A
phenotype (from Greek
phainein, 'to show' +
typos, 'type') is the composite of an
organism's observable characteristics or
traits, such as its
morphology,
development, biochemical or physiological properties,
phenology,
behavior, and products of behavior (such as a bird's nest). A phenotype results from the expression of an organism's genes as well as the influence of environmental factors and the interactions between the two. When two or more clearly different phenotypes exist in the same population of a species, the species is called
polymorph.
The
genotype of an organism is the inherited instructions it carries within its genetic code. Not all organisms with the same genotype look or act the same way because appearance and behavior are modified by environmental and developmental conditions. Likewise, not all organisms that look alike necessarily have the same genotype.
Basic understanding of this reveals a strange truth: He who creates the best environment will get the best phenotype. Matter of fact, it is not about the BEST environment, it is about creating the environment within which a certain phenotype will be expressed. If you want to see what is on the pack, create the same conditions.
StOw, this is the point Genuity was trying to make too. It takes a lot more than air, food and water and light being looked after to get that right. You DO have a hand in steering the course of where your plants are going to end up. If lighting can make such a severe change as producing a whole different sex on the same plant, I am sure more subtle environmental factors can influence the plant in more subtle ways. But it all adds up.
Stopping at the basics seems really lazy to me.
So in my opinion absolutely every person's point is totally valid on this topic and merely flip sides of a coin, not opposing paradigms.
I agree, a good grower with a bag seed will do better than a shit grower with a great seed. But what everybody leaves out is the good grower with the good seed is going to be the one to walk with the king.