Remote Scottish Grow

NorthofEngland

Well-Known Member
In the Highlands and Islands of Scotland there are thousands of abandoned buildings.
Everything from one room crofters cottages to sizable upper class retreats.
The area has experienced severe depopulation over the last 300 years. Starting with the 'dispersal of the Clans' in the 1700's, up to the youth of the area heading to the cities to find work, over the last few decades.
Farming is far less manpower intensive than it used to be, and most of the areas jobs are connected to farming.
Tourism employs some on a seasonal basis but permanent employment is a rarity.

Because of the chronic depopulation of many places, the Scots government are very generous with the grants they award to anyone who applies for help from the home improvement fund.
It is possible to find an area that attracts you. Find an abandoned cottage in a remote and secluded location. Then live in a tent or caravan whilst renovating the building.
Gradually it will be possible to use parts of the house and, bit by bit, move from the tent to the home.

Some parts of the Highlands and Islands have the lowest density of population in Europe.
Some of the Islands and towns attract retiree's, people qualified enough to work from home and others. These places, despite being low by European standards, have higher populations and, as such, the local authorities are less desperate to attract settlers and less generous with the housing grants.
Other areas, such as Sutherland, mainland Scotland's most northerly county, are extremely underpopulated. This county has so many Lochs (lakes) and Bens (hills/mountains) to so few residents that it is possible to choose an abandoned home on an area of land that provides a Loch, a Ben and a Wood all of your own!
There are also islands with no residents still living there. From the relatively large and distant St Kilda (where the entire population was evacuated to the mainland in 1930) to many tiny specks of land that have the derelict homes of 2 or 3 former residents.

My dream is to find a remote and secluded spot with a good source of fresh water, a nearby wood and a lack of neighbours.
Although an Island seems more isolated I would imagine that the appearance of an individual settler would cause gossip which led to concerned neighbours sailing over to offer assistance.
The locals, in the North of Scotland, are very friendly, helpful and honest.
Doors remain unlocked and, often, small shops simply leave a sign apologising for no shopkeeper but asking customers to leave payment in a box or a bucket.

An isolated part of the mainland may be an easier place on which to remain undisturbed.
Whenever I went to buy supplies I would explain how I was there to concentrate on 'my writing' and emphasize how much I needed isolation.
No doubt any rural shopkeeper would perpetuate the desired gossip faster than a fibre optic internet connection could manage it!

Then, after a short time to learn the local ways and rhythm, I would start to plan an outdoor grow....
 

NorthofEngland

Well-Known Member
The OUTDOOR GROW....
Would it be better to plant lots of small patches?
Say....4 to 8 plants, disguised by planting along tree lines on in clearing within a wood....?

OR
Just GO FOR IT! and plant a full field?

The idea of 'Several patches' have the disadvantage of spreading potential discovery to many different places.

The 'field' could be spotted from the air.

A disguised poly tunnel, on an island, in a lake, on the mainland....
(Islands in lakes are not that uncommon. Some have castles or manor houses built on them. They are the most romantic locations imaginable.
Like living in the fantasy of a 12 year old boy!)
 

EGrower

Well-Known Member
i would experiment if it is like you say it is it wouldn't be a problem to plant a few fields and have a few patches of 4-8 plants on the side. If your planting a field just make sure not to leave any evidence behind that can incriminate you. The first thing you should do is find a strain that will grow sufficiently in the climate over there. This might be a hard thing to do but once you find one it will be all worth it.
 

vostok

Well-Known Member
With the future of Scotland in the balance, you have to ask yourself is it wise to move North, when 90% live South for a very sane reason, and yes I do now a bloke that can grow bananas on the West Coast of Scotland, where the water temp rarely falls below 8c, should Scotland be getting its freedom from the UK, it will row to EU with begging bowl for admittance, whilst the vast majority of the UK, seems the want to be free of the 'United Sates of Europe shit', those crofts go cheap for a very good reason,...keep digging ....lol
Most cannabis growers are moving in the opposite direction ....Spain and Portugal ...where its legal, and the weather ain't bad either ....lol
 

NorthofEngland

Well-Known Member
i would experiment if it is like you say it is it wouldn't be a problem to plant a few fields and have a few patches of 4-8 plants on the side. If your planting a field just make sure not to leave any evidence behind that can incriminate you. The first thing you should do is find a strain that will grow sufficiently in the climate over there. This might be a hard thing to do but once you find one it will be all worth it.
I'm thinking Durban
It's from a similar distance to the equator and is supposed to grow best in Northern climates.
I would start them under glass, to avoid late frosts.
They would hopefully have grown big enough, during veg, to have enough size to carry buds - when photoperiod triggers flower phase.

Or I could look into AUTO's....???

This is just a dream/plan
Maybe when I'm older.....
 

NorthofEngland

Well-Known Member
With the future of Scotland in the balance, you have to ask yourself is it wise to move North, when 90% live South for a very sane reason, and yes I do now a bloke that can grow bananas on the West Coast of Scotland, where the water temp rarely falls below 8c, should Scotland be getting its freedom from the UK, it will row to EU with begging bowl for admittance, whilst the vast majority of the UK, seems the want to be free of the 'United Sates of Europe shit', those crofts go cheap for a very good reason,...keep digging ....lol
Most cannabis growers are moving in the opposite direction ....Spain and Portugal ...where its legal, and the weather ain't bad either ....lol
It's all very well to get all excited about LEGAL cannabis
But 90% of the profits are due to criminal risk!

Half the people living in the Highlands and Islands are English anyway.
And 75% of Edinburgh aren't Scots.

Scotland wasn't forced to join the UK
They asked to join.

I get fed up with this BRAVEHEART version of history
IT'S BOLLOCKS!

Also THE PATRIOT another historic abortion by Mel Gibson.
Every Englishman wanted to kill Colonials....

In the 1770's and 80's half the population of London wore Blue and Beige fashions to show their support to the American Revolution.
Britain and the 13 Colonies were populated by brothers. cousins, fathers, sons, daughters, granddaughter.....
 

Onmyway

New Member
Sorry can I just interject on one point there:

scotland did not exactly ask to join the Uk, nor were the asked per say. However there were two acts of parliament from both member states, to create a union in the early 1800s.


It had a lot to do with the fact that both states had been sharing the same monarch for around a hundred years. This started because James vi ( king of scots) inherited the English throne from his second cousin twice removed (or some other similar distant family tie) Queen Elizabeth when she died in like 1603. Then in the early 1800s basically shit started gettin messy between the two sides again and the aristocrats of the day decided they better push for unification quick before it got worse.


When unification occured it was thought that as much as 3/4 of the scottish population were against union. However because Scotland was in very poor financial state, as to the effect of the Darien scheme (which is a whole other subject) the powers that be basically sold out to England. Many scottish officials and aristocrats received cash and other incentives like, titles and positions in parliament to go ahead with the unification. This was good for England because they basically bought Scotland for cheap and centralised government to Westminster.


There were other factors at play but that is a rough idea of what happened.
 
Top