wow, WTF police?

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Don’t let your pedo fantasies cloud your rebuttal. Try for once not to think about the poor children.
Unfortunately it is books that have clouded your reality. You should concentrate on books that pertain to the real world and offer real world solutions instead of your lame “we are all slaves” rant, and least not your propensity that child adult sex is a normal and consensual act if agreed on by both parties.......
I'm afraid you've gotten carried away with your pedo blathering. I've never advocated that you bang your babysitter and would be disappointed in you, if you did. Well, come to think of it, I'd be disappointed in you either way.

Speaking of nonconsensual interactions, do you willingly fund the arrest and incarceration of people for growing "too many plants"
or not ? If you willingly fund it, you're kind of a pot rapist. If you don't willingly fund it, but they take it anyway, you're kind of a tax slave, Slave.
 

blu3bird

Well-Known Member
Except to be "mentally fit" to be a cop, you have to be ignorant and/or dishonest and willing to believe in the impossible, not to mention having an i.q. that isn't too high is helpful to being hired.

Cops are said to "protect people", as in the general populace. That's dishonest and evasive, designed to obfuscate reality. Not to mention there is ample case law declaring cops have no duty to protect anyone. Their job is revenue collection and law enforcement.

If your pay is derived thru an involuntary process and not consensual voluntary market measures, that pay is taken from people under threat of force. That's exactly how a mugger makes money too. Yet we don't thank muggers for their service do we ?

In any other circumstance if another person, not a cop, told you he was protecting you, but didn't give you any real choice not to pay for his "service" you would immediately recognize that as what it is, extortion. Renaming an action based on who the perpetrator is, is absurd and Orwellian.

As far as the low i.q. , people with higher reasoning ability and that question orders rather than following them usually are not hired as cops. Robert Jordan, a cop applicant in Connecticut wasn't hired because he was "too intelligent".

All the training in the world won't change the facts above.
Thanks, Rob. I appreciate your infinite wisdom and mental fitness
 

scumrot derelict

Well-Known Member
II deleted my last comment because even I got disgusted by it. And, I talk shit all day. Practically for a living.


I fucking hate talking about cops.
 

scumrot derelict

Well-Known Member
What person in their right mind would want to be a cop. Hence plenty of rambo popo.
there is a difference between those types and the other types.

 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
What person in their right mind would want to be a cop. Hence plenty of rambo popo.
Primarily, ex military that still have a thirst for pushing people around with impunity.

The days of the people who genuinely wanted to help make their city/county/state a better place were pushed aside in favor of ex-military that were cheaper to train.

It really is that simple. It was and still is primarily a simple cost cutting measure hiring unqualified combat troops.

They're still compiling numbers on this and it's not a finished study, but so far over the last several years the study has reached, 100% of all fatal shootings have been committed by ex-military police officers.

That's not a coincidence. In fact, word around the campfire is that they're going to shelf the study without ever finishing it.
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
Primarily, ex military that still have a thirst for pushing people around with impunity.

The days of the people who genuinely wanted to help make their city/county/state a better place were pushed aside in favor of ex-military that were cheaper to train.

It really is that simple. It was and still is primarily a simple cost cutting measure hiring unqualified combat troops.

They're still compiling numbers on this and it's not a finished study, but so far over the last several years the study has reached, 100% of all fatal shootings have been committed by ex-military police officers.

That's not a coincidence. In fact, word around the campfire is that they're going to shelf the study without ever finishing it.
Copy and pasted this, one of the first things that popped up. So why is there a huge difference in your numbers? Do you have a source for this study?
In a 2017 investigation, The Marshall Project found that officers in Boston and in Miami with military experience were more likely to have a use-of-force complaint filed against them. In addition, one-third of the 35 fatal police shootings in Albuquerque from January 2010 to April 2014 involved cops who were military veterans.
 

Roger A. Shrubber

Well-Known Member
The best reason not to pay for something which is imposed on you under violent threat for noncompliance is, it's wrong.


All of the "services" which government alleges to provide are paid for thru involuntary means. I'm sure if people really want something it can be accomplished another way. For instance, grocery stores, you pick the one you like, but if you don't pick STORE X, you're not forced to give them money.
if you don't pick America, then feel free to go to country X....i'll help you pack....and give you a good boot in the ass to help you get started
 

Glovelove

Well-Known Member
We should just get rid of all types of law enforcement and go back to the wild west .
Just 1 day of everyone being allowed to drive as fast as they want would change us forever lol.
 

PokerJay83

Well-Known Member
Primarily, ex military that still have a thirst for pushing people around with impunity.

The days of the people who genuinely wanted to help make their city/county/state a better place were pushed aside in favor of ex-military that were cheaper to train.

It really is that simple. It was and still is primarily a simple cost cutting measure hiring unqualified combat troops.

They're still compiling numbers on this and it's not a finished study, but so far over the last several years the study has reached, 100% of all fatal shootings have been committed by ex-military police officers.

That's not a coincidence. In fact, word around the campfire is that they're going to shelf the study without ever finishing it.
That is what we are trained to do is to kill. Combat vets with PTSD should not be cops imo. I don’t even own a gun because I know I have issues. Also look at who the union of the police is. The Fraternal Order of Police. It is a Masonic organization. Some speculate that many of the killings are ritual blood sacrifices. 9C615AB5-957D-4B54-AD32-7CA571112DA1.png
 

PokerJay83

Well-Known Member
Known several LEO over the years. Aside from all the bullshit, a large majority of white cops are racist and most all are authoritarians. Just the way it is. It sucks but it’s true.
This was a straight up murder. The cop was acquitted.

 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
What people have to understand is that to get a murder conviction requires intent. You can't just charge someone with murder because you want to punish them. If there is no intent, there is no murder charge.

People fuck up all the time and kill people. The only reason these cases get mentioned is because they involve a cop.

Regular citizens get the same treatment. If you shot someone you thought was breaking into your house only to find out it was your neighbor that happened to scare the shit out of you, is that murder?

No.

Is it manslaughter?

Definitely.

This case is really no different. It's tragic as hell. But what you can't prove is that this cop knew this woman, had some sort of grievance with her and decided to fake a call to the location to shoot her dead. THAT is what you'd have to prove to get a murder conviction, or something very close to it.

Over charging because of "wanting somebody to pay" is how so very many get off Scot free.
It may be different here but murder 1 requires preplanning and murder 2 requires intent. Shooting someone in the chest cavity should be intent. What you described would be murder 1 here. Also did you have a look at the numbers I mentioned, seems there is a discrepancy. Being always right, I’m sure it was my mistake not yours..........cough lol.
 
Top