trayvan martin

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
zimm called 911 7 times since august to report a "suspicious "person...all 7 were black...sense a pattern????
can you cite this? if this is true, then we can say with some degree of confidence that zimmerman not only profiled martin, but racially profiled him.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
He had an idea the kid was Black because he mentioned on the call when asked that he looks black, right from the start. If he didn't think he was Black he would not have
said so. So that means he already had an idea that Trayvon was Black. How does one look Black at night, with a hoodie on? Unless you thought the person you're looking at
is...common sense to me.
Do
U
Know
Every

Average
Name
That
He
Often
Never
Yo yo

?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
fact: on the 911 call, zimmerman describes martin as looking like he is in his "late teens".

fact: under oath today, zimmerman said that he thought martin was "a little bit younger" than him.

did zimmerman start off this whole thing by lying under oath? i think so.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
he profiled him as a thief on drugs, basically.
A possible thief on possible drugs. But his "**** always get away" mumble rather supports that version.
Trouble is, all this profiling talk, of either Trayvon (thief in hoodie on drugs) and Zimmerman (angry wannabe cop with something to prove) is not about facts or established boundaries of the event. It's about statistical risk factors alloyed with the irreducible prejudice of the profiler. Statistics in the Clemensian sense ... "there are lies, damned lies, and statistics".
I realize that in this, RIU's Star Chamber of public opinion, the profiling stuff is pretty much all we have to go on. But I maintain that conclusions suggested by such extrapolations from (itself controversial) past performance is awfully thin material on which to base a personal verdict. Since I don't have a big fabric balloon with a wicker gondola, I have no real use for it. cn
 

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
fact: on the 911 call, zimmerman describes martin as looking like he is in his "late teens".

fact: under oath today, zimmerman said that he thought martin was "a little bit younger" than him.

did zimmerman start off this whole thing by lying under oath? i think so.
What he remeber's and thinks now after all this "Hate" and "Racist Threat's"against his life and familie's life is "Crazy",,,WTF,,,This is a "OJ",,,Black Racist problem all over again!,,,Man I tell ya,,,Wake up! This is BS.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What he remeber's and thinks now after all this "Hate" and "Racist Threat's"against his life and familie's life is "Crazy",,,WTF,,,This is a "OJ",,,Black Racist problem all over again!,,,Man I tell ya,,,Wake up! This is BS.
peanut buter,,,and "jelly"!,,,on toast,,,And a box of aminal crackers! This is Sparta!,,,
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
fact: on the 911 call, zimmerman describes martin as looking like he is in his "late teens".

fact: under oath today, zimmerman said that he thought martin was "a little bit younger" than him.

did zimmerman start off this whole thing by lying under oath? i think so.
You get funnier by the day, UB! Thanks for that.
 

PeachOibleBoiblePeach#1

Well-Known Member
It's a Tall tale for a "Pale skin" killing a "Black Skin",,,and Then "executing him",,,In the name of "Racist",,,Where these "Mob's of Black's" are ready to kill the "White's" and disrupt The Justice system,,,Don't bow down to this BS,,,He's a Scapegoat,,,For "Hatred".
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
so you think those two statements are perfectly consistent? no wonder you buy the rest of zimmerman's tall tale.
What I think is that you seize on a whole host of irrelevant issues, then relentlessly pound them into the ground as if they mean anything. You can't win a debate by simply repeating irrelevancies. When you are not spouting irrelevant non-sense, you switch over to claims of conspiracies that are ridiculous on their face. You totally ignore the analysis of Dershowitz. Wanting Zimmer to be guilty of a crime does not make him guilty of a crime.

The prosecutor might have some evidence up her skirt that I am not aware of. What I have seen so far only supports Zimmerman's account of what happened.

"He laid in the morgue for three days with a 'John Doe' tag on his toe"
"It all happened in the grass"
"...late teens... a little younger..."
"twice Trayvon's size..."
 

RyanTheRhino

Well-Known Member
You know this whole argument was created to entice argument. I am glad that the media still has a hold of your nuts, because they left mine along time ago.


1) George followed Trevon.
2) Trevon notices someone looking.
3) Something happens<<<<<<<<<<<<
4) George gets out of his car
5) Wow George is getting fucked up in a fight/ or George is fine with no fist/head contact, in distress stand your ground law stands.




Just because you are being watched does not mean you can turn around and confront this person violently. this case will turn down to who started the confrontation. what happened that George got out of the car. Did trey throw something or did George get out on his own will.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
What I think is that you seize on a whole host of irrelevant issues, then relentlessly pound them into the ground as if they mean anything. You can't win a debate by simply repeating irrelevancies. When you are not spouting irrelevant non-sense, you switch over to claims of conspiracies that are ridiculous on their face. You totally ignore the analysis of Dershowitz. Wanting Zimmer to be guilty of a crime does not make him guilty of a crime.

The prosecutor might have some evidence up her skirt that I am not aware of. What I have seen so far only supports Zimmerman's account of what happened.

"He laid in the morgue for three days with a 'John Doe' tag on his toe"
"It all happened in the grass"
"...late teens... a little younger..."
"twice Trayvon's size..."
Ill give you this piece of advice for free, UB is a troll, not just an ordinary troll, but a very consistent and persistent troll. Don't try argue, the more butthurt you get and the more irrelevant his posts get combined with you freaking out is a troll wet-dream. Ifyou say the sky is blue, he'll say it's green and enjoy you freaking trying to tell him to look out the window ;)
 

Moses Mobetta

Well-Known Member
Ill give you this piece of advice for free, UB is a troll, not just an ordinary troll, but a very consistent and persistent troll. Don't try argue, the more butthurt you get and the more irrelevant his posts get combined with you freaking out is a troll wet-dream. Ifyou say the sky is blue, he'll say it's green and enjoy you freaking trying to tell him to look out the window ;)
Spoken wisely
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
Ill give you this piece of advice for free, UB is a troll, not just an ordinary troll, but a very consistent and persistent troll. Don't try argue, the more butthurt you get and the more irrelevant his posts get combined with you freaking out is a troll wet-dream. Ifyou say the sky is blue, he'll say it's green and enjoy you freaking trying to tell him to look out the window ;)
You're right. I should know better, but sometimes the pain gets so good that I just have to shoot a big load of jiz in his direction.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
What I think is that you seize on a whole host of irrelevant issues, then relentlessly pound them into the ground as if they mean anything.
so, whether or not zimmerman is a liar is irrelevant?

i don't think you know what irrelevant means.

the credibility of zimmerman is very relevant to this case. they let him walk that night based on his word.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
this case will turn down to who started the confrontation.
not really.

even if zimmerman started it, if he was losing the fight he could fire in self defense given the right set of accompanying conditions.

we got a small peak today into how the legal teams may proceed.
 
Top