Haul me to Heaven
New Member
Climate Change Treaty A Precursor To Global Government?
By Dr. Chuck Baldwin
Posted by Justine
Writing for World Net Daily, Dr. Jerome Corsi states, "A former science
adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says the real purpose of
the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 is
to use global warming hype as a pretext to lay the foundation for a
one-world government."
Corsi quotes Lord Christopher Monckton as telling a Minnesota Free Market
Institute audience at Bethel University in St. Paul, "Your president will
sign it. Most of the Third World countries will sign it, because they think
they're going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regimes from the
European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won't sign it."
Corsi quotes Monckton as also saying, "I read that treaty and what it says
is this: that a world government is going to be created. The word
'government' actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new
entity."
See Corsi's column at:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=113219
To see a YouTube video segment of Lord Monckton's address go to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
Plus, here is a later Fox Business interview with Lord Monckton, in which he
further expands his thoughts:
http://tinyurl.com/foxbusiness-monckton
Did Lord Monckton exaggerate?
My research of the Climate Change document that Monckton references found
the following: it is a 181-page working document that does not mention the
words "ballot," "elected official," or "vote" anywhere in it. In my opinion,
Lord Monckton did not exaggerate; if anything, he may have understated the
situation. The document does indeed appear to be the institutional framework
for an unelected supreme communist-style world government.
By signing this document, the United States (and other industrial nations)
will forever take responsibility for the ills of backwards and third world
countries. And, according to Lord Monckton, this would include China and
India, along with the countries of Africa. Notice:
Page 6, "PP.15 Further acknowledging that developed countries have a
historical responsibility for their disproportionate contribution to the
causes and consequences of climate change, reflecting their disproportionate
historical use of a shared global carbon space since 1850 as well as their
proposed continuing disproportional use of the remaining global carbon space
. . . Warming of the climate system, as a consequence of human activity, is
unequivocal."
Page 38, "28. The adverse effects of climate change and response measures,
due to the historical cumulative GHG emissions of developed countries,
constitute an additional burden on all developing country Parties
(particularly low-lying and other small island countries, countries with
low-lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods,
drought and desertification, and developing countries with fragile
mountainous ecosystems) in reducing poverty, developing strategies to
address social vulnerabilities and attaining sustainable development and a
threat to achieving the United Nations Millennium Development Goals."
Page 122, "17. (a) Compensate for damage to the LDC's economy and also
compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity . . ."
"(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably
compensated for environmental, social and economic losses . . ."
By signing and being party to this document, we are accepting legal
financial responsibility to support non-developed countries FOREVER.
Page 27, "(b) Particularly vulnerable populations, groups and communities,
[or] All vulnerable groups whose adaptive capacity is low, [or] Groups
requiring special protection . . ."
Page 43, "41. (a) Assessed contributions of at least 0.7% of annual GDP of
developed country Parties." These funds will go directly to governments and
"community organizations."
Page 39, "33. [The financial burden] must be at least USD 67 billion (in the
range of USD 70-140 billion) per year."
The commitments of the developed countries are "economy wide." Page 58, "7.
(a) Mitigation commitments by all developed countries are legally binding
economy wide and absolute quantified emission reduction commitments."
"(b) Mitigation actions by developing countries are VOLUNTARY . . ."
(Emphasis added.)
The system appears to be loaded to ensure that the world body overseeing
this document is granted total control for the enforcement of the
requirements of this document throughout all developed countries. Penalties
for non-compliance by developed countries are scattered throughout the
document.
It appears that what a U.S. President and Congress (Republican or
Democratic) could not do through the constitutional legislative process,
they are attempting to do through international treaty. Therefore, it is my
studied opinion that Lord Monckton's assessment that this upcoming Climate
Change Convention in Copenhagen is a "pretext" for the establishment of one
world government is "spot-on."
It does seem to be getting clearer and clearer that if the elected civil
magistrates in Washington, D.C., do not quickly grow some backbone and
develop some sagacity as to the direction these globalists are taking our
country, resistance will be forced (in one way or another) upon the States
and the People, because it is not possible for the policies and financial
burden that are--and will be--levied upon the backs of the American people
to be sustained without the surrender of independence, the abridgment of
constitutional government, and the loss of liberty.
By Dr. Chuck Baldwin
Posted by Justine
Writing for World Net Daily, Dr. Jerome Corsi states, "A former science
adviser to British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher says the real purpose of
the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen on Dec. 7-18 is
to use global warming hype as a pretext to lay the foundation for a
one-world government."
Corsi quotes Lord Christopher Monckton as telling a Minnesota Free Market
Institute audience at Bethel University in St. Paul, "Your president will
sign it. Most of the Third World countries will sign it, because they think
they're going to get money out of it. Most of the left-wing regimes from the
European Union will rubber stamp it. Virtually nobody won't sign it."
Corsi quotes Monckton as also saying, "I read that treaty and what it says
is this: that a world government is going to be created. The word
'government' actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new
entity."
See Corsi's column at:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=113219
To see a YouTube video segment of Lord Monckton's address go to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMe5dOgbu40
Plus, here is a later Fox Business interview with Lord Monckton, in which he
further expands his thoughts:
http://tinyurl.com/foxbusiness-monckton
Did Lord Monckton exaggerate?
My research of the Climate Change document that Monckton references found
the following: it is a 181-page working document that does not mention the
words "ballot," "elected official," or "vote" anywhere in it. In my opinion,
Lord Monckton did not exaggerate; if anything, he may have understated the
situation. The document does indeed appear to be the institutional framework
for an unelected supreme communist-style world government.
By signing this document, the United States (and other industrial nations)
will forever take responsibility for the ills of backwards and third world
countries. And, according to Lord Monckton, this would include China and
India, along with the countries of Africa. Notice:
Page 6, "PP.15 Further acknowledging that developed countries have a
historical responsibility for their disproportionate contribution to the
causes and consequences of climate change, reflecting their disproportionate
historical use of a shared global carbon space since 1850 as well as their
proposed continuing disproportional use of the remaining global carbon space
. . . Warming of the climate system, as a consequence of human activity, is
unequivocal."
Page 38, "28. The adverse effects of climate change and response measures,
due to the historical cumulative GHG emissions of developed countries,
constitute an additional burden on all developing country Parties
(particularly low-lying and other small island countries, countries with
low-lying coastal, arid and semi-arid areas or areas liable to floods,
drought and desertification, and developing countries with fragile
mountainous ecosystems) in reducing poverty, developing strategies to
address social vulnerabilities and attaining sustainable development and a
threat to achieving the United Nations Millennium Development Goals."
Page 122, "17. (a) Compensate for damage to the LDC's economy and also
compensate for lost opportunities, resources, lives, land and dignity . . ."
"(b) Africa, in the context of environmental justice, should be equitably
compensated for environmental, social and economic losses . . ."
By signing and being party to this document, we are accepting legal
financial responsibility to support non-developed countries FOREVER.
Page 27, "(b) Particularly vulnerable populations, groups and communities,
[or] All vulnerable groups whose adaptive capacity is low, [or] Groups
requiring special protection . . ."
Page 43, "41. (a) Assessed contributions of at least 0.7% of annual GDP of
developed country Parties." These funds will go directly to governments and
"community organizations."
Page 39, "33. [The financial burden] must be at least USD 67 billion (in the
range of USD 70-140 billion) per year."
The commitments of the developed countries are "economy wide." Page 58, "7.
(a) Mitigation commitments by all developed countries are legally binding
economy wide and absolute quantified emission reduction commitments."
"(b) Mitigation actions by developing countries are VOLUNTARY . . ."
(Emphasis added.)
The system appears to be loaded to ensure that the world body overseeing
this document is granted total control for the enforcement of the
requirements of this document throughout all developed countries. Penalties
for non-compliance by developed countries are scattered throughout the
document.
It appears that what a U.S. President and Congress (Republican or
Democratic) could not do through the constitutional legislative process,
they are attempting to do through international treaty. Therefore, it is my
studied opinion that Lord Monckton's assessment that this upcoming Climate
Change Convention in Copenhagen is a "pretext" for the establishment of one
world government is "spot-on."
It does seem to be getting clearer and clearer that if the elected civil
magistrates in Washington, D.C., do not quickly grow some backbone and
develop some sagacity as to the direction these globalists are taking our
country, resistance will be forced (in one way or another) upon the States
and the People, because it is not possible for the policies and financial
burden that are--and will be--levied upon the backs of the American people
to be sustained without the surrender of independence, the abridgment of
constitutional government, and the loss of liberty.
