Thanks RIU! we filed yesterday...

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
We filed yesterday...Now we have 15 days before we get back a title and summary, then we publish and gather signatures.
In part, the birth of this effort was inspired by the folks here at RIU, and of course ya'll were the first witnesses to see or know of the proposed measure, so thanks :)
Below is the final wording that was filed.




The People of the County of Lake, in the State of California, do hereby decree:


'The Freedom to Garden Human Rights Restoration Act of 2014'


An Ordinance to restore the natural Human Right to grow and use plants for the basic necessities of life.

Whereas in the State of California, the People of the County of Lake do hereby Find, Declare and Ordain as follows:
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for people to reaffirm and reestablish the fundamental human rights with which they are naturally endowed, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's origins entitle them, and to recognize a decent respect for the opinions of humankind, requires that they should declare the causes which compel them to come forward toward the reestablishment of those rights.
We hold these truths to be self-evident:
That all humans beings are created equal. That human beings are naturally endowed with certain rights, and that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and that to secure these rights, governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, and that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to re-declare and reestablish the inherent human rights that would intrinsically correct such governmental negligence, and to reconstitute such in a form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
Therefore, in accordance with the 9th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America,
Amendment IX:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.",
and also in accordance with the California State Constitution, Article 1 Declaration of Rights, Section 21.: ..."This declaration of rights may not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people.",
and, also as consistent with County of Lake Ordinance No. 2267 in relation to private property rights, and,
whereas disregard and contempt for certain human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of humankind, and, whereas in a world which human beings endeavor to enjoy freedom of speech and belief, and where freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of peoples everywhere, be it here proclaimed that it has become necessary to reaffirm and specifically re-constitute the self evident inherent freedom to grow and use plants as described herein:

Section 1., Findings:

That human beings are naturally endowed with the fundamental self evident right to have and grow the natural plants of this earth, and the naturally occurring seeds thereof, to be used for their own needs as individuals in pursuit of life and in effort to live, and that such basic human rights have been recognized and acknowledged to exist, and that these rights are held in perpetuity outside of the constitutional responsibility of a government to protect an individual's right to engage in commerce.

Section 1.(a)

That all County of Lake residents residing within the unincorporated areas of the County who exercise the rights described in Section 1. of this Act at their residence within said area, and are compliant with Section 2.(a), and are gardening outside (outdoors) or in a greenhouse (and not withstanding any generally applicable urgency ordinance(s) specifically relating to water conservation), are, as accorded in the paragraphs above, necessarily exempt from any County permitting or other County ordinances that would limit an individual's home gardening efforts or abilities in conjunction with Section 1.

Section 1.(b)

That any law, to the extent that it would specifically deny or disparage the human rights as described in Section 1. of this Act is unconstitutional by both the Federal Constitutions 9th Amendment, and also by the State Constitutions Article 1 Declaration of Rights, Section 21, and by the fact that such self evident human rights are held in perpetuity by the People.

Section 2., Responsibilities:

Should neighbor complaints that are not related to Section 2.(a) herein, or that are not related to a specific medically verifiable toxic health risk to the public arise as an official complaint to the County as a result of an individual(s) exercising the rights as described in Section 1., and Section 1.(a), (and not withstanding any effected party choosing to seek remedy and or reparations by way of litigation through civil proceedings), all the effected parties shall be directed to mediation provided for by the County of Lake, and if resolution between the effected parties cannot be achieved in a reasonable effort to mediate (to be determined by the appointed mediator), the effected parties shall then continue mediation at their own expense (to be equally divided between the effected parties) until a resolution between the parties can be agreed upon, or until one of the effected parties withdraws from the mediation.

Section 2.(a)

All who exercise the rights described in Section 1., and Section 1.(a) of this Act, shall take reasonable care to prevent environmental destruction, and are responsible to mitigate any possible foreseen negative impacts on the natural environments, and all persons who neglect such practices shall be subject to the authority designated under Section 2.(b) herein, but such remedies are to be used to help individuals come into compliance with this section and not to unreasonably burden individuals who exercise the rights described in Section 1.

Section 2.(b)

The County of Lake Environmental Health Department shall administer over individual circumstances that may arise related to Section 2. and Section 2.(a) herein, but all such administrative authority and compliance inquiries shall be restricted to circumstances where a verifiable neighbor (or resident of the county) complaint in writing and signed by the complainant has been officially registered with the county.

Section 3., Special Circumstances:

Any law, to the extent that it would specifically deny or disparage the Human Rights as described in Section 1. of this Act, (and not withstanding an individual in violation of using illegal gardening chemicals, including but not limited to, certain pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and fertilizers), is to be set aside unless it can be determined that the individual circumstance is occurring within the context of "commerce" related activities as defined herein, or if an individual's violation(s) of Section 2.(a) of this Act are to the extent of violating a criminal statute.

Section 3.(a)

This Act shall not apply in circumstances where (a) private rental or lease agreement(s) (contract) exist(s) pertaining to the occupancy and or use of any private land unless such is otherwise specifically enumerated within said agreement(s) (contract), or unless the agreement(s) (contract) does not specify any conditions or agreement pertaining to outside (or greenhouse) home gardening.

Section 4., Definitions:

(a) For the express purposes of this Act, the word "commerce" shall be taken to mean:
The buying and selling of goods or services in any form, and in direct reference to the exchange of United States currency (or other such legally recognized tender) for such goods or services.

(b) For the express purposes of this Act, the words phrased as "compliance inquiries" shall be taken to mean:

A written and delivered inquiry, and an in person inquiry as to responding to (a) specific complaint(s), and to which access to inspect private property shall only be in circumstances where the respondent has voluntarily agreed to and granted such access, or where on an individual basis, a court order has provided for such access.

(c) For the express purposes of Section 1. of this Act, the words phrased as "to be used for their own needs" shall be taken to mean:
For use as food, medicine, fiber, fuel, building materials, environmental damage mitigation or other environmental concerns, privacy, aesthetics or ambiance, spiritual/religious requirement, (or other) basic necessities of life.

(d) For the express purposes of Section 1. of this Act, the word "natural" and the words phrased as "naturally occurring" shall be taken to mean:
Plant species and varieties of such that have evolved in nature through the traditional pollination and cross pollination processes, be that by wind/weather, or animal (including human) assistance.

(e) For the express purposes of Section 1.(a) and Section 3.(a) of this Act, the word "greenhouse" shall be taken to mean:
Any structure where the sun's light can penetrate at least 80% of the roof (ceiling or top) surface and that is intended for and used for growing plants in.

Section 5., Severability:

If any provision of this Act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Act which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Act are severable. The People of the County of Lake hereby declare that we would have adopted this Act irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.
 

Doer

Well-Known Member
It is a Lake County Ordinance proposal. seems to me....and quite a hoot, I must say.
 

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
Is this a proposed amendment to the CA constitution? Is it a local ballot initiative?

It is a Lake County Ordinance proposal. seems to me....and quite a hoot, I must say.

Dear Doer hoots correctly (this time ;)), it is strictly a Lake county proposal and we expect much litigation...it would be a good thing if we could eventually put it on the State ballot where it belongs...of course it would also be nice and proper if it were a world standard. (lol)
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
We filed yesterday...Now we have 15 days before we get back a title and summary, then we publish and gather signatures.
In part, the birth of this effort was inspired by the folks here at RIU, and of course ya'll were the first witnesses to see or know of the proposed measure, so thanks :)
Below is the final wording that was filed.




The People of the County of Lake, in the State of California, do hereby decree:


'The Freedom to Garden Human Rights Restoration Act of 2014'


An Ordinance to restore the natural Human Right to grow and use plants for the basic necessities of life.

Whereas in the State of California, the People of the County of Lake do hereby Find, Declare and Ordain as follows:
When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for people to reaffirm and reestablish the fundamental human rights with which they are naturally endowed, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's origins entitle them, and to recognize a decent respect for the opinions of humankind, requires that they should declare the causes which compel them to come forward toward the reestablishment of those rights.
We hold these truths to be self-evident:
That all humans beings are created equal. That human beings are naturally endowed with certain rights, and that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and that to secure these rights, governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, and that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to re-declare and reestablish the inherent human rights that would intrinsically correct such governmental negligence, and to reconstitute such in a form as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
Therefore, in accordance with the 9th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America,
Amendment IX:
"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.",
and also in accordance with the California State Constitution, Article 1 Declaration of Rights, Section 21.: ..."This declaration of rights may not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people.",
and, also as consistent with County of Lake Ordinance No. 2267 in relation to private property rights, and,
whereas disregard and contempt for certain human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of humankind, and, whereas in a world which human beings endeavor to enjoy freedom of speech and belief, and where freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of peoples everywhere, be it here proclaimed that it has become necessary to reaffirm and specifically re-constitute the self evident inherent freedom to grow and use plants as described herein:

Section 1., Findings:

That human beings are naturally endowed with the fundamental self evident right to have and grow the natural plants of this earth, and the naturally occurring seeds thereof, to be used for their own needs as individuals in pursuit of life and in effort to live, and that such basic human rights have been recognized and acknowledged to exist, and that these rights are held in perpetuity outside of the constitutional responsibility of a government to protect an individual's right to engage in commerce.

Section 1.(a)

That all County of Lake residents residing within the unincorporated areas of the County who exercise the rights described in Section 1. of this Act at their residence within said area, and are compliant with Section 2.(a), and are gardening outside (outdoors) or in a greenhouse (and not withstanding any generally applicable urgency ordinance(s) specifically relating to water conservation), are, as accorded in the paragraphs above, necessarily exempt from any County permitting or other County ordinances that would limit an individual's home gardening efforts or abilities in conjunction with Section 1.

Section 1.(b)

That any law, to the extent that it would specifically deny or disparage the human rights as described in Section 1. of this Act is unconstitutional by both the Federal Constitutions 9th Amendment, and also by the State Constitutions Article 1 Declaration of Rights, Section 21, and by the fact that such self evident human rights are held in perpetuity by the People.

Section 2., Responsibilities:

Should neighbor complaints that are not related to Section 2.(a) herein, or that are not related to a specific medically verifiable toxic health risk to the public arise as an official complaint to the County as a result of an individual(s) exercising the rights as described in Section 1., and Section 1.(a), (and not withstanding any effected party choosing to seek remedy and or reparations by way of litigation through civil proceedings), all the effected parties shall be directed to mediation provided for by the County of Lake, and if resolution between the effected parties cannot be achieved in a reasonable effort to mediate (to be determined by the appointed mediator), the effected parties shall then continue mediation at their own expense (to be equally divided between the effected parties) until a resolution between the parties can be agreed upon, or until one of the effected parties withdraws from the mediation.

Section 2.(a)

All who exercise the rights described in Section 1., and Section 1.(a) of this Act, shall take reasonable care to prevent environmental destruction, and are responsible to mitigate any possible foreseen negative impacts on the natural environments, and all persons who neglect such practices shall be subject to the authority designated under Section 2.(b) herein, but such remedies are to be used to help individuals come into compliance with this section and not to unreasonably burden individuals who exercise the rights described in Section 1.

Section 2.(b)

The County of Lake Environmental Health Department shall administer over individual circumstances that may arise related to Section 2. and Section 2.(a) herein, but all such administrative authority and compliance inquiries shall be restricted to circumstances where a verifiable neighbor (or resident of the county) complaint in writing and signed by the complainant has been officially registered with the county.

Section 3., Special Circumstances:

Any law, to the extent that it would specifically deny or disparage the Human Rights as described in Section 1. of this Act, (and not withstanding an individual in violation of using illegal gardening chemicals, including but not limited to, certain pesticides, herbicides, fungicides and fertilizers), is to be set aside unless it can be determined that the individual circumstance is occurring within the context of "commerce" related activities as defined herein, or if an individual's violation(s) of Section 2.(a) of this Act are to the extent of violating a criminal statute.

Section 3.(a)

This Act shall not apply in circumstances where (a) private rental or lease agreement(s) (contract) exist(s) pertaining to the occupancy and or use of any private land unless such is otherwise specifically enumerated within said agreement(s) (contract), or unless the agreement(s) (contract) does not specify any conditions or agreement pertaining to outside (or greenhouse) home gardening.

Section 4., Definitions:

(a) For the express purposes of this Act, the word "commerce" shall be taken to mean:
The buying and selling of goods or services in any form, and in direct reference to the exchange of United States currency (or other such legally recognized tender) for such goods or services.

(b) For the express purposes of this Act, the words phrased as "compliance inquiries" shall be taken to mean:

A written and delivered inquiry, and an in person inquiry as to responding to (a) specific complaint(s), and to which access to inspect private property shall only be in circumstances where the respondent has voluntarily agreed to and granted such access, or where on an individual basis, a court order has provided for such access.

(c) For the express purposes of Section 1. of this Act, the words phrased as "to be used for their own needs" shall be taken to mean:
For use as food, medicine, fiber, fuel, building materials, environmental damage mitigation or other environmental concerns, privacy, aesthetics or ambiance, spiritual/religious requirement, (or other) basic necessities of life.

(d) For the express purposes of Section 1. of this Act, the word "natural" and the words phrased as "naturally occurring" shall be taken to mean:
Plant species and varieties of such that have evolved in nature through the traditional pollination and cross pollination processes, be that by wind/weather, or animal (including human) assistance.

(e) For the express purposes of Section 1.(a) and Section 3.(a) of this Act, the word "greenhouse" shall be taken to mean:
Any structure where the sun's light can penetrate at least 80% of the roof (ceiling or top) surface and that is intended for and used for growing plants in.

Section 5., Severability:

If any provision of this Act or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of the Act which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Act are severable. The People of the County of Lake hereby declare that we would have adopted this Act irrespective of the invalidity of any particular portion thereof.

I must admit that at first I thought the idea was nuts. Now I am on board but only if it extends to animals as well. It seems as if large corporations actually ARE coming after our food , harrassing raw milk producers (and consumers), attempting to patent the dna in seeds where they have done nothing but catalogue the DNA, no tinkering, not inventing. Seems they are attempting to do this with animal genetics as well.


The founders could not possibly have imagined that we would need to include our right to the DNA commons. there may come a time whey you will not be allowed to plant seeds unless you are under contract - no matter how trivial that contract may seem. And you may not be allowed to save your seeds - something I have been doing for the past 10 years - those tomatoes are bred for my region, adapted for my back yard, flavor, quick growth, and resistance to my particular brand of pests. It seems at first blush (I have yet to do any research in order to verify the documentaries), that a company could claim my seeds as their own simply by identifying a random marker, even though that company has never done anything with my seeds - ever.

if you have the chance watch the documentary "patent on a pig", it is free and online somewhere. I think it will broaden your understanding. Furthermore, more and more people are converting their front yards to gardens - and in many places, including where I live, that garden violates statutes - in other words, if I do not plant grass, I am in violation. We will see this year how hard line the community is as I intend to tear out all of my front yard in favor of fruit trees and fruit bearing vines.
 

heckler73

Well-Known Member
if you have the chance watch the documentary "patent on a pig", it is free and online somewhere. I think it will broaden your understanding.
Is this the documentary?

[video=youtube;pNvWia3dYCE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNvWia3dYCE[/video]
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
Is this the documentary?

[video=youtube;pNvWia3dYCE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNvWia3dYCE[/video]

That is the one, it is the most descriptive - I've not verified it's content yet so it could be filled with leftist hysteria. I don't know yet.


One might also watch "farmageddon"
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
I must admit that at first I thought the idea was nuts. Now I am on board but only if it extends to animals as well. It seems as if large corporations actually ARE coming after our food , harrassing raw milk producers (and consumers), attempting to patent the dna in seeds where they have done nothing but catalogue the DNA, no tinkering, not inventing. Seems they are attempting to do this with animal genetics as well.


The founders could not possibly have imagined that we would need to include our right to the DNA commons. there may come a time whey you will not be allowed to plant seeds unless you are under contract - no matter how trivial that contract may seem. And you may not be allowed to save your seeds - something I have been doing for the past 10 years - those tomatoes are bred for my region, adapted for my back yard, flavor, quick growth, and resistance to my particular brand of pests. It seems at first blush (I have yet to do any research in order to verify the documentaries), that a company could claim my seeds as their own simply by identifying a random marker, even though that company has never done anything with my seeds - ever.

if you have the chance watch the documentary "patent on a pig", it is free and online somewhere. I think it will broaden your understanding. Furthermore, more and more people are converting their front yards to gardens - and in many places, including where I live, that garden violates statutes - in other words, if I do not plant grass, I am in violation. We will see this year how hard line the community is as I intend to tear out all of my front yard in favor of fruit trees and fruit bearing vines.
leftist hysteria.

Naturally occuring life forms are not patentable. Genetically engineered life forms are patentable. Yay for enlightenment.

It is the government that is harassing raw milk producers and consumers, not corporations, and with the cheering applause from you lefties.
 

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
leftist hysteria.

Naturally occuring life forms are not patentable. Genetically engineered life forms are patentable. Yay for enlightenment.

It is the government that is harassing raw milk producers and consumers, not corporations, and with the cheering applause from you lefties.
be it all what is either way, imo its way past time at least to reaffirm our natural human rights in this area of law.
it would solve many problems and through this fundamental clarification it would also help us to deal with other legal problems/conflicts that spring up from technological advancements like genetic engineering and nano tech etc...
 

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
I must admit that at first I thought the idea was nuts. Now I am on board but only if it extends to animals as well. It seems as if large corporations actually ARE coming after our food , harrassing raw milk producers (and consumers), attempting to patent the dna in seeds where they have done nothing but catalogue the DNA, no tinkering, not inventing. Seems they are attempting to do this with animal genetics as well.


The founders could not possibly have imagined that we would need to include our right to the DNA commons. there may come a time whey you will not be allowed to plant seeds unless you are under contract - no matter how trivial that contract may seem. And you may not be allowed to save your seeds - something I have been doing for the past 10 years - those tomatoes are bred for my region, adapted for my back yard, flavor, quick growth, and resistance to my particular brand of pests. It seems at first blush (I have yet to do any research in order to verify the documentaries), that a company could claim my seeds as their own simply by identifying a random marker, even though that company has never done anything with my seeds - ever.

if you have the chance watch the documentary "patent on a pig", it is free and online somewhere. I think it will broaden your understanding. Furthermore, more and more people are converting their front yards to gardens - and in many places, including where I live, that garden violates statutes - in other words, if I do not plant grass, I am in violation. We will see this year how hard line the community is as I intend to tear out all of my front yard in favor of fruit trees and fruit bearing vines.
protection of the genetic commons under the wing of human rights...
simple acknowledgement of the human right to have seed and grow plants would probably have been helpful to these folks some time back when they got wangdoozeled into being a monsanto test plot of sorts, only these 'provisional law' test seeds temporarily terminated the basic human rights that the proposed measure in the op seeks to protect.

http://www.iraqcoalition.org/regulations/20040426_CPAORD_81_Patents_Law.pdf

also it seeks to protect anyone's right and choice to live beyond the yellow brick road...

"So goodbye yellow brick road where the dogs of society howl
You can't plant me in your penthouse
I'm going back to my plow
Back to the howling old owl in the woods
Hunting the horny back toad
Oh, I've finally decided my future lies
Beyond the yellow brick road"
 

canndo

Well-Known Member
leftist hysteria.

Naturally occuring life forms are not patentable. Genetically engineered life forms are patentable. Yay for enlightenment.

It is the government that is harassing raw milk producers and consumers, not corporations, and with the cheering applause from you lefties.

Of course you didn't see the film - btw, this is the abbreviated one. Monsanto indeed is attempting to patent naturly occurring genes because they have done the sequencing.

Yes, the government is harassing milk farmers - why do you suppose? Just angry with the little farmers?
 

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
someone sent me this snippet this morning that i haven't yet researched, but it seemed worth posting here in its relation to the measure this thread is about etc...


"Community Rights educator Paul Cienfuegos explains how "We The People" are exercising the authority to govern ourselves and dismantle corporate rule. When small farmers in rural Pennsylvania wanted to say "no" to a corporate factory farm coming into their community, they learned they couldn't, because it would violate the corporation's "rights" and state pre-emption laws. So they did something technically illegal - their town passed an innovative ordinance banning corporate factory farming. It worked! The corporation left town. Pittsburgh upshifted the approach: Rather than define what we don't want, define what we DO want. Their "Right to Water" stopped natural gas fracking in the city. Ordinances like this have been passed in over 150 communities in 9 states."
 

pSi007

Active Member
Shasta and Butte county recently and successfully referendum the County counsel.. It is good times, brothers and sisters! I hope Fuck-head The Pig loses his job, house, car, wife and children forced to slavery and prostitution...

Good, Fuck the Police..
 

Pinworm

Well-Known Member
Good, Fuck the Police..
[video=youtube;XLX6xNbhios]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLX6xNbhios[/video]

"Capitalism creates such a division between the rich and the poor, that this surplus population is created.
And, "government" solution has been their containment for increasing petty offenses...."

Let's take all these piggies and see them fucking crucified.
 

DNAprotection

Well-Known Member
Shasta and Butte county recently and successfully referendum the County counsel.. It is good times, brothers and sisters! I hope Fuck-head The Pig loses his job, house, car, wife and children forced to slavery and prostitution...

Good, Fuck the Police..
"Capitalism creates such a division between the rich and the poor, that this surplus population is created.
And, "government" solution has been their containment for increasing petty offenses...."

Let's take all these piggies and see them fucking crucified.

uh...er...ummm, your not talkin bout my relatives right? ;)
seriously folks i dont necessarily see it in that way, i am as outraged as anyone about all these crimes against nature including the crimes against humanity as a result of unconstitutional laws that ignore our basic human rights, but i also know that it is all do to our own lack of vigilance to maintain such rights properly so as to prevent and preempt such atrocities that we now suffer...we need not 'crucify' anyone, we need only declare as the People what our certain rights are...plain and simple.
the ultimate power and say rests with the people and there's plain and simple language in the Declaration of Independence which describes exactly why government exists and how the ultimate authority always rests with the People:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,–That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it,"...


The State and Federal Constitution's also provide the language to assure that the People always have reach to declare certain rights that are help by the People:



9th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America,

"The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.",



California State Constitution, Article 1 Declaration of Rights, Section 21.: ...
"This declaration of rights may not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people."



then at last the California Initiative process provides the appropriate avenue for remedy in declaring what such certain rights are.



[video=youtube;XJcKBK9Gt8k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJcKBK9Gt8k&list=UUopylmyCdpjNQGbcYkrd6oQ& feature=player_embedded[/video]
 
Top