you selfish greedy AHOLE..you are one of them limosine liberals arnt you?..tell everyone how to spend their money..all the time protecting your piles of vast money..probably earned from union contracts and government tax payers pockets..wow..i cant believe you call me greedy and selfish..i dont have race cars or rental property...lol..typical liberal hypocrite..do as i say..not as i do...you should sell all of your assets and give the money to the government..practice what you preach..
Orwell was a Trotskyist, which is a form of Leninism, the dominant mode of Marxist Communist thought. Orwell's books were meant to draw parallels to the Soviet Union, not socialism in general.^^^^
The answer, of course, was stated by George Orwell in Animal Farm while describing a socialist system .... "All pigs are equal, except some pigs are more equal than others." Hell ... some socialist pigs even have pensions, go on luxury vacations, own self indulgent hot rods and own rental property.
Vi
~lol~ Orwell may have been what you say, however, his books were excellent condemnations of fascism. Projected out, they illustrated many parallels with the advance of socialistic fascism here in the U.S. "A boot in the face FOREVER!"
WTF, are you even old enough to be allowed on this site? You are so juvenile in your postings. When your balls drop, get back to meyou selfish greedy AHOLE..you are one of them limosine liberals arnt you?..tell everyone how to spend their money..all the time protecting your piles of vast money..probably earned from union contracts and government tax payers pockets..wow..i cant believe you call me greedy and selfish..i dont have race cars or rental property...lol..typical liberal hypocrite..do as i say..not as i do...you should sell all of your assets and give the money to the government..practice what you preach..
Not Jealous Med, just confused how you fail to bring your personal life in line with your beliefs. I think the common term for that is hypocrite.
I'm not a wealthy man in monied things, but in family, I'm very wealthy. I'll just say this, before the housing bubble burst, I was a lot wealthier.
Let's take this hypothetical: You get a catastrophic disease, cancer of the bone let's say, they have to amputate your arms to save your miserable life. Then you are unable to work. To live you have to use your savings and retirement fund and have at least one friend, (Maybe the impossible) to feed your ass. Now you run out of money, oops, time to exterminate your worthless ass. That's what you propose for everyone else, how would you like it??i cant wait till all these bogus retirement accounts the unions have formed go bankrupt[i want to hear a bunch of biatch;s bawl baby]...the unions have lost their ass's in the stock market..it will be a amusing day when all the retirement checks stop showing up in the mail...and no more med bennies because the company that funded and supported the retirement program went out of bussines ..over 80 million baby boomers are set to retire..the federal government owes them 100 trillion dollars.where they going to get it?wow..socialists are a bunch of silly fuckers..that do not understand basic math...economics ..NOTHING. is free...
So you'd be fine with the above then, being cast on the trash heap as soon as you ran out of money. Yeah right. You'd be the guy crying loudest of all, Waaahhhhh, where's my subsidy. By your posts, I can tell you are a spoiled brat. I can also tell you don't want to be a Member of society.
Wow, Med can actually read a dictionary, or an encyclopedia. Who'd have thought that he'd be able to use reference materials.
Oh gawd Med, don't try explaining what a society is to these people. They will call you a terrorist and say you are pushing for wealth distribution.
Calling it socialistic fascism is unfair, as there's more capitalism in the current system than socialism and you're leaving it out in the name. Fascism is about peoples inequalities and those inequalities being beneficial to even the exploited classes; it wanted some market protectionism, but was pretty much todays market economy with a more authoritarian State apparatus because it was more threatened at the time, and depending on which version of the ideology we're talking about a differing interest in irredentism.~lol~ Orwell may have been what you say, however, his books were excellent condemnations of fascism. Projected out, they illustrated many parallels with the advance of socialistic fascism here in the U.S. "A boot in the face FOREVER!"
By the way, I've been enjoying your posts, Ray. Very well thought out ... thanks.
Vi
