Summary

SneekyNinja said:
Dude I don't need any benefits but I want them for other people regardless.

The dickhead who claims vets benefits but never actually did anything dangerous wants to deny benefits to other people.

If you can't see how you're being a complete cucktard on the wrong side of the argument then I honestly give up on you.
Click to expand...
Then try to separate the issues. You've been taking conflation lessons from Buckwit and it shows.
 
ttystikk said:
You aren't a real vet. The jury is out on whether you're a real anything.

Your moralistic stance on whether someone's service is 'good enough' for them to qualify for benefits is exactly the kind of shit right wingers would say, coached by their one percenter leadership caste... as a pretext to cut them off.

You're really one pathetic little dangleberry, Stinkydigit.
Click to expand...

dangleberry:lol: cofveve/screen
 
ttystikk said:
Oh I see it all right; you're shitting on a vet because he wasn't good enough for you.

But he signed up and did the job. You didn't, you miserable fucking coward.

You're pathetic, Stinkydigit.
Click to expand...
Pigheaded post.

He signed up to a low pay, long hour job and the benefit was part of the contract. Not denying that. It's worth pointing out that when convenient, Republicans are all for breaking those contracts in other industries and "Tump2020" voted for Republicans.

He's speaking out of both ends when he votes to deny benefits to others but proclaims that denying vets is political suicide.

When the shithead calls himself a "veteran" hes making an emotional appeal filled with images of battlefield glory. Surely you don't deny he's a paper tiger and using the word as if he'd seen combat?

I don't know why you are defending him. He's a fucking Republican.

Oh, right. You hate Democrats, not Republicans. Carry on then defend the paper tiger veteran who callously votes against benefits for others when his are safe.
 
Last edited:
Fogdog said:
Pigheaded post.

He signed up to a low pay, long hour job and the benefit was part of the contract. Not denying that. It's worth pointing out that when convenient, Republicans are all for breaking those contracts in other industries and "Tump2020" voted for Republicans.

He's speaking out of both ends when he votes to deny benefits to others but proclaims that denying vets is political suicide.

When the shithead calls himself a "veteran" hes making an emotional appeal filled with images of battlefield glory. Surely you don't deny he's a paper tiger and using the word as if he'd seen combat?

I don't know why you are defending him. He's a fucking Republican.

Oh, right. You hate Democrats, not Republicans. Carry on then defend the paper tiger veteran who callously votes against benefits for others when his are safe.
Click to expand...
You've got me all wrong- not a surprise, since you have been working hard to put me in a box of your own description for months now, if not years.

His status as a veteran isn't the problem. Not are the benefits he's entitled to as a veteran, no matter what he did it didn't do while in uniform. If he got anything better than a dishonorable discharge, he gets all the benefits he is entitled to. The notion that he shouldn't is a far more right wing position than anything I've ever advanced- but we all know you are very directionally challenged when it comes to political leanings.

His desire to deny others benefits that he's entitled to IS the problem. I happen to agree this is a disingenuous stance and you're right to question it.

Conflation will get you nowhere in this argument.

Attempting to discredit me by misrepresenting my political positions won't, either.
 
Unclebaldrick said:
If I got a bunch of sincere "likes" from gonnagro, I would seriously consider who or what I have become.
Click to expand...
So how's entrenched division been working out in our country so far? You like who's running the place, or what they're doing?

Maybe it's time to change strategy and find common ground with other fellow citizens. Even if you don't agree with them on EVERYTHING, perhaps you can agree on SOMETHING. Consensus building- it's a real thing and it actually works a lot better than the extreme partisanship exhibited here and across American politics.

Think about it.
 
Last edited:
ttystikk said:
You've got me all wrong- not a surprise, since you have been working hard to put me in a box of your own description for months now, if not years.

His status as a veteran isn't the problem. Not are the benefits he's entitled to as a veteran, no matter what he did it didn't do while in uniform. If he got anything better than a dishonorable discharge, he gets all the benefits he is entitled to. The notion that he shouldn't is a far more right wing position than anything I've ever advanced- but we all know you are very directionally challenged when it comes to political leanings.

His desire to deny others benefits that he's entitled to IS the problem. I happen to agree this is a disingenuous stance and you're right to question it.

Conflation will get you nowhere in this argument.

Attempting to discredit me by misrepresenting my political positions won't, either.
Click to expand...
You discredited yourself. I only held up the mirror. It's a pity that you look so bad.
 
ttystikk said:
You've been taking conflation lessons from Buckwit
Click to expand...

2TUpn-1471011467-3702-list_items-jan-marcia.gif
 
Grandpapy said:
We use to worry about the benefits that our grandchildren would have. When we had the time.

The Senate has given a green light to opening Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.

We should reward Communism and sell it to them below maker value. And reward the Oil Companies too!

:wall:
Click to expand...
Oh, but we already are...

http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/26/news/companies/china-texas-oilfields/index.html

The byline is from 2015. It's not even a new thing anymore.
 
dagwood45431 said:
I know and none of your fucking business. Accept it or don't. Why is a bernturd jumping to the defense of a trumptard anyway? Oh yeah. Now I remember.
Click to expand...
Love the nasty labels- and you want to accuse someone else of being a Chump supporter?

If you can't show some credible evidence to back your claims then I have every right to say you're full of shit.

When someone is right, I give them credit. I don't care who they are or what else they might say that's wrong or worse. That's the essence of building a consensus- which apparently you don't have the first clue about doing.

Finding and deepening divisions is exactly how we got the clown car full in the current administration. So how's it working out?

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say, 'not so hot.' Therefore, maybe it's time for a different approach.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top