wyteberrywidow
Global
Shit i would expect a 600 watt led to outperform a 600 watt hps if i paid 2000+ dollars for it.I would be a fool if it didnt.
You keep comparing watt for watt, what about the manufacturers claims and that other dudes claims that a 90w UFO is equal to a 400w-600w HPS?
Yeah I think they should....but still no proof lol
mY POINT THE ONLY THING THAT COMES UP IS THE MH WHICH I SAID 5+ TIMES ALREADY IT IS NOT IDEAL FOR FLOWERING
Yeah thats what he said not what he did.He continued to flower under the 400 mh.End result was 400 mh not 400 hps.And here the grower specifically states he is changing bulbs over for flowering......
http://www.icmag.com/ic/showpost.php?p=3371153&postcount=189
Yeah thats what he said not what he did.He continued to flower under the 400 mh.End result was 400 mh not 400 hps.
I'm reading page by page..... Another benefit LED has over hid, no handling of multiple bulbs...![]()
Now i have to say what???Go look at hobbes new study easily pulling 1.5 gram per watt with 1 600.So ihn your opinion, had the dude used an hps lamp for flowering, how much more could he have yielded? Keep in mind, he got .69 gram per watt in soil.... Go ahead and make your guess. I could Google and find more grows to support my satisfaction with LED lights but why bother? I can care less that you are not convinced. If you think a hid bulb is going to pull a gram per watt you got another think coming. We've seen an LED lamp do it, now why don't you show proof that an hid lamp can do a gram per watt?
I'm waiting....
that's all I'm asking...