Uber considering flying cars, should government "allow" this to happen?

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
schuylaar said:
He's boring though..it's always the same.
Click to expand...
The truth can be like that.

It is anchored to logic and consistency, wherein something false is unbounded and can be inconsistent, illogical and nonsensical, which might be why you lean in that direction.
 
doublejj

doublejj

Well-Known Member
flying cars will be electric & self driving, with avoidance software & will be 100 times safer than driving on the road..can anyone say Tesla?8)
 
Grandpapy

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Have you considered that if flying cars (which are technologically possible now) became too prevalent, that government wouldn't want people to have them simply because it is a form of freedom that control freaks would melt down over?
Click to expand...
Have you considered commerce uses this as a distraction to lead tainted water?

IMO we should learn to keep trains from bumping into each other first.
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Grandpapy said:
Have you considered commerce uses this as a distraction to lead tainted water?

IMO we should learn to keep trains from bumping into each other first.
Click to expand...
Sometimes it happens the way you described.

Commerce by itself as a voluntary exchange between two willing parties is neutral. When it spills over and causes negative effects beyond the willing participants is when things like lead tainted water occur.

In my opinion we should all smoke some Trainwreck.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top