Damn it, I've got to reform the question in order to arrive at the right answer.
A forcible monopoly should not exist, therefore those kinds of things should not be profitable, nor should a forcible monopoly be the basis of systems like government which is really just a kind of forcible monopoly.
Consumers when they are "allowed" to have more choices are an important part of keeping markets honest.
So the answer is contained within a real free market, where all people are equal, having the ability to chose a service provider from a host of potentials or having the ability to become a free market service provider.. then the original post question becomes less relevant.
The present "allowed" alternative...Expecting a forcible monopoly to oversee, who can have a monopoly or to determine what is fair and what is not, is a form of circular illogic.