Sandbagger
New Member
Where did you read this nonsense ??
why don't people have fur?
- Thread starter fdd2blk
- Start date
Sandbagger
New Member
Re eskimos: If man had evolved in Alaska we would all be more hairy.
boneheadbob
Well-Known Member
II bet the tempeture in the Garden of Eden was perfect all the time. Adam & Eve ate the Apple and it got cold for the first time. Adam asked God for some fur like all the other animals have and God said, too late, so they covered up with fig leafs and thats why humans dont have hair
xKuroiTaimax
Well-Known Member
In all these years humans have purportedly been around- wouldn't the Eskimos or Inuit people have 'evolved' their own fur to keep them warm and lessen the energy expended in maintaining their core body temperature and chasing after animals to wear their fur?
Sandbagger
New Member
That's a hoot,lol.
Sandbagger
New Member
Man did not walk to Alaska the first day out of the jungle. Also evolution has taken hundreds of thousands of years. It does not just happen overnight. When man did begin to conquer the planet he had animal fur on him and not the genes to grow a pelt of fur.
Sandbagger
New Member
So your woman can keep her head warm under there.
cannabutt
Well-Known Member
survival tactic. keep your fingers warm
xKuroiTaimax
Well-Known Member
14,000 years or so seems adequate if moths can evolve darker coloration to camouflage themselves in a couple hundred years. I'm just saying... The system doesn't really seem very good. I think there is a good reason we have animals. Because man cannot do anything alone. We need them. Though we artificially replicate their features at the cost of the planet; they fed us, clothed us, helped us build society and win wars. We are appointed to be stewards unto animals for that reason, in a mutually beneficial relationship. In the same way I think there almost needs to be imperfection in every creation... Otherwise we would not all be the puzzle pieces with some parts in excess and some sections missing, to congruently fit together and coexist.
Sandbagger
New Member
I agree that we have always needed the animals. I also think we should be good stewards, but appointed ? I think not.
why did man lose his fur only to have to seek it out again in the future?
xKuroiTaimax
Well-Known Member
Ok, fair enough. I've not entered this discussion with the expectation that any one of us knows or will find 'the' answer if there is one. I'm passionate about science, but I also believe in god. There are many holes in both science and man's interpretation of religion, but I always liked the fact the bible says this
But also says this
Getting a little off topic but I think man and beast were created codependent. There is much we both lack in different aras, and we complete eachother.
Okies, I'm done now before I completely derail the thread lol
Carry on
Sandbagger
New Member
Who says he is seeking it. He has no need for it is why it will never happen.
Sandbagger
New Member
I wish I didn't have to shave every day too.
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
I somewhat passionately disagree. I have not seen any evidence that earns the adjective "scientific" for the earth being any younger than a few billion years. If you have any link from unbiased, neither religious nor virulently antireligious sources, I'll prick my ears up. So far the ONLY source I've encountered for "theories" for a young Earth are shamelessly doctrinaire religionist sites, or the endless dreary procession of blogs that don't have an original thought among them but chew the same partisan cud from those same shameless sites over&over. Jmo. cn
cannabineer
Ursus marijanus
Get a more modern floor ... ? cn
Sandbagger
New Member
Now why didn't I think of that,lol !
Similar threads
- Locked
