BigBudBalls
Well-Known Member
Thats what I was figuring on. I don't *have* a current system, just thinking. The float valve/bottom watering would be easiest to do. A drip system isn't hard either. (just adds in electronics)
I'm just hunting for the simplest hands off system (I know there will be some maint)
I'm just hunting for the simplest hands off system (I know there will be some maint)
You don't want to maintain that water level. You'll end up getting root rot. It's important for the plants to drink up the water that they have in that resevoir at the bottom of the bucket before you add new water. If you always keep that water there in the bottom those roots won't be able to get enough air to live, and wamo, root rot.
I don't see the problem with bottom feeding per say, assuming that the medium you use has enough of a wick type action. It's important for all of the roots to get some water, and not just the ones on the bottom. That being said I don't really see the advantage of bottom feeding to top feeding.
If you were planning on using your home automation style float valve on hempy buckets, I think you would be better off just doing it the way you have it right now. Top feeding with drippers twice a week. I think that if you switched your set up from where the resevior was on the float valve, to where all of the buckets were on the float valve you'll end up over watering, getting diseases, stressing the plant, and inviting root rot.
I hope this helps, but I would like to hear what Az has to say on the topic, as he certainly is more of the authority on the matter than I.