Video shows Arizona officer ramming into robbery suspect

NoDrama said:

I like how you have seen that your original argument is indefensible in the face of facts and now have to have a completely new argument in order to be even a little bit right. Its not quite synonymous with admitting defeat of the original argument, but semantics aside its exactly the same thing. Your original argument was that there are more cars than firearms, but that has been proven incorrect so now your argument is that cars are driven more often than guns are carried. If you would have made that statement from the get go you would not have heard a word otherwise from me.

Driving a car isn't a right. You can't pass legislation requiring a special training class in order to exercise a right.

Click to expand...