smellzlikeskunkyum
Well-Known Member
CBD is what you want for knockout/pain killing stuff. If you want some "go do something" then you want a higher thc to cbd ratio
No offense


CBD is what you want for knockout/pain killing stuff. If you want some "go do something" then you want a higher thc to cbd ratio
I would love to try one of the new High Cbd strains. I was in an accident back in august, and can't use my right arm still, I'd love a strain that was actually supposed to be for painkilling. My WW is pretty good, so I can't complain, but would be neat to see the differance. Night time meds is really what I could use. The WW is great during the day, but at night sometimes it actually seems to keep me awake.
White Rhino blew my brain away. I'm still searching for it 3 years later... Unbelievable stuff! But the stuff I had wasn't GHS it was Nirvana's WR.
I'm off the iv stuff only had that in the hospital, but I've been on time release pills since august. I've already asked them to phase me down once, I'm hoping to only be on it another 1-2 months max. I suppose that will depend on how bad I'm still hurting at that point, and possibly on what any of my new strains can do for me. I've got about 3 new strains I just put in the trays for the first time, and another 3 I'm in the process of germinating and sprouting. I'm hoping I find some keepers to go along with my Widow. I really feel like I got lucky with that one, it was a single freebie seed I got that started it all.
also this seems relevant...ive heard that back in the day the average thc content being around 6 percent or ten or whatever was actually the whole bud ground up and tested so 6 percent of the total weight was thc where as now they got smart and are testing extracts or kief so the thc percentages havent gone up by more than double but instead the other matter in the test has been reduced to show a higher thc percentage..so it may be that some companies are doing it old school and coming in at around 13 percent and then another guy with the same thc content gets his tested without green matter and shows a 23 percent thc content.....idk the validity of this but remember i saw it somewhere where i was prone to believe it...
You are just wrong.
jogro seems to think the old average 8 percentish thc tests were in part due to inferior samples with seed and stem (thats what i took from part of his post)
First of all, since there is no regulation of the cannabis ceed industry, sellers can basically make any claim they like, and I can state for a fact that at least some of the published number sellers claim are pure BS. There is no need for sellers to doctor samples, when they can just doctor their published numbers!which i believe was part of what i said maybe they arent using kief or extracts to raise the percentage but something is going on here because i refuse to believe that marijuana in the last 20 years has become twice as potent lol thats just ridiculous...to think no company out there is doctoring their samples in the way of removing seed and stem or removing more leaf than normal or selecting only choice nugs and so on is straight naive.
OK, you're asking about testing, and this is complicated; beyond the ability to answer well in a few lines in a quick post: But briefly:
-There is no regulation/certification of cannabis testing labs, say the way there is with medical labs. Some labs are bad, and there is an incentive for both the lab and the consumer of the lab's services to want as high a number as possible. So in general numbers tend to skew upwards.
-How testing is done is variable; the same exact SAMPLE tested at different labs can yield different results, in some cases considerably different. EG: Some labs report THC as a percentage of sample weight, others as a percentage of dry weight. So even between samples tested at different GOOD labs, you have to compare different numbers with a big grain of salt.
-Many seed sellers pull their reported THC numbers right out of their butts. You should be highly skeptical of any listed number by a seed-seller, ESPECIALLY if they haven't posted a third party lab report to back it.
-Even the same strain can yield a fairly wide range of THC numbers depending on pheno, grow conditions, when its harvested, when and how its tested.
-Comparing testing from 20-30 years ago to testing today isn't really appropriate. Not only are test methods different today, but back then testing was almost exclusively done by gov't or research agencies, who were testing confiscated samples with stems, leaves, and seeds. Today most testing is done by vendors on highly manicured top seedless buds only.
If you take the better lines from 20+ years ago, grow them seedlessly, trim them appropriately and test them today, a lot of them DO hold up in terms of potency. For example, in my sig you can see a test report of some Williams Wonder grow out from 20+ year old seeds that just tested in at 25% total cannabinoids, making it comparable to many of the potent "kush" strains of today.
On the original question about potency, the MAIN determinant of potency, obviously, is the quantity of cannabinoids in what you're smoking (ie how much THC, etc).
But the RATIOS of cannabinoids are what determine the QUALITY of the effect. For example strains that have significant amounts of CBD to go with their THC are going to feel much more "stoney" and can feel subjectively much more potent than strains with no CBD and higher THC levels. Its these different ratios that separate so called "indicas" from "sativas" and explain why different strains subjectively affect people differently.