Ron Paul....

suicidesamurai

suicidesamurai

Well-Known Member
twostarhotel said:
thats pretty awsome news! boo to everyone that says he cant win
Click to expand...
I highly doubt he could get the Republican nomination. GOP voters are largely retards (although not as retarded as Democrat voters). What bothers me is that he is an honest guy and says he won't run independent or for the Libertarians (and since he is honest, I believe he won't). I would love to see him run independent after he doesn't get the nomination. The money would still be rolling in and he could have a better chance. I would like to see him being what he is - separated from the establishment. Running as a Republican makes him a cog in the system, not as much separated from it.
 
VictorVIcious

VictorVIcious

Well-Known Member
What he said was he wouldn't run as an Indendant because he didn't have the millions of dollars it requires. AFter the 'record breaking' fund raiser this may change. He hasn't said he will. things are changing. VV
 
ViRedd

ViRedd

New Member
Alan Keyes was on Hannity last night ... and as usual, he was awesome.

An Alan Keyes, Ron Paul ticket as Independents would look mighty good to me.

Can't you just imagine these two guys teaming up for the final debates. Ha! Hillary, Obama, Edwards, or whom ever else gets the Democrat nomination would look like intellectual lightweights compared to these two. Same-o, same-o for the Republicans.

Vi
 
medicineman

medicineman

New Member
ViRedd said:
Alan Keyes was on Hannity last night ... and as usual, he was awesome.

An Alan Keyes, Ron Paul ticket as Independents would look mighty good to me.

Can't you just imagine these two guys teaming up for the final debates. Ha! Hillary, Obama, Edwards, or whom ever else gets the Democrat nomination would look like intellectual lightweights compared to these two. Same-o, same-o for the Republicans.

Vi
Click to expand...
I'm just wondering? So if a candidate agrees with your agenda then they are a heavyweight in the intellectual department, otherwise they are lightweight bozos, correct? Isn't that a rather egoistic view?
 
twostarhotel

twostarhotel

Well-Known Member
it shouldnt matter if he ran as a republican or dem or gay or hermi or whatever his name is ron paul and hes running for president fuck this labeling bullshit, evryone is so quick to judge without looking further then what ever "label" was given
not everyone is the same !! think before you act, observe everything not just whats appealing to you or everyone else
 
S

SylvanElf

Well-Known Member
twostarhotel said:
it shouldnt matter if he ran as a republican or dem or gay or hermi or whatever his name is ron paul and hes running for president fuck this labeling bullshit, evryone is so quick to judge without looking further then what ever "label" was given
not everyone is the same !! think before you act, observe everything not just whats appealing to you or everyone else
Click to expand...
Here here, I agree, give him a look and decide for yourself.
 
ViRedd

ViRedd

New Member
medicineman said:
I'm just wondering? So if a candidate agrees with your agenda then they are a heavyweight in the intellectual department, otherwise they are lightweight bozos, correct? Isn't that a rather egoistic view?
Click to expand...
Its not about me, nor is it about you. Its about liberty and freedom. How much of an intellectual does it take to stand before a national audience and declare that you will do everything possible, if elected, to uphold your oath to defend and uphold the Constitution, then in the very same breath, vow to push for unconstitutional government programs? That's exactly what EVERY Democrat candidate did in the last debate.

And, I would bet my next harvest that you have never read one of Ron Paul's books. And yet you come in here like a fuckin' bull in a china shop and try to tear down the posts of those who have read the man, and of those who know the difference.

Again, Med ... you are blowing a one-note horn.


​

Vi
 
MagusALL

MagusALL

Well-Known Member
for real. Ron Paul is a candidate, a man, like any of the others. He happens to be part of the Republican party, because well, to succeed in THIS country you need to pick one and there are really only two choices. Being with a party doesn't make him less of a man, nor less of a candidate. He has really great viewpoints and I think he would be the best president out of all the others. Therefore I will vote for HIM, no matter what party he chooses to run under. I think adding Keyes would make him a hands down victor. Big up yourself.
 
suicidesamurai

suicidesamurai

Well-Known Member
VictorVIcious said:
What he said was he wouldn't run as an Indendant because he didn't have the millions of dollars it requires. AFter the 'record breaking' fund raiser this may change. He hasn't said he will. things are changing. VV
Click to expand...
I've heard him say he won't do it without mentioning money. When asked during a debate if he would run independent he said he wouldn't because he is a Republican and only looking for the nomination. And he has been asked several other times and said no.
 
ViRedd

ViRedd

New Member
I think Ron Paul would like to help return the Republican Party back to its original intent; Small central government with power to the states.

Vi
 
MagusALL

MagusALL

Well-Known Member
you can go to tvokay.com and watch the whole thing. go to documentaries and every alex jones movie is on there. get ready to be amazed and vote for Dr. Ron Paul in 2008!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top