On 5/11/2012, the DEA goes on trial for blocking medical cannabis research

What??! Already 134 views and not ONE COMMENT???! This is HUGE! :clap: This does EXACTLY what I wanted to achieve with a lawsuit! Excellent news. In liu of the recent DEA F%$!@& with that student they held for 5 DAYS WITH NO FOOD OR WATER, the testimony should be heavily scrutinized. :-o
 
link doesnt worked but i looked it up on google, i hope they make some real changes soon!


Link works ok for me, here's the content of that PDF.

Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies​
1215 Mission Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95060 USAPhone: +1 (831) 429-6362 Fax +1 (831) 429-6370​
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEMONDAY, MAY 7, 2012CONTACT:​
Allen Hopper, Criminal Justice and Drug Policy Director, ACLU of CaliforniaContact via Communications Director Laura Saponara: 510-367-8453​
U.S. APPEALS COURT TO HEAR ORAL ARGUMENTS IN CASECHALLENGING DEA’S DENIAL OF LICENSE FOR MEDICALMARIJUANA PRODUCTION FACILITY​
On Friday, May 11, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston, Mass., will hearoral arguments in a federal lawsuit against the Drug Enforcement Administration for denying Universityof Massachusetts-Amherst Prof. Lyle Craker a license to grow marijuana for privately funded medicalresearch. The arguments are the culmination of nearly 11 years of legal and administrative proceedingsseeking to end the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) monopoly on the supply of marijuana forresearch.The lawsuit is a response to an August 15, 2011, final order issued by the DEA rejecting a DEAAdministrative Law Judge’s 2007 recommendation that it would be in the public interest to grant Crakerthe license. A laboratory at the University of Mississippi funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuseis currently the only facility in the U.S. permitted to grow marijuana for research.Craker is represented in the case by Washington, D.C., law firm Covington & Burling LLP and theAmerican Civil Liberties Union.Craker first applied in June 2001 for a DEA license to start a marijuana production facility at theUniversity of Massachusetts-Amherst under contract to the Multidisciplinary Association for PsychedelicStudies (MAPS), a non-profit research and educational organization whose mission includes developingmarijuana into an FDA-approved prescription medicine. Prior to Craker’s application, NIDA had refusedto sell marijuana to two FDA-approved MAPS-sponsored protocols, preventing them from taking place.In September 2011, NIDA refused to sell marijuana to a third FDA-approved MAPS-sponsored protocol,this one in 50 U.S. veterans with chronic, treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD),preventing it from taking place. MAPS and Craker are working to open the door for privately funded drugdevelopment studies conducted under FDA regulations.Despite increasingly widespread recognition of marijuana’s therapeutic benefits and formal policies in 17states and the District of Columbia, the federal government still insists that marijuana is a dangerous drugwith no medical value. Even if MAPS and Craker’s efforts to open the door for privately funded,federally regulated non-profit medical marijuana research are successful, it will likely take a decade formarijuana to become an FDA-approved prescription medicine. In the meantime, getting PTSD patientsaccess to the treatments they need will depend on the continuing success of state-based medical marijuanapolicy reform.​
DOCKET TO BE CALLED FRIDAY, MAY 11, 2012 AT 9:30 A.MCOURT OF APPEALS PANEL COURTROOM, 7TH FLOORBEFORE JUDGES: Torruella, Lipez, Howard09-1220​
Lyle E. Craker v. Drug Enforcement Administration
Appellant 15 min. Appellee 15 min.​
###The Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit research andeducational organization that works with government regulatory agencies to develop whole-plantmarijuana into an FDA-approved prescription medicine.More information is available at​
www.maps.org/research/mmj.The Petitioner’s Reply Brief in Lyle E. Craker v. Drug Enforcement Administration is available at
www.maps.org/mmj/dealawsuit/2012.05.04_Craker_Reply.pdf.
 
Bump...

They both get 15 minutes to talk, hopefully they see judges who don't have their heads up their asses...Be interesting to see the lawyer/s representing the DEA...scumbags.
 
Good always prevails over evil.

Hope some hardcore DEA agents go to jail for a long time. They can rethink their cause in a cage, then get a new line of work.
 
Good always prevails over evil.

Hope some hardcore DEA agents go to jail for a long time. They can rethink their cause in a cage, then get a new line of work.

OOOOhhh for some reason reading that made me all tingly inside :). But it seems the northeast of America is Fed Country nowadays (See Cuomo and his federally indu¢ed medical marijuana 180), so......
 
OOOOhhh for some reason reading that made me all tingly inside :). But it seems the northeast of America is Fed Country nowadays (See Cuomo and his federally indu¢ed medical marijuana 180), so......

I don't know if it's a blessing or curse there's so many meth labs popping up where I am. On one hand I don't want that shit anywhere around me or people I know. On the other it's keeping the DEA in my area too busy to give a fat flying fuck about pot.
 
The government has been growing pot for research purposes for over 50 years. Recently I saw a video on YouTube where a physician wanted to do some research and petitioned the government agencies for marijuana for medical research, he was denied, several times. He later found out that our wonderful government refuses to supply cannabis for testing purposes if the basis for the research is for anything other than to substantiate any harmful effects.
 
The government has been growing pot for research purposes for over 50 years. Recently I saw a video on YouTube where a physician wanted to do some research and petitioned the government agencies for marijuana for medical research, he was denied, several times. He later found out that our wonderful government refuses to supply cannabis for testing purposes if the basis for the research is for anything other than to substantiate any harmful effects.


I posted this before and it still applies today:

http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/r...DA-04-014.html
Which is a Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
grant that specifically points to cannabis use as a 'illness or disorder'!
PURPOSE OF THIS RFA
The National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) is seeking grant
applications focusing on the identification, evaluation and development
of safe and effective pharmacological treatments for cannabis-related
disorders (CRDs), such as cannabis abuse or dependence, and cannabis-
induced disorders (e.g., intoxication, delirium, psychotic disorder,
and anxiety disorder), and their comorbidity with other medical and
psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression), with special interest in the
treatment of children and adolescents. Cannabis use includes marijuana,
hashish, and other tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) containing substances.

Now please pay close attention to the dates (specifically, the release date):
Also, the AGENCIES participating in the grant!
MEDICATIONS DEVELOPMENT FOR CANNABIS-RELATED DISORDER
RELEASE DATE: December 1, 2003
RFA NUMBER: RFA-DA-04-014 - (Reissued as RFA-DA-09-001)
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)
PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATION:
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
(http://www.nih.gov)
COMPONENT OF PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATION:
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
(http://www.nida.nih.gov)
CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER: 93.279
LETTER OF INTENT RECEIPT DATE: February 20, 2004
APPLICATION RECEIPT DATE: March 23, 2004

The very SAME US Gov agency that calls out marijuana use as BAD, gets granted U.S Patent #6630507...in Oct 2003!
Just check out US Patent# 6,630,507 titled “Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectants” which is assigned to The United States of America, as represented by the Department of Health and Human Services.
Now if one agency of the government is denying that cannabis has "Any medical benefit"...and the Department of Health and Human Services gets issued a U.S. PATENT ON ITS MEDICAL BENEFITS...HOW on earth can the gov keep trying to push that same old lie to everyone?
How blantantly does our gov need to lie to us before we finally call them on it? Seriously.
 
An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law. – Martin Luther King Jr.

If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so. – Thomas Jefferson
 
Back
Top