who puts the locks on threads

420IAMthatIAM said:
I'm vented:oops:
Click to expand...

...the problem is with 'feeling'. There is a level of awareness that is not for typical discussion. It's a feeling, and it is described in the same way in psychological textbooks. It gets to be 'beyond' scrutiny because no one can explain it. I realize this is a point of contention for those with harder scientific minds, but 'it' does seem to be a reality. The modern mind has difficulty admitting that it is not the 'point' of the stack, or spiral, or whatever.
 
Heisenberg said:
Which parameters are you speaking of?
Click to expand...


...I realize that harsh scrutiny in the field is necessary, but I wonder how many of us are partaking in a particular (hard copy) scientific endeavor? We need a Speak Easy thread and fck the rules :razz:

...aaaaand, I just realized that the metaphysics thread already 'exists' :)
 
420IAMthatIAM said:
maybe if youkiss-assthey will give you your wish
Click to expand...
No need to kiss ass. Most forums dislike public complaints about mods. Most are volunteers merely trying to keep some semblance of order. Every site has their own level of how much crap slinging will go one but if you have a problem with a moderation decision, the appropriate response is PM the administrators who oversee the mods and they will review your complaint and deal with a bad decision or if like this instance, try to explain what you seem to not understand.

Not a single person has agreed with anything you said here. There is no purpose for this thread except to waste space and rant at people that are trying to help give back to the site, and generally act fairly and do a pretty decent job of remaining non-partial. You are imagining that someone was slighted. This thread is based on you misconception and you have been given all of the explanation you need.
 
mindphuk said:
No need to kiss ass. Most forums dislike public complaints about mods. Most are volunteers merely trying to keep some semblance of order. Every site has their own level of how much crap slinging will go one but if you have a problem with a moderation decision, the appropriate response is PM the administrators who oversee the mods and they will review your complaint and deal with a bad decision or if like this instance, try to explain what you seem to not understand.

Not a single person has agreed with anything you said here. There is no purpose for this thread except to waste space and rant at people that are trying to help give back to the site, and generally act fairly and do a pretty decent job of remaining non-partial. You are imagining that someone was slighted. This thread is based on you misconception and you have been given all of the explanation you need.
Click to expand...
sorry buddy but I already vented:bigjoint:
 
Heisenberg said:
I am the one who closed his threads, and each time I pointed out that discussion of the topic is welcome and should be done in existing threads. In a world where any of you can buy a server and then install and host your own forums, your speech has hardly been limited. Also curious that you would arbitrarily decide that the thread was closed due to the word "love". If I closed every thread that talked about love i'd never get anything else done.

Incidentally, the reason the threads were closed, and not deleted, is because some people had responded and I didn't want to delete their words along with the spam.
Click to expand...

Very Reasonable.
 
mindphuk said:
No need to kiss ass. Most forums dislike public complaints about mods. Most are volunteers merely trying to keep some semblance of order. Every site has their own level of how much crap slinging will go one but if you have a problem with a moderation decision, the appropriate response is PM the administrators who oversee the mods and they will review your complaint and deal with a bad decision or if like this instance, try to explain what you seem to not understand.

Not a single person has agreed with anything you said here. There is no purpose for this thread except to waste space and rant at people that are trying to help give back to the site, and generally act fairly and do a pretty decent job of remaining non-partial. You are imagining that someone was slighted. This thread is based on you misconception and you have been given all of the explanation you need.
Click to expand...

A suggestion: before complaining to admin (who are busier than the proverbial one-armed paperhanger) one might PM the mod in question. Next level: another subsection mod (we're listed on our subforum's topics page at the bottom) and perhaps then a global, e.g. chiceh or sunni. Often these folks have the time and the inclination to sort things out. cn
 
cannabineer said:
If we embrace the idea that both are humanities, the distinction evaporates. cn
Click to expand...

...for those who have stumbled upon that kind of thinking, yes. For others the big dipper points to snack time :)

98846_t.Jpeg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Plutonium
Why Are Globalists and Governments so Desperate for 100% Vaccination Rates?
Replies
15
Views
864
blu3bird
blu3bird
Jimdamick
Trump banned from Twitter ?
Replies
9
Views
553
UncleBuck
UncleBuck
squarepush3r
Why did establishment liberals fall in love with a deranged Twitter thread?
Replies
5
Views
475
Unclebaldrick
Unclebaldrick
vostok
The women who invented the Brazilian wax
Replies
11
Views
921
vostok
vostok
G
CTV viewers demand Vancouver close Robson Square illegal drug market
Replies
10
Views
868
OLD MOTHER SATIVA
OLD MOTHER SATIVA
Back
Top