Too many Americans are incarcerated for too long

Too many Americans are incarcerated for too long




http://www.latimes.com/opinion/edit...ocaine-20140205,0,4755028.story#ixzz2strHBJId


Despite persistent polarization in Washington, a bipartisan consensus is emerging around the proposition that too many Americans are incarcerated for too long. Democrats tend to emphasize the injustice of excessive sentences that disproportionately affect racial minorities. Republicans are more likely to stress the cost of over-incarceration. But the common ground is real and significant.


Last week, by a vote of 13 to 5, the Senate Judiciary Committee approved the Smarter Sentencing Act, sponsored by Sens. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah). The bill would reduce mandatory minimum sentences for many nonviolent drug offenses and make retroactive a 2010 law reducing sentences for the possession of crack cocaine, a change that could benefit as many as 8,800 prisoners. The huge disparity between sentences for crack and powder cocaine had the effect of punishing black defendants more harshly than white ones. The legislation also instructs the U.S. Sentencing Commission to formulate its sentencing guidelines to "minimize the likelihood that the federal prison population will exceed the capacity of the federal prisons."


Apparently as the price of Republican support for the larger bill, the committee also approved amendments that undermine the objective of reducing incarceration rates, including new mandatory minimum sentences for domestic violence and sex offenses. Mandatory minimums, regardless of the offense, are a bad idea. They undermine the Sentencing Commission's mandate and unnecessarily hamstring judicial discretion. But they are supported not only by members of Congress but by career federal prosecutors. The National Assn. of Assistant U.S. Attorneys has criticized Atty. Gen. Eric H. Holder Jr. for supporting legislation to modify mandatory minimums in drug cases.


Fortunately, Holder has made it clear that he recognizes that too many defendants are being sentenced to too much time in prison. He has undertaken a "Smart on Crime" initiative that, among other things, directs U.S. attorneys to refrain from charging low-level, nonviolent drug offenders with crimes that would lead to draconian mandatory minimum sentences. Holder's deputy, James M. Cole, recently asked defense lawyers to identify long-serving prisoners who would be eligible for presidential clemency.


The United States is the world leader in incarceration. That is a dubious form of American exceptionalism that both parties in Washington — and in the 50 states — are finally beginning to rectify.

We incarcerate for profit. Ultimately, I think this helps push young men into the military that see that as their only option. You need Army volunteers? Increase the pressure on the youth, then offer them a solution = global police force for hire.

I see both sides of this issue. From first hand experience I can say prison does nothing to correct anyone's
behavior. You will occasionally meet someone that get's away from hard drugs or finds religion but, if those same
people were sentenced to rehab/probation/halfway house they would most likely ended up the same.The other 90%
of the time it just turns people into better criminals.

There are also certain people and crimes that do not get enough jail time in my opinion. If I were a judge I would send a lot
less people to jail but, the people I do give jail time too, would be gone for a long azz time.