Man o' the green
Active Member
First, I have to say that getting "Da Buddha" from 7th Floor was one of those moments that changes your perspective. Like when I got Tivo, I didn't really understand the implications until using it for a while.
Vaporizers sound like a good idea when researching them, there are testimonials of all kinds extolling the virtues of vapor vs. smoke. Unfortunately, they seem too good to be true.. This is what prevented me from getting one for the longest time, as well as the cost, of course. ( have you priced a volcano ? )
A few months back, I found "Da Buddha" online, as an alternative to the SSV. ( Silver Surfer , 7th Floor ) It was a reasonable price ( under $200 ), so I bought one direct from their website. Let me just say that in many contacts, dealing with this company has been very easy.
The vaporizer comes with everything you need to get started, but being very old-school, I had never purchased a grinder. It is necessary to have one, I've found out, so got a good, big one.
Using this passive device is easy, just suck your material into the wand and insert it in the heater. Inhale, and that's it. Now, one major difference between the passive and bag design is that the bag mixes all of your vapor together. What this means is that you get all the same mixture of cannabinoids, every time. With the passive design, you get the lower boiling materials first, such as the aromatics (120+ C), then the THC (149.3 C) , and finally CBD (206.3 C) and CBN (212.7 C). This vapor profile , or fractionation can have some interesting results depending on how you use your device.
The three variables you have to balance : amount of material, temperature of the heater, and draw speed ( sucking ). Along with the tendency of the material to boil off more and more vapor and become hotter, you may need to adjust your use slightly.
Another interesting result is the true flavor profile you get. Much more intense than smoking. This flavor, of course, changes from strain to strain, but I've found that cheap material is best burned. The taste in the vaporizer is bad, and ruins the experience.
I've had my device long enough to purchase accessories for it, and custom glassware. This is only for show, really, but the pieces are very well made. Now one of the best accessories is the "ice chamber" that will filter your vapor through ice water. ( Looks like a bong ). Cool moist air is much preferred on your throat.
Be aware, if you thought you coughed only from smoke, think again. Vapor will make you cough if concentrated enough so be prepared... Don't blow into the tube by accident, it can blow the material on to the heating element and burn. If you do have a flame-out in your wand, replace the screen.
One more interesting note; as one day i was out of material I was looking for a way to get some more.. My plants were halfway through flowering and not ready. I had the idea to pick off a small flower and place it in my wand. Still wet, just off the plant, it takes some time to heat up, but when it does, it provides very fresh vapor. So to sum up, you can vape wet flowers in a pinch, and get almost equal results. I hope someone else can repeat this finding.
The Man
Vaporizers sound like a good idea when researching them, there are testimonials of all kinds extolling the virtues of vapor vs. smoke. Unfortunately, they seem too good to be true.. This is what prevented me from getting one for the longest time, as well as the cost, of course. ( have you priced a volcano ? )
A few months back, I found "Da Buddha" online, as an alternative to the SSV. ( Silver Surfer , 7th Floor ) It was a reasonable price ( under $200 ), so I bought one direct from their website. Let me just say that in many contacts, dealing with this company has been very easy.
The vaporizer comes with everything you need to get started, but being very old-school, I had never purchased a grinder. It is necessary to have one, I've found out, so got a good, big one.
Using this passive device is easy, just suck your material into the wand and insert it in the heater. Inhale, and that's it. Now, one major difference between the passive and bag design is that the bag mixes all of your vapor together. What this means is that you get all the same mixture of cannabinoids, every time. With the passive design, you get the lower boiling materials first, such as the aromatics (120+ C), then the THC (149.3 C) , and finally CBD (206.3 C) and CBN (212.7 C). This vapor profile , or fractionation can have some interesting results depending on how you use your device.
The three variables you have to balance : amount of material, temperature of the heater, and draw speed ( sucking ). Along with the tendency of the material to boil off more and more vapor and become hotter, you may need to adjust your use slightly.
Another interesting result is the true flavor profile you get. Much more intense than smoking. This flavor, of course, changes from strain to strain, but I've found that cheap material is best burned. The taste in the vaporizer is bad, and ruins the experience.
I've had my device long enough to purchase accessories for it, and custom glassware. This is only for show, really, but the pieces are very well made. Now one of the best accessories is the "ice chamber" that will filter your vapor through ice water. ( Looks like a bong ). Cool moist air is much preferred on your throat.
Be aware, if you thought you coughed only from smoke, think again. Vapor will make you cough if concentrated enough so be prepared... Don't blow into the tube by accident, it can blow the material on to the heating element and burn. If you do have a flame-out in your wand, replace the screen.
One more interesting note; as one day i was out of material I was looking for a way to get some more.. My plants were halfway through flowering and not ready. I had the idea to pick off a small flower and place it in my wand. Still wet, just off the plant, it takes some time to heat up, but when it does, it provides very fresh vapor. So to sum up, you can vape wet flowers in a pinch, and get almost equal results. I hope someone else can repeat this finding.
The Man