You seem to know everything that the bill says DON KANE.
If you're asking me if I can read, the answer is yes I can read and yes I've read prop 19.
Have you taken the opportunity to pay attention to what it doesn't say?
Clearly I have not paid attention to what prop 19 doesn't say. lol
Cause it sure doesn't say that 5x5 would be the minimun but it doesn't say that each county can decide their own limits.
Sure it does.
prop19 said:
Cultivate, on private property by the owner, lawful occupant, or other lawful resident or guest of the private property owner or lawful occupant, cannabis plants for personal consumption only, in an area of not more than twenty-five square feet per private residence or, in the absence of any residence, the parcel. Cultivation on leased or rented property may be subject to approval from the owner of the property. Provided that, nothing in this section shall permit unlawful or unlicensed cultivation of cannabis on any public lands.
prop19 said:
such larger amounts as the local authority deems appropriate and proper under local circumstances, than those established under section 11300(a) for personal possession and cultivation, or under this section for commercial cultivation, processing, transportation and sale by persons authorized to do so under this section;
See. Local authorities can make laws allowing for higher limits on possessing and cultivation.
now if you read between the lines
I prefer to read what is on the lines. Because that is the actual law being proposed. What is in between the lines will not be on the law books.
that means that the mayor and or city counsel could simply not adopt these new laws, after all its still illegal federally.
No. That's not true at all. A law passed by the people in an election is the law. It's not optional. It's not a suggestion that a mayor or city counsel can ignore on a whim. The law is the law.
Yes, it's still illegal federally. That means the city counsel could call in the feds on you. But they can do that now as well.
I guess I'm not understanding your point here. Are you saying that we should vote against prop 19 because certain things that are illegal now will stay illegal? That doesn't make any sense.
I admire your optimistic attitude, but truth and logic is always gonna trump HOPE.
I'm using logic, not hope. I'm directly citing my information from the actual text of the law. Not hearsay and speculation.
so lets all hope that the politicians backing this bill have our best interest at heart
Pretty much every state politician is staying far away from prop 19. It's a lose-lose situation for them to give an opinion on prop 19. Either way all it would do is piss off some voting demographic. Politicians aren't the people backing prop 19.
