If you make arguments that hold two positions at once, which one should I consider?
On one hand based on some of your posts, you seem to want to be known as a person who supports peace, then on the other hand you embrace systemic coercion based compulsory things via government. The two concepts are opposing.
When you hold two opposing points of view, your argument is within yourself.
Is that y'all's new way of saying racist? Now if you can't call them racist because you clearly have no understanding of the meaning you call them pedo's?