soil And hydro

BSIv2.0

Well-Known Member

• Jan 24, 2008

• #1

Just wondering how many people grow using both methods.....and thoughts. Continuous growing I guess...not "I once tried...."

Who continues to use both methods and why?

 

budforever442200

Well-Known Member

• Jan 24, 2008

• #2

Both......Sounds expensive.

 

BSIv2.0

Well-Known Member

• Jan 24, 2008

• #3

budforever442200 said:

Both......Sounds expensive.

Click to expand...

Not any more expensive than doing just soil.....the hydro "cost" is in the setup. That can be alleviated by making a DIY hydro system. Ive built rubbermaide dwc's for under $40. And bought bucket setups for about the same....roughly

The soil buying is the expensive part....and attention getting if you have nosey neighbors.

 

budforever442200

Well-Known Member

• Jan 24, 2008

• #4

The only reason id want both is a small hydro 4 me and soil for the clubs.

 

BSIv2.0

Well-Known Member

• Jan 24, 2008

• #5

Anyone else......who actually uses both?

 

abudsmoker

Well-Known Member

• Jan 24, 2008

• #6

i do sir, both is not the best idea. but i do it...

alot of hydro guys and girls have the mommy's in the mud.

 

BSIv2.0

Well-Known Member

• Jan 24, 2008

• #7

abudsmoker said:

i do sir, both is not the best idea. but i do it...

alot of hydro guys and girls have the mommy's in the mud.

Click to expand...

Agreed...hydro moms actually grow too fast. Alot of wasted cuttings. And makes you have to raise the lights to accomodate them....From my experience.

But budding ladies in water is a great thing....as you know.