When Rome was just starting out a the SPRQ, as a few fraternities, Sicily was actually part of the Carthiginian empire, and Carthage was established by Tyre, Queen Dido, all that. So Sicily was actually an African Territory before Rome got big.50% Sicilian, 25% Italian, the rest German and Brit with a dash of French. The genome of Sicily is interesting: Italian, Greek, Black, Norman, Hebrew, and whatever the Phoenicians were. Basically all the sailors of Med. history
That came from moms German contribution. My dad contributed the addictive behavior and the English/Irish preponderance towards drinking. In short, I'm a creative mess.Awww so you dont know where your artistic side comes from?
So what is the difference? Did they get to pick your eye color, or delete a gene, or was it just artificially done but with the same result?That came from moms German contribution. My dad contributed the addictive behavior and the English/Irish preponderance towards drinking. In short, I'm a creative mess.
I believe it's general opinion that the Carthiginians were derived from the Phoenicians. Lots of historical references to the "sea people" who pretty much raided and romped thru the Mediterranean in early history. They even threatened the Pharaonic rule for awhile, a thousand or more years before the Romans existedAlso, there were the Punic People, which were the people of Queen Dido I think. They were only part of the Carthiginian Empire, but one family (2 main generals) from the Punic background were the center of the entire 2 Punic Wars, which were the Carthage V Roman wars.
I don't disagree,I will get some stuff I wrote a while ago and post it here. About both Phoenicians and Sea People. I am just talking about Sicily Historically not being Italian, which is what was meant by 50% Sicilian, 25% Italian. I was just saying there is a definite difference between Sicilian and Italian, because of History.I believe it's general opinion that the Carthiginians were derived from the Phoenicians. Lots of historical references to the "sea people" who pretty much raided and romped thru the Mediterranean in early history. They even threatened the Pharaonic rule for awhile, a thousand or more years before the Romans existed
Yep.I don't disagree,I will get some stuff I wrote a while ago and post it here. About both Phoenicians and Sea People. I am just talking about Sicily Historically not being Italian, which is what was meant by 50% Sicilian, 25% Italian. I was just saying there is a definite difference between Sicilian and Italian, because of History.
I come from the centre of a star, so do you, why do you think ethnicity has any real meaning? is it not simply a distraction from what you really are, your higher self, which has no ethnicity or colour?
I'm not saying it necessarily changes anything, but it is important to people to know where they come from. A people with no past has no future.I come from the centre of a star, so do you, why do you think ethnicity has any real meaning? is it not simply a distraction from what you really are, your higher self, which has no ethnicity or colour?
That too. I don't see why there are still like White Explorer shows. Anthony Bordain going everywhere and saying "Wheres the food and the alcohol?" is more culturally educational than someone acting like the people are not people.The food![]()
It could either be Irish or Iberian. Keltic/Celtic groups started in Iberia (Spain/France/Protugal) and being so close to Africa, probably Africa as well. British People are Anglo-Saxon, kind of like a Blonde German, same Heritage. But Ireland, Keltic Heritage, is a completely different thing.I am of Keltic Ancestry, where do they fit in?? pre roman without national bounders, like as zedd said no difference all the same...apart from the food...
nice one singlemalt
FifyI'm not saying it necessarily changes anything, but it is important to people to know where they come from. A people with no pasta alla Norma has no future.