mile.high
Well-Known Member
Saw how worked up everyone got about me saying who some lady worked for and just couldn’t resist.
Properly flush weed vs unflush weed
- Thread starter NoobgrowerLbc
- Start date
mile.high
Well-Known Member
Hey man since you obviously read this “study” in full, can you tell me their method of “flushing”? Did they flush to runoff? If so, what %?
xtsho
Well-Known Member
You apparently didn't.
"Cannabis growers implement a flushing period where only water is fed to plants in the final days to weeks before harvest."
mile.high
Well-Known Member
I did, that sentence doesn’t say shit. How much water was fed? What size was the container?
I thought this was a “rigorous” study.
Has it been published anywhere? Has it been peer reviewed?
Wattzzup
Well-Known Member
Why do you care so much? 11 years here and this brings you out of retirement
Flush away. No one cares
Rurumo
Well-Known Member
You'll find that every decent grower here disagrees with you. You obviously aren't mentally flexible or self aware enough to let go of your bro-science bias. I get it, you probably learned this early, and just continued flushing through every grow-ignorance is bliss, so they say. But now, put on your "logic cap." Really give the idea of flushing a good hard think and try to see the logical absurdity of it. This study only confirmed what every good grower already knew. Try admitting to yourself that some of these amazing growers here who agree with the conclusions of this study know something that you do not. Don't let your ego get in the way of your personal progress as a human being or cannabis grower.
mile.high
Well-Known Member
They fooled you all. Cannabis “nutrient” companies have been over pushing their wares for years. Their old tricks stopped working, so they put this shit out to appeal to the “bro science” crowd, who mostly wouldn’t know science if it bit them on the ass so it worked.Why do you care so much? 11 years here and this brings you out of retirement
It’s not even a study.
Wattzzup
Well-Known Member
Cool so you’re right? Can we move on and you go back where you came from? Come back in 11 more years
mile.high
Well-Known Member
Again, I didn’t say anything about what you’re arguing with. Keep smoking that schwag.
mile.high
Well-Known Member
If y’all want to say I’m right, then ya I’m ok with that.Cool so you’re right? Can we move on and you go back where you came from? Come back in 11 more years
xtsho
Well-Known Member
You're funny. How much advanced education have you had?
Not a study:
SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
mile.high
Well-Known Member
I can put headings on my drivel too.
CONCLUSION
I probably should have used the word scientific in my last post.
Rurumo
Well-Known Member
I'm satisfied that no impressionable young lad or lass will stumble across this thread and prevent their precious first crop of weed from growing to its genetic potential by flushing it at the end of it's life cycle. Mission accomplished. Good day to you Sirs.
I SAID GOOD DAY!
I SAID GOOD DAY!
mile.high
Well-Known Member
I love your interpretation of this study. I’m surprised you can write because you certainly can’t read. Enjoy spending 20% more on bloom nutes.
MICHI-CAN
Well-Known Member
Sigh and Tiffed I see. Enjoy the discussion. Not the dissection.
mile.high
Well-Known Member
You can’t dissect this research because they didn’t conduct an appropriate trial or publish any of their methodology.
xtsho
Well-Known Member
Google the ladies name. She has a very extensive and impressive background. She's not even at RX Technologies anymore. She's VP of Development at Pebble Labs doing work that you wouldn't even begin to understand.
It's obvious that you don't know what science is.
Why are you still here anyway? Do you actually think that you're going to convince us that your smarter and know better then the PhD that conducted the study that you don't think is a study? You obviously know absolutely nothing about science. The individual that did the study is a scientist with a PhD. But you know better.
I'm going to help you out. Here's a science for kids website. It has lessons starting at the first grade level all the way through high school. You're welcome.
Science for Kids
Kids learn about science including educational subjects biology, chemistry, physics, earth science, astronomy, environment, genetics, and more. Activities, questions, and experiments for students and teachers.
www.ducksters.com
MICHI-CAN
Well-Known Member
Nor would I. My grow is not there. LOL. LOCATION! Decades and chronic indulgence across most medias lead me to my best methods. As if you could copy me at your house with my style. LMFAO.
Whatever works. Still funny soil based flush. LOL.
Grow more. Bicker less.
PEACE.
mile.high
Well-Known Member
Didn’t know you were all fucking this same lady. Might wanna get checked out I doubt that bk guy is clean.Google the ladies name. She has a very extensive and impressive background. She's not even at RX Technologies anymore. She's VP of Development at Pebble Labs doing work that you wouldn't even begin to understand.
It's obvious that you don't know what science is.
Why are you still here anyway? Do you actually think that you're going to convince us that your smarter and know better then the PhD that conducted the study that you don't think is a study? You obviously know absolutely nothing about science. The individual that did the study is a scientist with a PhD. But you know better.
I'm going to help you out. Here's a science for kids website. It has lessons starting at the first grade level all the way through high school. You're welcome.
Science for Kids
Kids learn about science including educational subjects biology, chemistry, physics, earth science, astronomy, environment, genetics, and more. Activities, questions, and experiments for students and teachers.
The research can’t be repeated as published.