was found to have a huge amount of explosives in it. Pffft that has nothing to do with 911, pure coincidence. NOT!! The fact that they are Israeli and were sent to DOCUMENT the EVENT. Holt shit, do you need a bigger smoking gun?
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Which then begs the question. Why would they do this? Does Israel have enemies? Who are they? Where do they live? Is anyone over there killing Israel's Enemies?
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Which then begs the question. Why would they do this? Does Israel have enemies? Who are they? Where do they live? Is anyone over there killing Israel's Enemies?
I hear ya ... Israel seems to be part of this story. I don't know if you were around during the watergate hearings ... every major network had it on ... and it got better rating that the regular programs ... can you image the ratings they would have with a real public investigation with subpoena power and prison time for perjury? Man ... I would be glued to the TV.

Well folks my technical difficulties ... and sorry for that double post by the way ... were that my computer died on me ... turn out to be the mobo board ... services for the dearly departed where held last Friday, with friends and immediate family ... I bought and installed a new mobo ... got all the tweaking and troubleshooting done ... now I'm back and ready to continue "The 911 News Update":mrgreen:
The site below has a lot of links to a lot of issues important to the average American. The federal reserve ... election fraud ... 911 ... lot of interesting stuff ...
http://bushstole04.com/911/reasons_doubt_911.htmReasons to Doubt the Official Story about the 9/11 Attacks
Reasons to Doubt the Official Story about the 9/11 Attacks
The Bush Regime

by Andrew Mills
The more you study the facts and the circumstantial evidence surrounding the 9/11 attacks, the more you doubt the official explanation of the attacks given in the 9/11 Commission Report. Most all the necessary information is, or has been, available through the major media. It's just a matter of pulling it all together and organizing the data. When you do that, you are left with major doubts about the official story and you begin to suspect that some of our officials may have been involved, at least in the sense that they had fore-knowledge of the attacks and just let them happen.


Here's something else from the site ...
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies
Gordon Duff Salem-News.com
How long have we watered the Tree of Deceit with the blood of patriots?
(CINCINNATI, Ohio) - In John Farmers book:The Ground Truth: The Story Behind Americas Defense on 9/11, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version... is almost entirely untrue...
The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.



http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=15892Osama bin Laden Responsible for the 9/11 Attacks? Where is the Evidence?

The idea that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks has been an article of faith for public officials and the mainstream media. Calling it an “article of faith” points to two features of this idea. On the one hand, no one in these circles publicly challenges this idea.
On the other hand, as I pointed out at length in two of my books – 9/11 Contradictions1 and The New Pearl Harbor Revisited,2 no good evidence has ever been publicly presented to support it.
Tony Blair's Weak Document
The FBI's Surprising Statement
The 9/11 Commission
The "Bin Laden Confession Tapes"
Conclusion
David Ray Griffin is professor emeritus at Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Graduate University.



Here's Alex Jones being interviewed by RT about ...

http://eclipptv.com/viewVideo.php?video_id=8162US a powerslave serving aims of New World Order

bongsmilie





 

wyteboi

Well-Known Member
All the families who lost loved ones are really in on the conspiracy?



THAT is the fuckin point .... You or anyone else find me ONE family member from ANY one of those planes that day ?
that will not be happenin anytime soon , because you cant. There is no proof of that one , and that is just one of at least 10 questions i have seen you just look over or say its uncredible. Then u refer to the truthers as "nut jobs" and half the folks on here asking YOU direct questions , are not even "truthers" .... i cant be one if i dont know right? we are just regular folks asking a few questions that you CANNOT answer . So all people with Q's about politics are "nut jobs" right?
i just dont get why you are pushing us to believe something that you cant even understand yourself?
 

wyteboi

Well-Known Member
If you've got this tiny bit wrong....what else is wrong?


The fall of the 47-story World Trade Center building 7 (WTC 7) in New York City late in the afternoon of Sept. 11, 2001, was primarily due to fires, the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced today following an extensive, three-year scientific and technical building and fire safety investigation. This was the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building, the agency stated as it released for public comment its WTC investigation report and 13 recommendations for improving building and fire safety.
If you've got this tiny bit wrong....what else is wrong?
:wall:
 
K

Keenly

Guest
some news came out today, ill wait for gr to post it



basically government officials admitting there were explosives....


you guys are going to love it
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
The day after it happened Peter Jennings interviewed one of the survivors. Listen as she tells about the BASEMENT blowing up. Just more proof of explosives.

[youtube]TSGZYP--wz0[/youtube]
 

FreeLeaf

Active Member
I have read through a few of these posts and I found it strange that all of the people that are 9/11 truthers are in fact either progressives, liberals or liberal activists. I wonder how these quasi socialists would have reacted if we would have been attacked during the Clinton administration? I tell you what would have happened. Nothing. You would have not heard a peep from them. Hell it might have even encouraged them to fly an American flag out front of their home. That is because they are politically motivated. These types of people try and exploit a true American tragedy because of their hatred towards those that disagree with them on political issues. Now I am not referring to your average Democrat, I am referring to the true wack jobs. The people who's hatred is so intense that it drives them to become a 9/11 truther. But what is really ironic is that these wack jobs hated Bush so much for taking us to war in the middle east, that they spoke of conservatives as being war mongers and baby killers as they all lined up to vote for a truly radical Democratic candidate for president. What they did not know is that a Democratic president was in the White House during the war of 1812 (we declared war), Jefferson Davis, The president of the confederate states of America who succeeded from the union was a Democrat, Wilson (D) who took us to war in WW1, FDR (D) for WW2, Truman (D) the Korean war and finally Johnson (D) Vietnam. Being a peace loving Capitalist, I tend to vote Republican.
Speak freely while you still can. The Obama truth squad may be listening !
 

jfgordon1

Well-Known Member
I have read through a few of these posts and I found it strange that all of the people that are 9/11 truthers are in fact either progressives, liberals or liberal activists.!
I'm going to go ahead and disagree with this statement. I would say most of us "truthers" are Conservatives/independents/Constitutionalists.

Total opposite.
 

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
I have read through a few of these posts and I found it strange that all of the people that are 9/11 truthers are in fact either progressives, liberals or liberal activists.
Generalize much?

You are VERY wrong!! I would say that about 10% are socialists, the rest are just average middle of the line folks. Plenty of independents, Libertarians, conservatives and right wing nuts too. Most of the truthers do not post anywhere else in the politics section anyway so how you can deduce what their political views are is beyond me. Broken brain?

If you have only read 3 posts of the 2,319 available you are sure to FAIL at any generalization you make. And since you are so adept at classifying people's politics , can you please go ahead and classify me? What way do I lean?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top