vermont proposes latin state motto

Rob Roy said:

How would you invade another persons property and make them use their body to serve you, when they clearly prefer not to ?

Click to expand...

i can't make them do that because they can just open a private club, shit for brains. if they really prefer to not serve me based on my skin color, they can ya fucking dolt.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

what would be the most peaceful, least aggressive way to kick someone out of your store based on their skin color?

UncleBuck said:

i can't make them do that because they can just open a private club, shit for brains. if they really prefer to not serve me based on my skin color, they can ya fucking dolt.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

what would be the most peaceful, least aggressive way to kick someone out of your store based on their skin color?

Click to expand...

What happened to the property that the person you want to force to associate with others ? Did the nature of that property change, did it somehow become, "quasi property" and some other entity acquired ownership and control of it?


Also, you are afraid to answer MY questions. Until you do, I'm putting you in the closet for awhile, please clean up the mess when you're through. Peace.

Rob Roy said:

What happened to the property that the person you want to force to associate with others ? Did the nature of that property change, did it somehow become, "quasi property" and some other entity acquired ownership and control of it?

Click to expand...

no, he still owns it every bit as much as he did before.

Rob Roy said:

you are afraid to answer MY questions

Click to expand...

yet i keep answering them and you keep running away from mine.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

what would be the most peaceful, least aggressive way to kick someone out of your store based on their skin color?

UncleBuck said:

no, he still owns it every bit as much as he did before.



yet i keep answering them and you keep running away from mine.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

what would be the most peaceful, least aggressive way to kick someone out of your store based on their skin color?

Click to expand...

You are wrong mathematically. If the persons rights of ownership were to be quantified, the intrusion and usurpation of his right of control of said property,by another entity (coercive government) has REDUCED his available options, hence has reduced his ownership interest.

I know you may want to argue that point, but logic has my back.

Steven Hawking called and said you are a black hole.




When you have to miscast my position, you are really admitting that you can't argue your points or refute mine.

What does voluntary mean? What does consent mean? How's the air in that closet?

Rob Roy said:

If the persons rights of ownership were to be quantified, the intrusion and usurpation of his right of control of said property,by another entity (coercive government) has REDUCED his available options, hence has reduced his ownership interest.

Click to expand...

so a person owns his store 'less' if he cannot kick people out based on their skin color?

you still didn't answer my question, even though i was so nice to answer yours.

I am kicking your non-intellectual ass. That is evident by your lack of response to some specific questions.

what would be the most peaceful, least aggressive way to kick someone out of your store based on their skin color?