Speeding SUV drives through a Christmas parade in a Milwaukee suburb.

Riddick65

Riddick65

Member
.Smoke said:
I'll fix this for you,

"According to the constitution, Rittenhouse was a victim who successfully defended himself from 3 assailants."

Anyone of you would have wanted to defended yourself in the same situation, and not given a fuck about the people trying to kill you.
Click to expand...
I don't need anyone like you saying a damn thing for me. I wouldn't have gone where that fool went, and i wouldn't have done what that fool did.
He went looking for trouble, after saying in a video that he wished he could kill some protesters, and he found trouble. But evil protects evil, and he was aquitted even though he was obviously guilty. P.S. the constitution doesn't guarantee the right to murder people with your new rifle, while you're playing G.I. Joe with your boogie boi buddies.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
.Smoke said:
I'll fix this for you,

"According to the constitution, Rittenhouse was a victim who successfully defended himself from 3 assailants."

Anyone of you would have wanted to defended yourself in the same situation, and not given a fuck about the people trying to kill you.
Click to expand...
lmao. Set down or shit even not bring the gun and there wouldn't have been any need to use it.

The little dickhead pointed his gun at some crazy fucker and panicked when that didn't scare them into submission, and then killed them and said 'self defense'.

But once again this thread is all about keeping this stupid as shit killer's name at the top of the forum, because right wing trolls are trying to divide our nation using fucked events like this as their ammo. So it doesn't really matter.
 
potroastV2

potroastV2

Well-Known Member
nuskool89 said:
So @hanimmal, do you recall others posting about Rittenhouses social media posts prior to the shooting? Do you remember him instantly being tied to white supremacy/right winger/etc etc by mainstream media and many posters here? Wasn’t it dictated exactly what was in his heart, and his evil assumed by his actions? The blanket statements about white this and white that because the white man is inherently the root of all issues in the world?

Is it unusual 17 hours later, it’s already being dismissed as a byproduct of this individual fleeing the scene where he stabbed someone? I didn’t see any officers pursuing him besides the one on foot valiantly chasing after the vehicle through the crowd. Or while “fleeing” is it strange he fired into the crowd while running people over?

Does his affiliation with BLM or anti police rhetoric mean anyone affiliated are evil like him?

Shouldn’t we assume the worst of him and attribute that to an entire group of people?

Was his car more deadly than Kyle’s AR?

Shouldn’t we assume anyone who shares similar thoughts he did about Rittenhouse or police are just as crazy and evil and inherently bad/the problem with this country?


Or instead do you agree with my mindset in that this was an individual, capable of individual thoughts and reason, influenced by outside forces? His perception of right and wrong his own and he does not speak for “the left” or “black people” and we should simply acknowledge evil comes in all forms?

Is he an anarchist? A communist? A (fill in the blank?) Or is he just Darrel Brooks Jr? A loser who is responsible for his own actions?

heavy.com

Darrell Brooks Jr.: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Police squads were at an address used by Darrell Brooks Jr. and law enforcement sources confirmed he was being questioned in connection with the Waukesha parade incident.
heavy.com
Click to expand...

This reminds me of a teenager who is trying to sound like an adult. :lol:


:mrgreen:
 
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
BurtMaklin said:
No, I'm not. The victims here were there for a family outing, they weren't active participants in a violent riot and trying to assault a minor with a gun. If you want to play stupid games to win stupid prizes, don't go squealing like a little bitch when someone caps your pedo ass.
Click to expand...
They could all be child rapists, at this point we don’t know but let’s not stop speculating, facts just fuck up the story
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
CunningCanuk said:
I don’t know what happened to him. He used to be sensible.
Click to expand...
He went off the rails after Bernie lost the primary. Or maybe his mask fell off. I don't know which. The thing is, he's Canadian (or says he is). Why would a Canadian care so deeply that they would degenerate into a Bernie bro?

Anyway, I have the dickhead on ignore. Because in his walls of text he says nothing.
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
CatHedral said:
I do want to know how previously unknown unsavories about the victim(s) make a difference. Perpetrator was unaware.
Click to expand...
Because it makes it feel better to troll them at the family diner, because as soon as someone says that it is stupid thing to say, the asshole gets to claim that they are 'defending a pedophile' and pretend like they have a point when people stop talking, because nobody is going to do that.

It is the troll talking point that gives them total satisfaction.


Screen Shot 2021-11-23 at 4.59.46 PM.png
 
CatHedral

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
Because it makes it feel better to troll them at the family diner, because as soon as someone says that it is stupid thing to say, the asshole gets to claim that they are 'defending a pedophile' and pretend like they have a point when people stop talking, because nobody is going to do that.

It is the troll talking point that gives them total satisfaction.


View attachment 5033967
Click to expand...
Yeah
 
zeddd

zeddd

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
Because it makes it feel better to troll them at the family diner, because as soon as someone says that it is stupid thing to say, the asshole gets to claim that they are 'defending a pedophile' and pretend like they have a point when people stop talking, because nobody is going to do that.

It is the troll talking point that gives them total satisfaction.


View attachment 5033967
Click to expand...
I agree, It’s the old post hoc ergo proper hoc logical fallacy, they will often add “it was gods will. Poor them life must be a struggle
 
BurtMaklin

BurtMaklin

Well-Known Member
CatHedral said:
I do want to know how previously unknown unsavories about the victim(s) make a difference. Perpetrator was unaware.
Click to expand...
Oh my Gawd, I'm painfully aware of that fact. With both cases, although they differ greatly. How the pedo died makes no difference to me, as long as it's dead. Good riddance to bad trash.

The pedo had a chance to walk away, but chose not to. He chose to escalate the situation with an armed, scared, stupid child and tried to assault him. You can't make this shit up, the pedo just can't keep his hands off children. Not only was it an incredibly bad choice, if it had not made it, in all likelihood everyone involved would probably still be alive.

Does it make it right that a child is allowed to patrol the streets like a cop, and armed/dressed like a soldier? Probably not the best legal precedent to set, but 'Murika. Because the prosecution laid the wrong charges and fumbled the case , that's gonna be hard to change now. Maybe next time they try a case that has so much political importance, maybe put forth the best legal minds in the state to make sure precedent like this doesn't slip through their fingers.

Now, this case.

A bunch of people either participating in a holiday children's parade or out with their families at a holiday children's parade. Are we really going to pretend that a riot with armed assholes patrolling around "stopping"people from looting and setting fires at 1am is the same scenario as a children's parade? Did one of the dancing grannies try to take the piece of shit's keys away and he ran her over? These people are completely innocent victims of a piece of shit criminal who randomly decided they were to die that day, not victims of their own poor choices (both being at a riot where there were armed retards playing cop, and choosing to engage with one).

If one of the victims happens to be a pedo, then yes, that thing got what it deserved. Maybe the circumstances surrounding their demise weren't quite right in a legal or right vs wrong kinda way, but it's a karmic win in my book. The only good pedo is a dead pedo.

I don't know if this cleared it up for you.
 
CatHedral

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
BurtMaklin said:
Oh my Gawd, I'm painfully aware of that fact. With both cases, although they differ greatly. How the pedo died makes no difference to me, as long as it's dead. Good riddance to bad trash.

The pedo had a chance to walk away, but chose not to. He chose to escalate the situation with an armed, scared, stupid child and tried to assault him. You can't make this shit up, the pedo just can't keep his hands off children. Not only was it an incredibly bad choice, if it had not made it, in all likelihood everyone involved would probably still be alive.

Does it make it right that a child is allowed to patrol the streets like a cop, and armed/dressed like a soldier? Probably not the best legal precedent to set, but 'Murika. Because the prosecution laid the wrong charges and fumbled the case , that's gonna be hard to change now. Maybe next time they try a case that has so much political importance, maybe put forth the best legal minds in the state to make sure precedent like this doesn't slip through their fingers.

Now, this case.

A bunch of people either participating in a holiday children's parade or out with their families at a holiday children's parade. Are we really going to pretend that a riot with armed assholes patrolling around "stopping"people from looting and setting fires at 1am is the same scenario as a children's parade? Did one of the dancing grannies try to take the piece of shit's keys away and he ran her over? These people are completely innocent victims of a piece of shit criminal who randomly decided they were to die that day, not victims of their own poor choices (both being at a riot where there were armed retards playing cop, and choosing to engage with one).

If one of the victims happens to be a pedo, then yes, that thing got what it deserved. Maybe the circumstances surrounding their demise weren't quite right in a legal or right vs wrong kinda way, but it's a karmic win in my book. The only good pedo is a dead pedo.

I don't know if this cleared it up for you.
Click to expand...
That was a giant sidestep.
 
L

Livingblacksoil

Well-Known Member
nuskool89 said:
So @hanimmal, do you recall others posting about Rittenhouses social media posts prior to the shooting? Do you remember him instantly being tied to white supremacy/right winger/etc etc by mainstream media and many posters here? Wasn’t it dictated exactly what was in his heart, and his evil assumed by his actions? The blanket statements about white this and white that because the white man is inherently the root of all issues in the world?

Is it unusual 17 hours later, it’s already being dismissed as a byproduct of this individual fleeing the scene where he stabbed someone? I didn’t see any officers pursuing him besides the one on foot valiantly chasing after the vehicle through the crowd. Or while “fleeing” is it strange he fired into the crowd while running people over?

Does his affiliation with BLM or anti police rhetoric mean anyone affiliated are evil like him?

Shouldn’t we assume the worst of him and attribute that to an entire group of people?

Was his car more deadly than Kyle’s AR?

Shouldn’t we assume anyone who shares similar thoughts he did about Rittenhouse or police are just as crazy and evil and inherently bad/the problem with this country?


Or instead do you agree with my mindset in that this was an individual, capable of individual thoughts and reason, influenced by outside forces? His perception of right and wrong his own and he does not speak for “the left” or “black people” and we should simply acknowledge evil comes in all forms?

Is he an anarchist? A communist? A (fill in the blank?) Or is he just Darrel Brooks Jr? A loser who is responsible for his own actions?

heavy.com

Darrell Brooks Jr.: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Police squads were at an address used by Darrell Brooks Jr. and law enforcement sources confirmed he was being questioned in connection with the Waukesha parade incident.
heavy.com
Click to expand...
Very edgy. 2 notes:
You should capitalize Black as you would Jewish, European or American.
Please explain why it's in quotation marks.
 
Dr.Amber Trichome

Dr.Amber Trichome

Well-Known Member
It’s so sad . The grandmas spent their entire lives caring for people and it ends like this.? It kinda reminds me of the Boston marathon killings because it was an outdoor gathering in the streets as well . Life is gettting more and more difficult to enjoy when it’s concerning to do any kind of gatherings like these anymore. rip
9C66578E-AEFA-4343-984D-5C9F9B9A77FF.jpeg
 
hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-2655785988/?cx_testId=6&cx_testVariant=cx_undefined&cx_artPos=4#cxrecs_sScreen Shot 2021-11-24 at 7.51.12 AM.png
In an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity on Tuesday night, former president Donald Trump commented on the Waukesha Christmas Parade tragedy, which left six people dead.

Referring to suspect Darrell Brooks, who is being held on $5 million bond after appearing in court Tuesday, Trump said, "The good news is he hated Trump."

Trump was apparently referring to reports that Brooks, an aspiring rapper, once posted an anti-Trump song with explicit lyrics on Soundcloud.

"This that f*ck Donald Trump flow and whoever hate it," Brooks rapped in the song uploaded three years ago.

Brooks also reportedly posted a video on one of his Twitter accounts ranting about a speech made by then-President Barack Obama, which he called "a crock of bullsh*t."

Watch below.

Trump on Waukesha: The good news is he hated Trump pic.twitter.com/hE800i5Gvb
— Acyn (@Acyn) November 24, 2021
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top