A vote for Ron Paul is a vote for Obama..........Period.
Ron Paul didn't win the debate. He won the measured results on Twitter but that's meaningless since his people over-whelmed the voting. He stumbled a few times and did only ok. There is no disagreeing with what you say but the fact remains: A vote for Paul (if he runs as a independant), it only takes votes from the Republicans which in turn helps the Dems. The real question should be do you want Obama again for another 4 years or a Republican- ANY REPUBLICAN? A vote for Paul is a wasted vote, like Ralph Nadar and many others before him.
If we vote for him we will win, it's that simple.
no, he won't. ronald the millionaire will NEVER carry florida in a general.
kerry's states + florida = 271. game over.
If you like Obama, then vote for Obama. If you like Romney, then vote for Romney. Why would anybody wring their hands thinking, "oh my God, I must vote for the winner". Vote your fucking conscience, let the chips fall where they may.
i don't ever recall saying anything of the sort.
all i was pointing out is the impossibility of a paul presidency.
If he doesn't win the majority of people- the 99%, will lose and you and people like you will be to blame
i can live with that.
Plan on working in one of the camps?
It's going to take a lot of work to get the population down to 500,000,000 but hey I guess that means job security for you.
I guess the thing I don't get, is how he can really change any thing? He said he won't be an executive order kind of president, but the only other way would be congress and if you have been paying attention as I'm sure all here have, they won't agree on shit. So I guess that's what really bewilders me.
I guess the thing I don't get, is how he can really change any thing? He said he won't be an executive order kind of president, but the only other way would be congress and if you have been paying attention as I'm sure all here have, they won't agree on shit. So I guess that's what really bewilders me.
i don't ever recall saying anything of the sort.
all i was pointing out is the impossibility of a paul presidency.
The real question should be do you want Obama again for another 4 years or a Republican- ANY REPUBLICAN? A vote for Paul is a wasted vote, like Ralph Nadar and many others before him.
He'll reverse others executive orders. The president controls the troop movement so he can bring them home.I guess the thing I don't get, is how he can really change any thing? He said he won't be an executive order kind of president, but the only other way would be congress and if you have been paying attention as I'm sure all here have, they won't agree on shit. So I guess that's what really bewilders me.
He'll reverse others executive orders. The president controls the troop movement so he can bring them home.